Re: 6.4.2 release?

fix just > backported to branch_6_4 but happy to revert if there were to be any > concerns about it. > > Thanks, > Christine > > From: ichattopadhy...@gmail.com At: 02/21/17 18:05:35 > To: dev@lucene.apache.org > Cc: Christine Poerschke (BLOOMBERG/ LONDON) > Subject: Re: 6.4.2

Re: 6.4.2 release?

/ LONDON) Subject: Re: 6.4.2 release? I would like to volunteer for this 6.4.2 release. Planning to cut a RC as soon as blockers are resolved. One of the unresolved blocker issues seems to be LUCENE-7698 (I'll take a look to see if there are more). If there are more issues that should be part

Re: 6.4.2 release?

Thanks Steve for the guidance! Since LUCENE-7676 and SOLR-10083 were both (unreleased) 6.5.0 to 6.4.2 backports I have gone ahead and moved the CHANGES.txt entries on both branch_6x and master (after the branch_6_4 commit itself). My plan for https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10192 is

Re: 6.4.2 release?

Hi Christine, > On Feb 22, 2017, at 5:10 AM, Christine Poerschke (BLOOMBERG/ LONDON) > wrote: > > What process do people typically follow w.r.t. updating CHANGES.txt on > branch_6x and master in those circumstances e.g. do the entries move from the > 6.5 to the

Re: 6.4.2 release?

> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7676> >> FilterCodecReader to override more super-class methods >> >> The former had narrowly missed the 6.4.1 release. >> >> Regards, >> >>

Re: 6.4.2 release?

* https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7676 >> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7676> >> FilterCodecReader to override more super-class methods >> >> The former had narrowly missed the 6.4.1 release. >> &

Re: 6.4.2 release?

s.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10083> >> Fix instanceof check in ConstDoubleSource.equals >> >> * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7676 >> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7676> >>

Re: 6.4.2 release?

t; At: 02/15/17 14:27:52 To: dev@lucene.apache.org Subject: Re:6.4.2 release? Hi devs, These two issues seem serious enough to warrant a new release from branch_6_4: * SOLR-10130: Serious perfor

Re: 6.4.2 release?

equals >> >> * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7676 >> FilterCodecReader to override more super-class methods >> >> The former had narrowly missed the 6.4.1 release. >> >> Regards, >> >> Christine >> >> From: dev@lucene.apa

Re: 6.4.2 release?

the 6.4.1 release. > > Regards, > > Christine > > From: dev@lucene.apache.org At: 02/15/17 14:27:52 > To: dev@lucene.apache.org > Subject: Re:6.4.2 release? > > Hi devs, > > These two issues seem serious enough to warrant a new release from > branch_6_4: > * SOLR-1

Re: 6.4.2 release?

super-class methods The former had narrowly missed the 6.4.1 release. Regards, Christine From: dev@lucene.apache.org At: 02/15/17 14:27:52 To: dev@lucene.apache.org Subject: Re:6.4.2 release? Hi devs, These two issues seem serious enough to warrant a new release from branch_6_4: * SOLR-10

Re: 6.4.2 release?

-class methods > > The former had narrowly missed the 6.4.1 release. > > Regards, > > Christine > > From: dev@lucene.apache.org At: 02/15/17 14:27:52 > To: dev@lucene.apache.org > Subject: Re:6.4.2 release? > > Hi devs, > > These two issues seem serious

Re:6.4.2 release?

missed the 6.4.1 release. Regards, Christine From: dev@lucene.apache.org At: 02/15/17 14:27:52 To: dev@lucene.apache.org Subject: Re:6.4.2 release? Hi devs, These two issues seem serious enough to warrant a new release from branch_6_4: * SOLR-10130: Serious performance degradation in Solr 6.4.1 due