Re: When did we stop shipping changes.html?

Ok, good to know it was intentional. Thank you for clarification, Alex. On 13 April 2018 at 08:56, Jan Høydahl wrote: > We DO ship/distribute Changes.html, see > http://www-us.apache.org/dist/lucene/solr/7.3.0/ in the changes folder > But inside the tarball there is

Re: When did we stop shipping changes.html?

We DO ship/distribute Changes.html, see http://www-us.apache.org/dist/lucene/solr/7.3.0/ in the changes folder But inside the tarball there is only an index.html file linking to the online versions, e.g. http://lucene.apache.org/solr/7_3_0/changes/Changes.html That was intentional. CHANGES.txt

Re: When did we stop shipping changes.html?

I won’t speak for Jan and Uwe who worked on the patches there, but my feeling is that it was specifically intended - the CHANGES entry for SOLR-9450 says as much. Changes.html & associated files are built with the same ant target (“documentation”) that builds javadocs. I think it was assumed

Re: When did we stop shipping changes.html?

The scope of that JIRA was Javadocs specifically. Wouldn't loosing other files, such as changes.html be an unintended consequences then? Regards, Alex. On 12 April 2018 at 16:07, Cassandra Targett wrote: > I believe it was in 6.5, with >

Re: When did we stop shipping changes.html?

I believe it was in 6.5, with https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9450 . > On Apr 12, 2018, at 2:45 PM, Alexandre Rafalovitch wrote: > > The Solr's doc folder is suddenly looking scarily empty. > > Specifically, the

When did we stop shipping changes.html?

The Solr's doc folder is suddenly looking scarily empty. Specifically, the changes.html now seems to be only online. That quite surprised me. Not that I am in love with the current changes.txt or changes.html for my usual use case (finding when something became available), but still. Worse, I