[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-11978) include SortableTextField in _default and sample_techproducts configsets
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-11978?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16370920#comment-16370920 ] Hoss Man commented on SOLR-11978: - [~varunthacker]: i have no strong feelings – feel free to change as you see fit. > include SortableTextField in _default and sample_techproducts configsets > > > Key: SOLR-11978 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-11978 > Project: Solr > Issue Type: Sub-task > Security Level: Public(Default Security Level. Issues are Public) >Reporter: Hoss Man >Assignee: Hoss Man >Priority: Major > Fix For: master (8.0), 7.3 > > Attachments: SOLR-11978.patch > > > since SortableTextField defaults to docValues="true" it has additional on > disk overhead compared to TextField that means I don't think we should > completley replace all suggested uses of TextField at this point – but it > would still be good to include it in our configsets similar to the way we > include declarations for a variety of text analysis options. > I also think several "explicit" fields in the techproducts schema would > benefit from using this. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-11978) include SortableTextField in _default and sample_techproducts configsets
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-11978?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16370775#comment-16370775 ] Varun Thacker commented on SOLR-11978: -- Hi Hoss, At the risk of being more verbose , what do you think about changing the name to "text_general_sort" instead of "text_gen_sort" . It will then be closer to "text_general" so that users find it easy to discover it. There is a typo on line 294 as well "generaly" -> "generally" > include SortableTextField in _default and sample_techproducts configsets > > > Key: SOLR-11978 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-11978 > Project: Solr > Issue Type: Sub-task > Security Level: Public(Default Security Level. Issues are Public) >Reporter: Hoss Man >Assignee: Hoss Man >Priority: Major > Fix For: master (8.0), 7.3 > > Attachments: SOLR-11978.patch > > > since SortableTextField defaults to docValues="true" it has additional on > disk overhead compared to TextField that means I don't think we should > completley replace all suggested uses of TextField at this point – but it > would still be good to include it in our configsets similar to the way we > include declarations for a variety of text analysis options. > I also think several "explicit" fields in the techproducts schema would > benefit from using this. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-11978) include SortableTextField in _default and sample_techproducts configsets
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-11978?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16361586#comment-16361586 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on SOLR-11978: Commit b5155ffd19674917b6354ec4abf274c62f1af864 in lucene-solr's branch refs/heads/branch_7x from Chris Hostetter [ https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=lucene-solr.git;h=b5155ff ] SOLR-11978: use new SortableTextField in _default and sample_techproducts_configs configsets (cherry picked from commit 034677d5ca0e31a0f3b6bdf25661e5e84e64d06f) > include SortableTextField in _default and sample_techproducts configsets > > > Key: SOLR-11978 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-11978 > Project: Solr > Issue Type: Sub-task > Security Level: Public(Default Security Level. Issues are Public) >Reporter: Hoss Man >Assignee: Hoss Man >Priority: Major > Attachments: SOLR-11978.patch > > > since SortableTextField defaults to docValues="true" it has additional on > disk overhead compared to TextField that means I don't think we should > completley replace all suggested uses of TextField at this point – but it > would still be good to include it in our configsets similar to the way we > include declarations for a variety of text analysis options. > I also think several "explicit" fields in the techproducts schema would > benefit from using this. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-11978) include SortableTextField in _default and sample_techproducts configsets
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-11978?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16361534#comment-16361534 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on SOLR-11978: Commit 034677d5ca0e31a0f3b6bdf25661e5e84e64d06f in lucene-solr's branch refs/heads/master from Chris Hostetter [ https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=lucene-solr.git;h=034677d ] SOLR-11978: use new SortableTextField in _default and sample_techproducts_configs configsets > include SortableTextField in _default and sample_techproducts configsets > > > Key: SOLR-11978 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-11978 > Project: Solr > Issue Type: Sub-task > Security Level: Public(Default Security Level. Issues are Public) >Reporter: Hoss Man >Assignee: Hoss Man >Priority: Major > Attachments: SOLR-11978.patch > > > since SortableTextField defaults to docValues="true" it has additional on > disk overhead compared to TextField that means I don't think we should > completley replace all suggested uses of TextField at this point – but it > would still be good to include it in our configsets similar to the way we > include declarations for a variety of text analysis options. > I also think several "explicit" fields in the techproducts schema would > benefit from using this. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-11978) include SortableTextField in _default and sample_techproducts configsets
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-11978?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16361529#comment-16361529 ] Hoss Man commented on SOLR-11978: - attached a patch that i plan to commit soon. Adds {{text_gen_sort}} (using same analyzer as {{text_general}} ) to both configsets. in {{_default}} a {{}} ... identical analyzer configs isn't actaully good enough?) > include SortableTextField in _default and sample_techproducts configsets > > > Key: SOLR-11978 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-11978 > Project: Solr > Issue Type: Sub-task > Security Level: Public(Default Security Level. Issues are Public) >Reporter: Hoss Man >Assignee: Hoss Man >Priority: Major > Attachments: SOLR-11978.patch > > > since SortableTextField defaults to docValues="true" it has additional on > disk overhead compared to TextField that means I don't think we should > completley replace all suggested uses of TextField at this point – but it > would still be good to include it in our configsets similar to the way we > include declarations for a variety of text analysis options. > I also think several "explicit" fields in the techproducts schema would > benefit from using this. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org