[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-12084?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Erick Erickson resolved SOLR-12084.
-----------------------------------
    Resolution: Invalid

Please raise this question on the user's list at solr-u...@lucene.apache.org, 
see: (http://lucene.apache.org/solr/community.html#mailing-lists-irc) there are 
a _lot_ more people watching that list who may be able to help. 

If it's determined that this really is a code issue in Solr and not a 
configuration/usage problem, we can raise a new JIRA or reopen this one.


> ShingleFilter cause threads consume all available memory
> --------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: SOLR-12084
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-12084
>             Project: Solr
>          Issue Type: Bug
>      Security Level: Public(Default Security Level. Issues are Public) 
>          Components: Schema and Analysis
>    Affects Versions: 6.5, 6.5.1, 7.0.1
>            Reporter: Tanapol Nearunchorn
>            Priority: Major
>
> When putting ShingleFilter on query analyzer and after some specific query 
> patterns go through Solr, it causes all of handlers thread to hold a large 
> amount of SpanNearQuery objects and consume all available memory.
> My query analyzer looks like this:
> {code:java}
> <analyzer type="query">
>     <tokenizer class="solr.StandardTokenizerFactory" />
>     <filter class="solr.ASCIIFoldingFilterFactory" preserveOriginal="false" />
>     <filter class="solr.WordDelimiterGraphFilterFactory" preserveOriginal="0" 
> />
>     <filter class="solr.LowerCaseFilterFactory" />
>     <filter class="solr.ShingleFilterFactory" tokenSeparator="" 
> maxShingleSize="3" />
> </analyzer>{code}
> After I tested with queries, it seems that the number of terms passing to 
> ShingleFilter directly effect Solr memory usage. If ShingleFilter got 10-15 
> terms as input, it takes much memory to process the request, so multiply with 
> concurrent make problem goes worse.
> Not sure how to handle this problem, maybe we can put an upper limit number 
> of terms produced by ShingleFilter or should we optimize something?
> Thank you.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org

Reply via email to