Releasing 5.3.2

2016-01-23 Thread Anshum Gupta
Hi,

I am about to work on the website changes and add news etc. for the 5.3.2
release but that would also mean that the default download link changes to
5.3.2 from 5.4.1. I'm not sure if that's a good idea.

We haven't really run into this issue before so I'm thinking about not
changing that link as part of the release process in such cases. What do
you guys think?

-- 
Anshum Gupta


Re: Releasing 5.3.2

2016-01-23 Thread Steve Rowe
The download link should always be the latest point release from the latest
major/minor release, so +1 to keep it at 5.4.1.

--
Steve
www.lucidworks.com

On Saturday, January 23, 2016, Anshum Gupta  wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I am about to work on the website changes and add news etc. for the 5.3.2
> release but that would also mean that the default download link changes to
> 5.3.2 from 5.4.1. I'm not sure if that's a good idea.
>
> We haven't really run into this issue before so I'm thinking about not
> changing that link as part of the release process in such cases. What do
> you guys think?
>
> --
> Anshum Gupta
>