The only useful things coming up so far are only useful if the whole
project is using it. Java 8 is still the more interesting target for at
least a couple years I'd imagine. The next LTS version should be more
interesting.
On 2 March 2018 at 11:17, Ralph Goers wrote:
> Hopefully this weekend. I
Hopefully this weekend. I’m not sure if there are any high priority bugs left
on my list that would get in the way. I think I got to them last weekend.
Ralph
> On Mar 2, 2018, at 8:55 AM, Gary Gregory wrote:
>
> How about 2.11.0?
>
> Gary
>
> On Fri, Mar 2, 2018 at 8:55 AM, Gary Gregory wro
How about 2.11.0?
Gary
On Fri, Mar 2, 2018 at 8:55 AM, Gary Gregory wrote:
> But they are removing a bunch of stuff... luckily that we do not depend on.
>
> Gary
>
> On Fri, Mar 2, 2018 at 8:15 AM, Remko Popma wrote:
>
>> I didn't see anything in http://jdk.java.net/10/release-notes that seeme
But they are removing a bunch of stuff... luckily that we do not depend on.
Gary
On Fri, Mar 2, 2018 at 8:15 AM, Remko Popma wrote:
> I didn't see anything in http://jdk.java.net/10/release-notes that seemed
> relevant for Log4j...
>
> On Sat, Mar 3, 2018 at 12:05 AM, Ralph Goers
> wrote:
>
>
I didn't see anything in http://jdk.java.net/10/release-notes that seemed
relevant for Log4j...
On Sat, Mar 3, 2018 at 12:05 AM, Ralph Goers
wrote:
> If somebody sees something in Java 10 or 11 that we should support please
> speak up. So far, I don’t.
>
> Ralph
>
> > On Mar 2, 2018, at 4:03 AM,
If somebody sees something in Java 10 or 11 that we should support please speak
up. So far, I don’t.
Ralph
> On Mar 2, 2018, at 4:03 AM, Rory O'Donnell wrote:
>
> Hi Ralph,
>
> *JDK 10 build 45 is our JDK 10 Release Candidate and now available at
> http://jdk.java.net/10/*
>
> * Schedule,