[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2700?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13085611#comment-13085611
]
Noble Paul commented on SOLR-2700:
--
A couple of comments
* Should we not have a base
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2704?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13085631#comment-13085631
]
Frank Wesemann commented on SOLR-2704:
--
Duplicates SOLR-2542
Context of
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2708?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Chris Male updated SOLR-2708:
-
Attachment: SOLR-2708.patch
First step, preliminary cleanup of the codebase so I can see whats going on.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2700?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13085664#comment-13085664
]
Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-2700:
bq. Should we not have a base class/interface for
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2700?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13085722#comment-13085722
]
Andrzej Bialecki commented on SOLR-2700:
-
+1 for abstract class. E.g. one
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1720?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13085734#comment-13085734
]
Carl Austin commented on LUCENE-1720:
-
Lucene 3.3 changed scoring in TermQuery (and
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3375?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Robert Muir updated LUCENE-3375:
Attachment: LUCENE-3375.patch
Mike's patch, but i ported the tests from the old synfilter to
Build: https://builds.apache.org/job/Lucene-Solr-tests-only-trunk/10188/
No tests ran.
Build Log (for compile errors):
[...truncated 1192 lines...]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3030?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael McCandless updated LUCENE-3030:
---
Attachment: LUCENE-3030.patch
Patch, removing all nocommits!
Block tree terms
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3375?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Robert Muir resolved LUCENE-3375.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 4.0
3.4
Thanks again Simon!
Build: https://builds.apache.org/job/Lucene-Solr-tests-only-trunk-java7/251/
1 tests failed.
REGRESSION: org.apache.solr.update.AutoCommitTest.testSoftAndHardCommitMaxTime
Error Message:
expected:2 but was:3
Stack Trace:
junit.framework.AssertionFailedError: expected:2 but was:3
at
I would like Lucene 3236 to be addressed for version 4 if possible - I
have included a patch and it retains backward compatibility, so it
should not be too much work.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3236
Thanks very much,
Sujit
On Mon, 2011-08-15 at 22:23 -0400, Jason Rutherglen
TermOrdsIterator#lookup throws ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException
-
Key: LUCENE-3377
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3377
Project: Lucene - Java
Issue Type: Bug
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3354?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Martijn van Groningen updated LUCENE-3354:
--
Fix Version/s: 4.0
Extend FieldCache architecture to multiple Values
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3354?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Martijn van Groningen resolved LUCENE-3354.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Committed in revision 1158393 (trunk).
Extend
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3030?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael McCandless updated LUCENE-3030:
---
Attachment: LUCENE-3030.patch
Some small cleanups over the last patch. I'll commit
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3377?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Martijn van Groningen updated LUCENE-3377:
--
Description:
TermOrdsIterator's lookup method can throw an
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3360?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Martijn van Groningen updated LUCENE-3360:
--
Attachment: LUCENE-3360.patch
Attached an updated patch.
* Renamed
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2691?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Hoss Man reopened SOLR-2691:
I'm still seeing this test complain that close() is being called on SolrCore
too many times...
{noformat}
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2675?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Hoss Man updated SOLR-2675:
---
Attachment: SOLR-2675.patch
Yury: your patch looks good to me, here's an updated version that adds a test
so
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2675?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Hoss Man updated SOLR-2675:
---
Affects Version/s: (was: 4.0)
Fix Version/s: 4.0
3.4
Assignee:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2691?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13085923#comment-13085923
]
Mark Miller commented on SOLR-2691:
---
weird...that should really be a test fail...we
Build: https://builds.apache.org/job/Lucene-Solr-tests-only-trunk-java7/252/
1 tests failed.
REGRESSION: org.apache.lucene.search.TestFieldCache.test
Error Message:
Document[1] misses field must be null. Has value [70 4f ea b5 83 e7 96 87 f1 9e
82 be ef a0 b5 59 e8 b2 b0 ee 91 88 f1 a0 84 a6
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2308?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Nikola Tankovic updated LUCENE-2308:
Attachment: LUCENE-2308-merge-1.patch
First merge patch, fixes almost every
Build: https://builds.apache.org/job/Lucene-Solr-tests-only-trunk/10189/
1 tests failed.
REGRESSION: org.apache.lucene.search.TestFieldCache.test
Error Message:
Expected value ΄_擜Ӹ⚵6Ҫq穋ﱡ2缾rᅬҀɈ#ȑ䮨7쀚ْ¾郭ֿ㫉ﰓǣFǯ㌮˷`ǥį䷊팉 ﴭ荽궘ᶣj㘜燎AɄ֤~,ϵ4
for doc 0 and ord 0, but was
Build: https://builds.apache.org/job/Lucene-Solr-tests-only-trunk-java7/253/
1 tests failed.
FAILED: org.apache.lucene.search.TestFieldCache.test
Error Message:
Expected value n|Ĺó̴Ģ楘g߁b囥ԃ稫u꿥籕园삛ҍՔ˃뛅Kv|²Z⾃¦ȏԪ for doc 0 and ord 0, but
was
Build: https://builds.apache.org/job/Lucene-Solr-tests-only-trunk/10190/
1 tests failed.
FAILED: org.apache.lucene.search.TestFieldCache.test
Error Message:
Expected value
ώ¦ꢊDﬨ[宧ř˛ᑜ⟩㖅j겄ؽꚬ̋ꑩ괥I˞ﺀ쮗đמش挍\ﶙ6߭§Ş͍ɜ쭭pr㩇܊勑ꃰ}HпZ䲌㾜/v]و舄鮩잃*ڳЂD鰂䡦(Ҷ꣬bsߜG燗ɹgšz匂9︵䒮}qʰ뮠Y㉖nήŀ월֙
for
Build: https://builds.apache.org/job/Lucene-Solr-tests-only-trunk-java7/254/
1 tests failed.
FAILED: org.apache.lucene.search.TestFieldCache.test
Error Message:
Expected value ۪쯠g Hs쪺֚5¥銣̍画ѯݑＥΌכ쫏͉ה for doc 0 and ord 0, but was
룓ﻕ㟔6ʔ︣կ,댧㾤サ
Stack Trace:
junit.framework.AssertionFailedError:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2308?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13086034#comment-13086034
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-2308:
Patch looks good -- I'll commit,
Build: https://builds.apache.org/job/Lucene-Solr-tests-only-trunk/10191/
1 tests failed.
FAILED: org.apache.lucene.search.TestFieldCache.test
Error Message:
Expected value
ﱙ驞ݮͼᾲM-ㅢٙኻt4F汁ʁ﹞ｩ㪱ꏖ1ڹɔ㳛Հ驲釿콰ۤċ䴟鱹ѻٓϛ泒Ｘ~ʝ՛I(·왔Zb+ɇ-֦̈́đDﴳĬ̠̍]q긒̭ψѨDҨؖYίxЇϩԉ뼶䚅9ﰳjﶏ5ڌ⌦δۏ
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2654?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Mark Miller updated SOLR-2654:
--
Attachment: SOLR-2654.patch
I've cleaned up this patch quite a bit.
lockType/ not used consistently
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2308?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13086042#comment-13086042
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-2308:
OK I resolved the cases of
I didn't know the bulk API was so important. Which bulk API (eg the
postings one or the terms dict)?
On Mon, Aug 15, 2011 at 11:17 PM, Robert Muir rcm...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Aug 15, 2011 at 10:49 PM, Mark Miller markrmil...@gmail.com wrote:
Just throwing this out there, but:
I think it
the postings api.
On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 8:24 PM, Jason Rutherglen
jason.rutherg...@gmail.com wrote:
I didn't know the bulk API was so important. Which bulk API (eg the
postings one or the terms dict)?
On Mon, Aug 15, 2011 at 11:17 PM, Robert Muir rcm...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Aug 15,
Build: https://builds.apache.org/job/Lucene-Solr-tests-only-trunk/10192/
1 tests failed.
FAILED: org.apache.lucene.search.TestFieldCache.test
Error Message:
Expected value Ȍ꽨ݡћ静ʩܘ刂Ɋ퀌LZﺲљꋩⅅﵬˮҚɾﮑߊf騶(쳞߃Ѱ４Jfv֦黣ֵϠ0Bʹ^િ蚕꾢٫х캞ᛘ
,ꁷǹk̗ѦO怉pո9҂»ʤЁ;ɿ݆辢꠰迌ª#˄ݐ느ȢL斲掂ĽҺ for doc 0 and ord
Build: https://builds.apache.org/job/Lucene-Solr-tests-only-trunk-java7/255/
1 tests failed.
FAILED: org.apache.lucene.search.TestFieldCache.test
Error Message:
Expected value 萛ƿS_Y쵛ͳﱊ⸧車ꬴ㰽鈧ţغ緃ШǞ僚썙琶çѿ6쑃Dž㨩M厧)_⠾ ⇽䎞嵰ˤ澐aȧ
ҋҺﯖ볖w,濁酓rȝ셟ﻤﷅ〨ܵߌꏈ6謹š꣄擜Ϸpܶ筍嗁妨X\Fƾ for doc 0 and ord 0, but was
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2654?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Mark Miller updated SOLR-2654:
--
Attachment: SOLR-2654.patch
Another slightly better patch - we don't need to also track the set of all
Build: https://builds.apache.org/job/Lucene-Solr-tests-only-trunk/10193/
1 tests failed.
FAILED: org.apache.lucene.search.TestFieldCache.test
Error Message:
Expected value gm镩Ǫᥨ¢
Hmm... That one sounds like the most important hindrance to the 4.x
release. Given there's so much that's new in the release, it seems
like releasing sooner is better than waiting for all of the details to
be completed. Eg, then the release will be further delayed because of
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3354?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13086088#comment-13086088
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-3354:
-
The new multivalued test in TestFieldCache
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3354?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Robert Muir reopened LUCENE-3354:
-
reopening: there is a problem in the test
Extend FieldCache architecture to multiple Values
This test fails if NUM_ORD 2, which is the case when a
-Dtests.multiplier 1 is used.
I temporarily wired NUM_ORD to 2, and reopened/put a comment on
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3354
On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 10:01 PM, Apache Jenkins Server
jenk...@builds.apache.org wrote:
Build: https://builds.apache.org/job/Lucene-Solr-tests-only-trunk/10194/
1 tests failed.
FAILED: org.apache.solr.update.AutoCommitTest.testSoftAndHardCommitMaxTime
Error Message:
expected:2 but was:3
Stack Trace:
junit.framework.AssertionFailedError: expected:2 but was:3
at
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1768?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13086132#comment-13086132
]
Adriano Crestani commented on LUCENE-1768:
--
Hi Vinicius,
Good work, the patch
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2308?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13086144#comment-13086144
]
Nikola Tankovic commented on LUCENE-2308:
-
Great Mike, you did it all!
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2708?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13086154#comment-13086154
]
Chris Male commented on SOLR-2708:
--
Committed revision 1158525.
I'm now going to work on
Build: https://builds.apache.org/job/Lucene-Solr-tests-only-3.x/10212/
1 tests failed.
REGRESSION:
org.apache.solr.client.solrj.embedded.MultiCoreExampleJettyTest.testMultiCore
Error Message:
Index directory exists after core unload with deleteIndex=true
Stack Trace:
47 matches
Mail list logo
