Hi,
Could someone review SOLR-2923 [1]? Although the patch is a little
old, the bug still exists in trunk and the patch applies correctly.
Thank you!
1. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2923
--
Adrien
-
To unsubscri
Thank you for your warm welcome. This is a great honor for me to
become a Lucene and Solr committer.
I am a french software engineer, currently living in Paris although I
was raised near Caen in Normandy. I started to get interested in
search engines in 2008 during an internship at Exalead where I
Hi,
Lucene and Solr have a few classes that expose the size of their
instances, but with different method names. There are at least
ramBytesUsed (packed ints), sizeInBytes (FST, RamDirectory) and
memSize (Solr DocSets) that provide an estimation of the memory used
in bytes. The confusing thing is
On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 2:12 PM, Michael McCandless
wrote:
> +1 to standardize on two names. It is confusing now!
Thanks Mike for your feedback, I created LUCENE-4121 [1] to address this issue.
[1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4121
--
Adrien
--
Hi Denis,
On Sun, Jun 17, 2012 at 5:57 AM, Denis Wilson Souza Rosa
wrote:
> Do you have any sort of docs, papers or even books about the
> algorithms that were implemented?
There are really lots of different algorithms being used in Lucene.
Moreover, more and more components are being made plugg
Welcome Greg!
--
Adrien
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
On 10/08/2012 17:54, Michael McCandless wrote:> Replying to dev@
because Jira keeps being unavailable:
> Seems like we should default BlockPostingsFormat to COMPACT.
Something that worries me too is that I tried to reproduce this
benchmark (but with a lower jvmCount as I was running out of time) a
On 20/08/2012 17:28, Itamar Syn-Hershko wrote:
Hi there,
Hi Itamar,
I checked out trunk, but can't get it to compile.
I just updated my working copy and `ant compile` works fine. What
command or IDE are you using to build Lucene/Solr ?
--
Adrien
Hi Danil,
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 10:15 AM, Danil ŢORIN wrote:
> Is there a way to force run full lucene & solr test suite against my new
> Directory implementation?
>
> Just to make sure everything is covered :)
Running `ant test -Dtests.directory=my.Directory` will force your
directory impl t
Hi Uwe,
On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 1:12 PM, Uwe Schindler wrote:
> - The svn:eol property was missing
Sorry, this must be my fault. I fixed my ~/.subversion/config.
--
Adrien
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apac
Hi Uwe,
On 31/08/2012 17:53, Uwe Schindler wrote:
We can now also make BulkOperationPackedSingleBlock final like the other
classes!
Good point, it cannot hurt! I just committed.
--
Adrien Grand
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail
Sorry, looks like something went wrong in my last commit. I'll try to
fix it.
--
Adrien Grand
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
Hi Jack,
On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 10:43 PM, Jack Krupansky
wrote:
> /**
> * @return tha maximum number of chars in source field to copy to destination
> field.
> */
> public int getMaxChars() {
>
> "tha" s.b. "the".
I just committed a fix, thanks for reporting this typo.
--
Adrien
On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 3:43 PM, Robert Muir wrote:
> Whats the problem? everything works fine here (ant documentation-lint)
> with 1.6.0_26:
The problem is that some class-use HTML files are not valid (they
contain lines such as "Code to maintain and access
indices.\n" that checkJavadocsLinks.py
Smoke test passed successfully on my computer (Ubuntu 12.04.1 , locale=fr_FR).
Good that lucene-core JAR now is 2.0 MB (vs. 2.3 in 4.0-BETA).
--
Adrien
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional
Mike,
On 03/10/2012 17:35, mikemcc...@apache.org wrote:
> +if (!success) {
> + IOUtils.close(bloomIn, delegateFieldsProducer);
> +} else {
> + IOUtils.close(bloomIn);
> +}
When success is false, maybe you should use closeWhileHandlingException instead?
-
On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 2:55 PM, Robert Muir wrote:
> Can we move this CHANGES entry under the beta section?
Fixed. Thanks, Robert.
--
Adrien
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands,
Smoke tests passed on my computer.
--
Adrien
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 6:34 PM, Robert Muir wrote:
> Test2BStoredFields? :)
Funny that we found an integer overflow at the same time! But this
kind of test seems hard to implement to me (the trick in Test2BDocs
won't help...).
--
Adrien
-
On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 6:45 PM, Robert Muir wrote:
> Test2BDocs cheats and only tests IndexReader.
>
> Does compressing stored fields optimize merging with any bulk-byte
> copying? Maybe that could speed up such a test so it only takes
> minutes (like Test2BPostings)
Yes and no : probably only fo
Welcome, Alan!
Hi Uwe,
On Sun, Oct 28, 2012 at 5:25 PM, Uwe Schindler wrote:
> I don't want to use GIT; HG was horrible, too!
Why don't you like them?
--
Adrien
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional comm
On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 7:27 PM, Michael McCandless
wrote:
> I think Adrien fixed this in rev 1404456.
I hope so. :-) I just committed another fix in order to make sure to
use a FS dir for this test.
--
Adrien
-
To unsubscribe,
Hi!
I'll try to complete what Simon and Robert said:
On Thu, Nov 8, 2012 at 8:56 AM, eksdev wrote:
> Just a theoretical question, would it make sense to add some sort of
> StoredDocument[] bulkGet(int[] docId) to fetch multiple stored documents in
> one go?
>
> The reasoning behind is that now
Hi,
I just committed LUCENE-4509 [1] which changes the default
StoredFieldsFormat on trunk (backport to come on branch 4.x in a few
minutes). You should reindex.
[1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4509
--
Adrien
Hi Jack,
On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 4:06 PM, Jack Krupansky wrote:
> Hmmm... does this mean that 4.1 would REQUIRE reindexing?
>
No it doesn't. This is a notice for people who would already use the
(unreleased) Lucene41Codec for some test indexes to tell them that they
should reindex if they want
I committed a fix.
--
Adrien
Hi Shai,
On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 11:39 AM, Shai Erera wrote:
>
> what if we made it a non-test class, which takes any Codec to wrap (i.e.
> not default to Lucene41Codec)?
>
What would be the benefits of having this class vs. extending FilterCodec?
> While at that, should CompressingStoredField
Hi,
On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 11:52 AM, Shai Erera wrote:
>
> Several objects introduce a Filter/Wrapper, which essentially act as
> delegators. E.g. FilterDirectory, FilterCodec, FilterAtomicReader, and
> while not strictly a delegator - SlowCompositeReaderWrapper.
>
> I would like to rename all t
Hi,
I just modified the Lucene 4.1 stored fields format again[1]. You should
reindex.
[1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4558
--
Adrien
Hi David,
Looking at the last comments on LUCENE-4547[1], I think it has not been
decided yet whether there will be a type for multi-valued doc values or
applications will need to build it on top of binary doc values. If all your
documents have a fixed number of values, maybe an option could be to
Hi Shawn,
Tests that are known to be slow can be disabled by passing
"-Dtests.slow=false" to "ant test". Given that the zookeeper/cloud tests
are annotated with @Slow, ant test would ignore them.
--
Adrien
On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 11:11 PM, Mark Miller wrote:
> If nobody objects, I'm ready to try extending the commit bot jira
> tagger to the whole dev group.
>
Nice to have the JIRA issues automatically updated, thanks!
--
Adrien
I can reproduce the issue. I'm looking into it.
On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 5:52 PM, wrote:
> Build: builds.flonkings.com/job/Lucene-trunk-Linux-Java7-64-test-only/51588/
>
> 1 tests failed.
> REGRESSION: org.apache.lucene.search.TestFieldCache.testLongFieldCache
>
> Error Message:
> expected:<8> bu
Hi,
Lucene heavily relies on the fact that the internal doc IDs are dense
and sequential. This is at the core of Lucene's design and is the key
to compact postings lists and easily addressable doc values, stored
fields, etc... Is there a specific reason why you don't want to handle
these 16-bytes
Hi,
On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 10:36 PM, Ed Kohlwey wrote:
> There's common indexing design patterns on top of some of these databases
> where a deterministic hash is used as the primary key (in order to avoid
> locking on an id incrementer, for instance, and to make the insert
> operations idempoten
Good point Robert, I will fix it...
--
Adrien
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
+1 Artifacts look good and smoke tester was happy.
--
Adrien
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
Hi Mike,
On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 4:26 PM, Michael McCandless
wrote:
> And let me know if you get 1 or 0 results back?
Indeed, 0 as well.
> I get 0 results back but I should get 1, I think.
>
> Furthermore, if I search for:
>
> from:jenk...@thetaphi.de regression
Like Steve, I can find rece
I will dig.
--
Adrien
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
+1 Release candidate looks good and smoke tester ran successfully.
--
Adrien
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 10:19 PM, wrote:
> fix test not to generate nullreaders > 10, since it always asserts bulk reads
> from that position
Thanks Robert!
--
Adrien
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.o
Welome Cassandra!
--
Adrien
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
My bad, I'll fix it.
--
Adrien
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
Too late, Robert already fixed it! Thanks Robert!
--
Adrien
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
Hi Shai,
I think the issue is that Facet45Codec shouldn't be declared in
META-INF/services. This codec is exactly the same one as
Lucene45Codec, it only sets different defaults at writing time but
reading segments written with Lucene45 or Facet45 is exactly the same
for Lucene. We could set up dif
Hi,
On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 3:00 PM, Shai Erera wrote:
> The Codec itself may not be needed to be specified in META-INF/services, but
> the DVFormat it uses is.
Correct, because otherwise Lucene couldn't read segments written with
this DV format.
> So it's not like you can define a Codec today
Hi Thomas,
On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 2:57 PM, Thomas Matthijs wrote:
> Needs to be in services or you can't read indexes written with it afaik
This is correct in general, but in this particular case, Facet45Codec
is a sub-class of Lucene45Codec which just overrides the default doc
values formats t
On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 3:48 PM, David Smiley (@MITRE.org) <
dsmi...@mitre.org> wrote:
> RandomizedTesting for the win! Thanks a ton Dawid.
>
+1
--
Adrien
On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 4:44 PM, Uwe Schindler wrote:
> So we may need some svn-ignored extra folder, appearing in the source
> folders of the IDE, but the contents are generated by "ant eclipse".
>
+1
--
Adrien
Congratulations Sami!
--
Adrien
Hi Shai,
On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 12:21 PM, Shai Erera wrote:
> As I said, if someone volunteers to do some work on the Solr side, I will
> gladly participate in that effort.
> I just don't even know where to start w/ Solr :).
The entry point for Solr facets is
org.apache.solr.request.SimpleFacet
Hi Shai,
Thanks for your answers!
On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 5:05 PM, Shai Erera wrote:
>> the lucene module requires users to decide at indexing time what and how
>> to facet
>> whereas Solr does everything at searching time
>
> True, that's one difference between the two implementations today, ev
Hi Jack,
On Sat, Dec 15, 2012 at 4:36 PM, Jack Krupansky wrote:
> I have seen a few inquiries concerned with the overhead of storing time of
> day for simple dates. The concerns are both storage and performance. So, the
> question/proposal is whether a variant of TrieDate with no time of day
> co
On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 2:46 PM, Jack Krupansky wrote:
> Although your comment seemed to imply that the new 4.1 postings format would
> store day-style dates more efficiently - could you summarize what effects we
> could see?
My point was that the 4.1 format compresses dense postings lists much
m
Hi Jim,
You need to add lucene-analyzers-common[1] and lucene-queryparser[2]
to your POM definition.
[1]
http://search.maven.org/#search%7Cga%7C1%7Ca%3A%22lucene-analyzers-common%22
[2] http://search.maven.org/#search%7Cga%7C1%7Ca%3A%22lucene-queryparser%22
--
Adrien
---
In addition to what Dawid and Yonik said, Packed64 used to have such
optimizations but they have been removed because they were slower than
computing masks on the fly (see
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4171).
--
Adrien Grand
On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 10:45 AM, Upayavira wrote:
> I know it is a Lucene feature, but the fact that Solr now compresses stored
> fields is significant to Solr users, and IMO should be included in the Solr
> release notes.
I fixed the release year for Solr release notes and added a few lines
abo
On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 12:53 AM, Steve Rowe wrote:
> The smoke tester passes for me.
It passed for me too. +1
--
Adrien
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@luce
Actually this is a side-effect of LUCENE-5188. There is a bug in
LZ4.compressHC (which I committed to test various trade-offs between
compression speed and ratio but is not used in any official codec) on
very compressible inputs which seems to be more easily triggered now
that the inputs can be sli
Good ideas. Uwe also suggested to open an issue so that this bug fix
is in the changelog. I will do it soon...
--
Adrien
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucen
The luke request handler and your JaccardSimilarityQuery use the same
API to retrieve documents (according to the stack trace) so I'm
surprised that you see errors in one case only. Are you sure you are
looking at the same documents? If background merges happened between
your M/R job and your reque
Hi,
I was looking at the changelogs for Lucene and Solr and I think they
look pretty good. What would you think about realeasing Lucene/Solr
4.5, are there issues you would like to get in before the release?
--
Adrien
-
To unsu
Unless someone else volunteers to do the release, I'll be busy until
~wednesday next week so there are still a few days to get fixes in
anyway. However I agree with Robert that our branch_4x should always
be stable and releasable.
@Jack, @Erick could you share more details about the issues that ne
Out of curiosity, is it just for having another testing environment or
does Bamboo have useful features for us that Jenkins doesn't have?
On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 8:26 PM, Dawid Weiss
wrote:
> Do they also offer Bamboo services? This would be a nice addition to
> Jenkins... :)
>
> Dawid
>
> On Wed
Hi all,
Since everyone seems to agree this is time for a release, I created a
lucene_solr_4_5 branch in our SVN repository. From now on, please
backport to this branch all changes that should go into a Lucene/Solr
4.5 release.
I'm going to work on updating the versions in the code base, JIRA and
This is my bad, I will fix it.
On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 3:01 PM, Policeman Jenkins Server
wrote:
> Build: http://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-Solr-4.x-MacOSX/793/
> Java: 64bit/jdk1.7.0 -XX:-UseCompressedOops -XX:+UseSerialGC
>
> All tests passed
>
> Build Log:
> [...truncated 22633 lines...]
>
This should be fixed now.
On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 3:04 PM, Adrien Grand wrote:
> This is my bad, I will fix it.
>
> On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 3:01 PM, Policeman Jenkins Server
> wrote:
>> Build: http://jenkins.thetaphi.de/job/Lucene-Solr-4.x-MacOSX/793/
>>
Hi,
Versions have been updated in trunk and branch_4x. I started writing
release notes drafts[1][2] but I'm pretty sure they are terrible, feel
free to reword existing entries or add new ones for important changes.
[1] https://wiki.apache.org/lucene-java/ReleaseNote45
[2] https://wiki.apache.org/
Thanks for pointing this out, Otis!
I think the columnar nature of Parquet makes it more similar to doc
values than to stored fields, and indeed, if you look at the parquet
file-format specification [1], it is very similar to what we have for
doc values [2]. In both cases, we have
- dictionary en
Up to Lucene 4.4, CachingWrapperFilter cached filters with FixedBitSet
only by default, which sounds wasteful when the filter only matches a
few documents so I wanted to start experimenting with new
alternatives. I first worked on WAH8DocIdSet, then Paul Elschot
contributed EliasFanoDocIdSet and PF
Hi all,
Please test and vote to release the following Lucene and Solr 4.5.0 artifacts:
http://people.apache.org/~jpountz/staging_area/lucene-solr-4.5.0-RC0-rev1524484/
This vote is open until monday.
Smoke tester passed and Elasticsearch tests ran successfully with
these artifacts, so here is my
Hi,
On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 3:10 PM, Yonik Seeley wrote:
> It looks like the last commit on SOLR-4221 didn't make it on the 45
> branch. This is a change to a new API and hence needs to make it into
> 4.5
Thanks for noticing this issue, I will backport the commit.
Hoss, do you want to take adv
On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 3:40 PM, Noble Paul നോബിള് नोब्ळ्
wrote:
> I see a commit message on branch_4x for the changes I made . Isn't it the
> same branch?
I created the lucene_solr_4_5 branch last week, which I'm using to
create release candidates. The purpose was to allow people to decide
whe
Hi,
Lucene needs to load a field value entirely into memory in order to
store it, which defeats the purpose of providing a field value with a
Reader (ie. in a streaming fashion). This is why storing fields is not
supported by this constructor.
If you want your field to be stored, you need to conv
LUCENE-5223 and the missing commit from SOLR-4221 have been
backported. A new RC is currently being uploaded...
--
Adrien
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@luce
Here is a new release candidate. Difference with the previous
candidate is that this RC1 now has LUCENE-5223 as well as the missing
commit from SOLR-4221:
http://people.apache.org/~jpountz/staging_area/lucene-solr-4.5.0-RC1-rev1524755/
This vote is open until Tuesday.
Smoke tester was happy on my
Hi Chris,
On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 2:33 AM, Chris Hostetter
wrote:
> I *think* this means that we just need to backport r1522884 to the 4_5
> branch, but i don't think we need a re-spin.
Thanks for reporting this error. I agree this doesn't need a respin,
especially given that the fix is to ignor
On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 9:20 AM, Adrien Grand wrote:
> I'll backport the commit to lucene_solr_4_5.
Oh, I see you have already done that, thanks!
--
Adrien
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache
Yonik,
On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 1:52 AM, Yonik Seeley wrote:
> The fix has been committed to the 45 branch.
> Given how much pain was caused the last time the binary format changed
> (the change from modified-UTF8 to normal UTF-8), I think this warrants
> a 4.5 re-spin.
Thanks for fixing this bug
Here is a new release candidate that fixes some JavaBin codec backward
compatibility issues (SOLR-5261, SOLR-4221).
Please vote to release the following artifacts:
http://people.apache.org/~jpountz/staging_area/lucene-solr-4.5.0-RC2-rev1526012/
Smoke tester was happy on my end so here is my +1
On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 12:21 PM, Uwe Schindler wrote:
> Welcome back & heavy committing! :-)
Welcome back Wolfgang!
--
Adrien
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h.
Thanks to Markus Jelsma's thoughtful testing, other backward
compatibility issues of the JavaBin codec have been found and fixed
(SOLR-4221). Please vote to release the following artifacts:
http://people.apache.org/~jpountz/staging_area/lucene-solr-4.5.0-RC3-rev1526423/
The vote is open until T
Agreed, LUCENE-5218 seems to be worth a respin. I will also backport
LUCENE-5245 as per Simon's suggestion.
--
Adrien
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.a
Here is a new release candidate for which LUCENE-5218, LUCENE-5245 and
LUCENE-5233 have been backported. Please vote to release the following
artifacts:
http://people.apache.org/~jpountz/staging_area/lucene-solr-4.5.0-RC4-rev1526586/
This vote is open until Tuesday.
Smoke tester was happy on m
Hi Steve,
On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 9:30 PM, Steve Rowe wrote:
> I attached a fix to the issue Shawn created for the missing implicit
> Solr-core-properties-on-RELOAD issue: SOLR-5279
>
> IMHO, this regression should be fixed in 4.5.
>
> Adrien, I tried to raise you on IRC but didn't get a respons
Please vote to release the following artifacts:
http://people.apache.org/~jpountz/staging_area/lucene-solr-4.5.0-RC5-rev1527178/
Here is my +1.
--
Adrien
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additi
Thank you all for testing the release artifacts, the vote passed. I
will start the release process soon.
--
Adrien
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apac
Welcome, Joel!
--
Adrien
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
For your information, I'm having trouble uploading the Solr artifacts
to dist.apache.org[1] so there might be some delay before I announce
the release. I'll keep you informed.
[1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-6827
--
Adrien
. If that is the case, please
try another mirror. This also goes for Maven access.
--
Adrien Grand
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
oring network
for distributing releases. It is possible that the mirror you are using
may not have replicated the release yet. If that is the case, please
try another mirror. This also goes for Maven access.
--
Adrien Grand
---
On Tue, Oct 8, 2013 at 8:30 PM, Michael McCandless
wrote:
> This tells the Memory DVFormat that you're willing to waste RAM to get
> faster decode speed. However, it had no effect! Apparently, Memory
> DVFormat only uses that parameter when the number of unique values is
> small ... so I tempora
I'm pleased to announce that Ryan Ernst has accepted to join our ranks
as a committer.
Ryan has been working on a number of Lucene and Solr issues and
recently contributed the new expressions module[1] which allows for
compiling javascript expressions into SortField instances with
excellent perfor
The test confuses me, it calls bits.ensureCapacity(bit) followed by
bits.fastSet(bit), but if bit becomes the new capacity then it is by
definition out of range?
--
Adrien
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.
+1
On Sun, Oct 20, 2013 at 4:11 PM, Yonik Seeley wrote:
> +1
>
> -Yonik
>
> On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 12:31 AM, Mark Miller wrote:
>> Please vote to release the following artifacts:
>>
>> http://people.apache.org/~markrmiller/lucene_solr_4_5_1r1533280/
>>
>> Here is my +1.
>>
>> --
>> - Mark
>
> -
+1
--
Adrien
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 4:03 PM, Shai Erera wrote:
> Is there any reason to rush? We've released 4.5.0 just 3 weeks ago.
I don't think there is any reason to rush, I just like having frequent releases.
--
Adrien
-
To unsubscri
This error was due to a missing license header in DeleteReplicaTest. I
just added it.
--
Adrien
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
This specific test shouldn't run with Lucene 3.x. I'll fix the test.
On Mon, Nov 4, 2013 at 2:44 PM, wrote:
> Build: builds.flonkings.com/job/Lucene-4x-Linux-Java7-64-test-only/1930/
>
> 1 tests failed.
> REGRESSION: org.apache.lucene.analysis.TestMockAnalyzer.testChangeGaps
>
> Error Message:
1 - 100 of 6316 matches
Mail list logo
