Actually, yes there is one, although I am not sure this is the right forum for
it. I have just completed a .NET port of version 3.2.0 of the BoboBrowse
faceted search engine, which is implemented on top of Lucene.Net, and
compatible with Lucene.Net 3.0.3.
NuGet package (pre-release): https://ww
ultimately used to fix
(or not fix) CharArraySet might end up changing the public API of CharArraySet.
Other than that, I don't see any real issues that are holding up the release
here. Thoughts?
Shad Storhaug/NightOwl888
Is anyone working on porting over Suggest? I'd like to take a crack at it.
Thanks,
Shad Storhaug/NightOwl888
r/src/Lucene.Net.Suggest :)
--
Itamar Syn-Hershko
http://code972.com | @synhershko <https://twitter.com/synhershko> Freelance
Developer & Consultant Lucene.NET committer and PMC member
On Sat, Aug 27, 2016 at 11:49 AM, Shad Storhaug
wrote:
> Is anyone working on porting over Suggest? I'd
ly, I think the second option is the best one, let me know if that is
your feeling as well.
Thanks,
Shad Storhaug/NightOwl888
-Original Message-
From: itamar.synhers...@gmail.com [mailto:itamar.synhers...@gmail.com] On
Behalf Of Itamar Syn-Hershko
Sent: Sunday, August 28, 201
ctionality of applications that are currently using that property.
For now, I will quit working on Collation. Hopefully, you can use some of this
to finish the implementation.
Thanks,
Shad Storhaug/NightOwl888
@NightOwl888<https://github.com/NightOwl888> I didnt see your message until
j
he code over into Lucene.Net is a
better option than setting a reference to a library so we have better control
over how .NET core-compatible the code is and so we don't take on another
dependency.
Thanks,
Shad Storhaug/NightOwl888
-Original Message-
From: itamar.synhers...@gm
ese are all sweeping changes that will
affect everyone helping out on Lucene.Net and anyone who is currently using the
beta. So, I just wanted to gather some input on when the most appropriate time
to begin working on these sweeping changes would be?
Thanks,
Shad Storhaug (NightOwl888)
nfo).
As for the culture, in .NET I am pretty sure that we need to pass it as a
parameter to another overload of `QueryParser.Parse` rather than making it a
property of QueryParser. But we can deal with that in one step after you have
finished porting.
--
Shad Storhaug (NightOwl888)
--
orking. Can someone look into that please?
Thanks,
Shad Storhaug (NightOwl888)
-----Original Message-
From: Shad Storhaug
Sent: Wednesday, October 5, 2016 8:23 PM
To: dev@lucenenet.apache.org
Cc: Connie Yau; 'cri...@gmail.com'
Subject: RE: Remaining Work/Priorities
> Analysis
tract, which can often be a suitable replacement for
an interface.
Shad Storhaug (NightOwl888)
Hey Shad,
Sorry for not responding sooner. The last few weeks have been pretty crazy
for me (vacation and now a production release at work) so I haven't had a
chance to look into
on so
the only reasonable way for the class to read it is to make it static.
Thanks,
Shad Storhaug (NightOwl888)
-Original Message-
From: itamar.synhers...@gmail.com [mailto:itamar.synhers...@gmail.com] On
Behalf Of Itamar Syn-Hershko
Sent: Thursday, October 13, 2016 12:09
can for types.
So, what would be the most logical default behavior for DefaultInstanceLoader?
Is there an alternative way of ordering the assemblies and/or types that we
should consider?
Shad Storhaug (NightOwl888)
ev mailing list
dev-subscr...@lucenenet.apache.org, checkout the contributing section:
https://github.com/apache/lucenenet/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md, and coordinate
with a PMC member on the dev mailing list to state what you want to work on to
avoid work duplication with other team members
rser.Flexible
Please clarify, are you working on QueryParser.Flexible, or not? If not, I
would like to fix the context issues in the tests over there ASAP to eliminate
the false negatives.
Thanks,
Shad Storhaug (NightOwl888)
-Original Message-----
From: Shad Storhaug
Sent: Wednesday, Octob
to master.
We certainly wouldn't want every CI build up on NuGet, though. We need to be
able to manually push at certain stable points. What is the plan?
Thanks,
Shad Storhaug (NightOwl888)
-Original Message-
From: Prescott Nasser [mailto:geobmx...@hotmail.com]
Sent: Saturday, October
ions - you might also want query Google about using
ICU4NET in an IIS hosted application, or perhaps something more general about
having a dependency with ICU4NET's particular architecture (not sure what that
is, exactly).
Thanks,
Shad Storhaug (NightOwl888)
-Original Message-
From
one another. These dependencies are still a WIP in some cases. It would be nice
if the devs had some control over how the NuGet packages are generated so we
could keep them up to date with the codebase (dependencies, descriptions, etc).
Thanks,
Shad Storhaug (NightOwl888)
-Original Mess
that
has not been ported yet, but I am not sure it is in any way relevant to this.
Thanks,
Shad Storhaug (NightOwl888)
-Original Message-
From: Roethinger, Alexander [mailto:aroethin...@affili.net]
Sent: Thursday, November 3, 2016 8:15 PM
To: dev@lucenenet.apache.org
Subject: AW
Alexander,
BTW - I noticed the method is protected virtual. Perhaps there is a way to
override it and change the behavior?
Thanks,
Shad Storhaug (NightOwl888)
-Original Message-
From: Shad Storhaug
Sent: Thursday, November 3, 2016 8:39 PM
To: 'aroethin...@affili.net
issues with auto-loading), that
would be great.
Thanks,
Shad Storhaug (NightOwl888)
From: Roethinger, Alexander [mailto:aroethin...@affili.net]
Sent: Thursday, November 3, 2016 9:37 PM
To: dev@lucenenet.apache.org
Subject: ICU4NET 64bit?
Dear Devs,
can anyone point me to the source-code (if
of the assembly level attributes in the
AssemblyInfo.cs files. Does that get you to where you want to be?
On Thu, Nov 3, 2016 at 9:19 AM Shad Storhaug wrote:
> Wyatt,
>
> No it doesn't for two reasons:
>
> 1. This is a port of Lucene, and we are doing our best to make our
&g
eems much more impressive in a demo.
5. Perhaps there should be some way to reset the index? I entered another
organization to test my updates to the code and it added that organization's
results to the original index, which I wasn't expecting.
Thanks,
Shad Storhaug (NightOwl888)
--
providing overloads that don't have them so they are not required.
Thanks,
Shad Storhaug (NightOwl888)
-Original Message-
From: itamar.synhers...@gmail.com [mailto:itamar.synhers...@gmail.com] On
Behalf Of Itamar Syn-Hershko
Sent: Thursday, November 10, 2016 10:27 AM
To: dev@lucen
Itamar Syn-Hershko
http://code972.com | @synhershko <https://twitter.com/synhershko> Freelance
Developer & Consultant Lucene.NET committer and PMC member
On Wed, Nov 9, 2016 at 11:07 PM, Shad Storhaug
wrote:
> Itamar,
>
> I think for those rare cases, we should leave i
k to randomize codec, culture, and time zone, but once those issues are
fixed we should have most of the bugs out, and can begin working on any
cross-platform issues that remain.
Thanks,
Shad Storhaug (NightOwl888)
-Original Message-
From: itamar.synhers...@gmail.com [mailto:itamar.synh
port we need in icu.net?
Thanks,
Shad Storhaug (NightOwl888)
-Original Message-
From: Connie Yau [mailto:conn...@microsoft.com]
Sent: Friday, November 11, 2016 6:01 AM
To: Itamar Syn-Hershko; dev@lucenenet.apache.org
Subject: RE: ICU4NET 64bit?
Hi,
I apologise for the delayed response. I
nctionality ported in icu-dotnet in order to make the library complete enough
to fully support Lucene.Net.
Thanks,
Shad Storhaug (NightOwl888)
P.S. After you submitted #191, the first thing I did was attempt to use
icu-dotnet in a standalone project to test some of its features. However, I
couldn&#x
mentioned he likes FAKE, care to elaborate on its feature set?
Thanks,
Shad Storhaug (NightOwl888)
-Original Message-
From: Wyatt Barnett [mailto:wyatt.barn...@gmail.com]
Sent: Saturday, November 12, 2016 12:34 AM
To: dev@lucenenet.apache.org
Cc: Prescott Nasser
Subject: Re: nuget.or
om/synhershko> Freelance
Developer & Consultant Lucene.NET committer and PMC member
On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 9:32 AM, Shad Storhaug
wrote:
> I realize that - we wouldn't want to make them optional anyway because
> that would not be CLS compliant (which we may never fully achieve
me access to
the feed so I can work with it (username nightowl888). If you are leaving it to
me, I will just make you a feed owner - let me know.
The plan is to make a pre-release of Spatial4n on NuGet so it will be ready for
when we get the pre-release of Lucene.Net on NuGet.
Thanks,
Sha
so when the latest version is
available it will be needed by users.
Thanks,
Shad Storhaug (NightOwl888)
-Original Message-
From: Connie Yau [mailto:conn...@microsoft.com]
Sent: Tuesday, December 6, 2016 1:30 AM
To: dev@lucenenet.apache.org
Subject: All builds failing on TeamCity
Hi,
I
ses rather than discard them.
BTW - Could you make me owner of the Spatial4n.Core.NTS NuGet package
(https://www.nuget.org/packages/Spatial4n.Core.NTS/) so I can also push that
one to NuGet?
Thanks,
Shad Storhaug (NightOwl888)
-Original Message-
From: itamar.synhers...@gmail.com [mailto
ations again. Instead, let's
aim for making Lucene.Net into the de-facto standard full-text search engine
that is (mysteriously) missing from the .NET framework.
Thoughts? Ideas?
Thanks,
Shad Storhaug (NightOwl888)
P. S. Itamar - can we get an update as to the status of the new we
ic what is being done
in Java. Namely, it doesn't use sequential file names, they are based on a
random hash of characters.
Thanks,
Shad Storhaug (NightOwl888)
-Original Message-
From: Van Den Berghe, Vincent [mailto:vincent.vandenber...@bvdinfo.com]
Sent: Monday, January 2, 2017
.
- Lucene.Net.Analysis.Th.TestThaiAnalyzer.TestRandomHugeStrings
- Lucene.Net.Index.TestByteSlices
- Lucene.Net.Search.TestSearchAfter.TestQueries
- Lucene.Net.Util.Fst.TestFSTs.TestRandomWords
Thanks,
Shad Storhaug (NightOwl888)
-Original Message-
From: itamar.synhers...@gmail.com [mailto:itamar.synhers...@gmail.com] On
ign that could break tests that don't
currently run.
Thanks,
Shad Storhaug (NightOwl888)
-Original Message-
From: Prescott Nasser [mailto:geobmx...@hotmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, January 31, 2017 3:12 PM
To: dev@lucenenet.apache.org
Subject: RE: Lucene.net file I/O inefficiency an
the issues you are seeing. If you have any spare time, your help would be
appreciated on these as well.
Thanks,
Shad Storhaug (NightOwl888)
-Original Message-
From: Van Den Berghe, Vincent [mailto:vincent.vandenber...@bvdinfo.com]
Sent: Tuesday, February 7, 2017 6:00 PM
To: dev@
e redesigned.
Please keep sending the issues (or fixes) our way.
Thanks,
Shad Storhaug (NightOwl888)
-Original Message-
From: Shad Storhaug
Sent: Wednesday, February 1, 2017 11:23 AM
To: 'vincent.vandenber...@bvdinfo.com'
Cc: dev@lucenenet.apache.org
Subject: RE: Lucene.net fil
Fixed culture-sensitive comparison and sort order issues when using
strings in Lucene.Net.Core and Lucene.Net.Codecs.
6. Merged similar functionality in Support into the same class and
deleted several unused Support classes.
7. Made the API CLS compliant, so it now works with all .NET languages.
Shad Storhaug (NightOwl888)
be a big prize.
Thanks,
Shad Storhaug (NightOwl888)
-Original Message-
From: Van Den Berghe, Vincent [mailto:vincent.vandenber...@bvdinfo.com]
Sent: Tuesday, March 21, 2017 8:51 PM
To: Shad Storhaug
Cc: dev@lucenenet.apache.org
Subject: RE: Bug in Lucene static initialization with mul
e 2 of them call MoveNext() and one beats
the other to read Current and reap in a race condition (it does this by
throwing an exception in Java). I will attempt to get it working this way, but
at least now we can settle for just passing instead of ideal behavior if we
can't get it to work e
nyway, I am going to keep poking at it to see if I can spot the cause(s), and
would appreciate any (more) help you can provide.
Thanks again,
Shad Storhaug (NightOwl888)
-Original Message-
From: Van Den Berghe, Vincent [mailto:vincent.vandenber...@bvdinfo.com]
Sent: Wednesday, March
p the
test. Of course you would always use using blocks in production code, but you
have to take into consideration these tests were written by the insane.
Even if you don't fix the test with using blocks, running the test again
usually bypasses this message and gets you to another one.
Thanks
ing the value of the wrapped ICollector.
This is the only difference between the test that always passes and the one
that randomly fails. So, either somebody is lying that they accept docs out of
order (anybody who returns true is suspect), or the code that accepts the docs
out of order is mu
it or broke it more, but it is definitely behaving
differently now.
Now, let me see if I can bring your other changes into my universe...perhaps
the new failure has something to do with the reset event.
Thanks,
Shad Storhaug (NightOwl888)
From: Van Den Berghe, Vincent [mailto:vincent.vandenber
Vincent,
You have me convinced that I would rather be working on version 4.9 so I
wouldn't have to deal with it :).
Shad Storhaug (NightOwl888)
-Original Message-
From: Van Den Berghe, Vincent [mailto:vincent.vandenber...@bvdinfo.com]
Sent: Thursday, March 23, 2017 8:00 PM
To:
Array.Copy(chars, result, w);
return result;
}
Anyway, if you think we need to adjust the threshold or if you have any other
suggestions, let me know.
Thanks,
Shad Storhaug (NightOwl888)
-Original Message-
From: Van Den Berghe, Vincent [mailto:vincent.vandenber...@bvdinfo.com]
Vincent,
I put the GetHashCode() fix into both ValueList and ValueHashSet. You
unwittingly reverted it back to its original Java state.
Thanks,
Shad Storhaug (NightOwl888)
From: Van Den Berghe, Vincent [mailto:vincent.vandenber...@bvdinfo.com]
Sent: Thursday, March 23, 2017 9:57 PM
To: dev
nificant to
fix. So, still broken (sometimes).
Thanks,
Shad Storhaug (NightOwl888)
-Original Message-
From: Shad Storhaug [mailto:s...@shadstorhaug.com]
Sent: Thursday, March 23, 2017 8:25 PM
To: Van Den Berghe, Vincent; dev@lucenenet.apache.org
Cc: dev@lucenenet.ap
it's probably
not worth the effort anyway (I have already spent several days chasing after
that one).
Thanks,
Shad Storhaug (NightOwl888)
-Original Message-
From: Van Den Berghe, Vincent [mailto:vincent.vandenber...@bvdinfo.com]
Sent: Friday, March 24, 2017 4:40 PM
To: Shad
City to work on it?
Thanks,
Shad Storhaug (NightOwl888)
From: Shad Storhaug
Sent: Tuesday, March 21, 2017 5:25 AM
To: 'dev@lucenenet.apache.org'
Subject: API Work/Stabilization Update
I am getting very close to getting #203 merged. I wouldn't go so far as to say
that the
iced
that there are still tests in Analysis.Common that can cause it to crash. I
haven't investigated if there is a setting in NUnit to increase the buffer
size, which might be a better fix, but I could probably track down the rest of
the tests that are causing this before the me
of those. WDYT?
Shad
-Original Message-
From: Van Den Berghe, Vincent [mailto:vincent.vandenber...@bvdinfo.com]
Sent: Saturday, March 25, 2017 12:37 AM
To: Shad Storhaug
Cc: dev@lucenenet.apache.org
Subject: RE: TestSearcherManager_Mem
Hello Shad,
I'd love to give you hope for
BTW - someone wrote a several tests for EquatableList that are in the repo (in
the support directory), but are not currently part of the project that we might
be able to make use of. I think it is a carry-over from Lucene.Net 3.0.3.
-Original Message-
From: Shad Storhaug
Sent: Saturday
ool features
of .NET to make the design easier to work with. But for that, we will need to
pool ideas.
Thanks,
Shad Storhaug (NightOwl888)
-Original Message-
From: Van Den Berghe, Vincent [mailto:vincent.vandenber...@bvdinfo.com]
Sent: Saturday, March 25, 2017 2:34 AM
To: Shad Storhaug
C
be the problem, but it is definitely a suspect.
Thanks,
Shad Storhaug (NightOwl888)
-Original Message-
From: Van Den Berghe, Vincent [mailto:vincent.vandenber...@bvdinfo.com]
Sent: Saturday, March 25, 2017 2:34 AM
To: Shad Storhaug
Cc: dev@lucenenet.apache.org
Subject: RE: TestSearch
projects compile for .NET 4.5.1 already.
So I think the aim is to eventually eliminate those .csproj files (and for that
matter .nuspec files) and use strictly .json files for project configuration
going forward.
Thanks,
Shad Storhaug (NightOwl888)
-Original Message-
From: Wyatt
constructor of
the RegExp class). Still investigating...
Shad
-Original Message-
From: Shad Storhaug [mailto:s...@shadstorhaug.com]
Sent: Saturday, March 25, 2017 1:59 PM
To: Van Den Berghe, Vincent
Cc: dev@lucenenet.apache.org
Subject: RE: TestSearcherManager_Mem
Vincent,
I took a look
none of those suits you there are some more unfinished tasks in the
"known issues" here:
http://apache.markmail.org/search/?q=from%3A%22Shad+Storhaug%22#query:from%3A%22Shad%20Storhaug%22+page:1+mid:s5imh7pkncfphszs+state:results
Thanks,
Shad Storhaug (NightOwl888)
-Original Message
art slogging through getting the new build working. In the
> > interests of full disclosure I'm working an event the last week and
> > a half of April and will be completely out of pocket then. But I'm about
> > otherwise.
> >
> > On Sat, Mar 25, 2017 at 10
50% done. I could use
some help getting them fixed so they are at least visible in Visual Studio
intellisense. See the latest status on #203. And then of course we can use them
to generate new documents.
Thanks,
Shad Storhaug (NightOwl888)
-Original Message-
From: Wyatt Barnett [mailto:
https://www.nuget.org/packages/Spatial4n.Core/ is on. NTS is not required by
Lucene.Net, but it is required for anyone who needs to run the tests.
-Original Message-
From: Shad Storhaug [mailto:s...@shadstorhaug.com]
Sent: Saturday, April 1, 2017 5:31 AM
To: dev@lucenenet.apache.org
Subjec
--Original Message-----
From: Shad Storhaug [mailto:s...@shadstorhaug.com]
Sent: Saturday, April 1, 2017 5:31 AM
To: dev@lucenenet.apache.org
Subject: RE: API Work/Stabilization Update
Wyatt,
Great. Yea, actually after I sent my last email I was starting to wonder if
Connie ever tested the buil
hould be running
in release mode. They would not even run in debug if I recall correctly. Let me
know how the switch works and I'll make sure I'm throwing it on the build
server side.
On Fri, Mar 31, 2017 at 6:56 PM Shad Storhaug wrote:
> I don't necessarily need ownership acce
.1 runtimes
will be installed on the server?
2. Can we install the .NET Core SDK on the server, or is our only option to
find out if the tools we need are portable (I can't imagine they are not, but
you never know)?
Thanks,
Shad Storhaug (NightOwl888)
-Original Message
parameters that you would otherwise
have to set on runbuild.ps1 in order to run all of the tests for both .NET
Framework and .NET Core
Thanks,
Shad Storhaug (NightOwl888)
-Original Message-
From: Shad Storhaug [mailto:s...@shadstorhaug.com]
Sent: Sunday, April 2, 2017 4:10 PM
To: wyatt.
NG: Could not find TestResult.xml.
Testing [Lucene.Net.Tests.Analysis.Common] on [net451]...
dotnet.exe test --configuration Release --framework net451 --no-build
Project
'F:\Projects\lucenenet\src\Lucene.Net.Tests.Analysis.Common\project.json' does
not support framework: net451
WARNING:
BTW – I created an account at TeamCity.
NightOwl888 / s...@shadstorhaug.com<mailto:s...@shadstorhaug.com>
From: Wyatt Barnett [mailto:wyatt.barn...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, April 5, 2017 3:41 AM
To: Shad Storhaug
Cc: Connie Yau; dev@lucenenet.apache.org
Subject: Re: API Work/Stabili
script for this (at least for .NET 4.5.1) and set it up using
TeamCity tools?
Thanks,
Shad Storhaug (NightOwl888)
-Original Message-
From: Shad Storhaug [mailto:s...@shadstorhaug.com]
Sent: Wednesday, April 5, 2017 1:10 PM
To: Wyatt Barnett
Cc: Connie Yau; dev@lucenenet.apache.org
Subject:
g this setup so tests can be run as separate steps.
Thanks,
Shad Storhaug (NightOwl888)
-----Original Message-
From: Shad Storhaug [mailto:s...@shadstorhaug.com]
Sent: Wednesday, April 5, 2017 8:42 PM
To: Wyatt Barnett
Cc: Connie Yau; dev@lucenenet.apache.org
Subject: RE: API Work/Sta
nging to 4.8.0 - note that it is not "portable", though).
I would be happy to do it if someone would give me access. Or, if there are any
suggestions on other ways to categorize issues belonging to these sub-projects
without creating so many individual components, I am open to ideas.
permission (and knowledge)
to do, why not?
-Original Message-
From: Shad Storhaug [mailto:s...@shadstorhaug.com]
Sent: Thursday, April 6, 2017 1:26 PM
To: dev@lucenenet.apache.org
Subject: JIRA Issue Tracker - Needs Updates
Hello,
I am just getting started with the JIRA issue tracker. I noticed
could you please give me ownership to the
https://www.nuget.org/packages/Spatial4n.Core.NTS/ feed, so I can upload the
beta of Spatial4n.Core.NTS there?
Thanks,
Shad Storhaug (NightOwl888)
-Original Message-
From: itamar.synhers...@gmail.com [mailto:itamar.synhers...@gmail.com] On
Beha
Tracker - Needs Updates
Wayne is typically my alter ego after the 10th cocktail. Did he show up? :)
I updated in another thread but the build server permissions are taken care of.
On Thu, Apr 6, 2017 at 6:11 AM Shad Storhaug wrote:
> All I am saying is, it is YET ANOTHER account people have
d but the build server permissions are taken care of.
On Thu, Apr 6, 2017 at 6:11 AM Shad Storhaug wrote:
> All I am saying is, it is YET ANOTHER account people have to sign up for.
> It seems like a lot of friction could be removed here for people who
> want to help out. It is difficult
having to set lots of
different Boolean flags to tell it what to run and what not to.
From: Wyatt Barnett [mailto:wyatt.barn...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, April 6, 2017 6:20 PM
To: Shad Storhaug
Cc: Connie Yau; dev@lucenenet.apache.org
Subject: Re: API Work/Stabilization Update
Hi Shad -- you now
: Wyatt Barnett [mailto:wyatt.barn...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, April 7, 2017 1:30 AM
To: Shad Storhaug
Cc: Connie Yau; dev@lucenenet.apache.org
Subject: Re: API Work/Stabilization Update
Good question Shad. I think I de-escaped things properly -- the powershell
command it is running is
ehave, and this is the only way to "fix it once".
Anyway, I am trying to start another build to see how many tests are left to
fix, but it seems that there are no longer any connected compatible agents that
can run it. Wyatt, can you check into this please?
Thanks,
Shad Storhaug (Ni
st one.
Thanks,
Shad Storhaug (NightOwl888)
-Original Message-----
From: Shad Storhaug [mailto:s...@shadstorhaug.com]
Sent: Saturday, April 8, 2017 11:18 PM
To: Wyatt Barnett
Cc: Connie Yau; dev@lucenenet.apache.org
Subject: RE: API Work/Stabilization Update
I finally got a build to run all the
package out to MyGet. Or set one of the
builds up to fail the other if it fails. Any ideas?
Thanks,
Shad Storhaug (NightOwl888)
From: Wyatt Barnett [mailto:wyatt.barn...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, April 11, 2017 1:26 AM
To: Shad Storhaug
Cc: Connie Yau; dev@lucenenet.apache.org
Subject: Re: API Work
difference
if we promote to NuGet from TeamCity or from MyGet (although if we use MyGet we
don’t have to configure anything extra to do it).
From: Wyatt Barnett [mailto:wyatt.barn...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, April 11, 2017 1:39 AM
To: Shad Storhaug
Cc: Connie Yau; dev@lucenenet.apache.org
Subject: Re
:46 AM
To: Shad Storhaug
Cc: Connie Yau; dev@lucenenet.apache.org
Subject: Re: API Work/Stabilization Update
Sorry for the confusion. Having me take a stab at it sounds good, when would
you be expecting turnaround?
Totally agree on one true, consistent version stream. I would hit it slightly
when the last phase ends, I can work on the script and
fixing remaining build problems. BTW – would it be better to merge api-work to
master sooner or later? Is there anything we need to shut down first?
Thanks,
Shad Storhaug (NightOwl888)
From: Wyatt Barnett [mailto:wyatt.barn...@gmail.com]
Sent
e issues.
-Original Message-
From: Shad Storhaug [mailto:s...@shadstorhaug.com]
Sent: Tuesday, April 11, 2017 11:45 PM
To: Wyatt Barnett
Cc: Connie Yau; dev@lucenenet.apache.org
Subject: RE: API Work/Stabilization Update
Wyatt,
I am familiar with TeamCity’s approach to versioning – and it
est if
we did it that way.
Thanks,
Shad Storhaug (NightOwl888)
-Original Message-
From: Shad Storhaug [mailto:s...@shadstorhaug.com]
Sent: Wednesday, April 12, 2017 1:23 AM
To: Wyatt Barnett
Cc: Connie Yau; dev@lucenenet.apache.org
Subject: RE: API Work/Stabilization Update
It looks like t
call it 4.80.
Therefore, 4.8.0.999-beta2 would become 4.80.999-beta2.
Thoughts? Alternatives?
-----Original Message-
From: Shad Storhaug [mailto:s...@shadstorhaug.com]
Sent: Thursday, April 13, 2017 12:44 AM
To: Wyatt Barnett
Cc: Connie Yau; dev@lucenenet.apache.org
Subject: RE: API Work
mVer compliant. I just hope it isn't that
confusing. But if you have any other ideas that don't lock us into "we're never
gonna patch this because our version would no longer match Lucene", let me know.
Thanks,
Shad Storhaug (NightOwl888)
-Original Message-
Fro
e already know that all of our releases *should* be
backward-compatible patches. So, my thought is just to slide over Lucene's
patch number so we can apply ours (4.80.patch). After all, we ARE patching
their patch. But if there is a more intuitive solution than this, please
enlighten me.
t we can communicate 1) Lucene
version 2) pre-release 3) patch version, and I think this covers all of those
cases.
Thoughts?
Thanks,
Shad Storhaug (NightOwl888)
-Original Message-
From: Olivier Spinelli [mailto:olivier.spine...@invenietis.com]
Sent: Tuesday, April 18, 2017 3:36 PM
To:
on this setup
(https://teamcity.jetbrains.com/project.html?projectId=LuceneNet_PortableBuilds&tab=projectOverview).
Thanks,
Shad Storhaug (NightOwl888)
-Original Message-
From: Shad Storhaug [mailto:s...@shadstorhaug.com]
Sent: Tuesday, April 18, 2017 7:21 PM
To: Olivier Spinelli
C
Hello again,
Just wondering if someone could either update JIRA or give me permission to
update it. We are ready to push the BETA to NuGet and we really should have the
issue tracker optimized to track bugs...
Thanks,
Shad Storhaug (NightOwl888)
-Original Message-
From: Shad Storhaug
.org/gallery/lucene-net-ci, so we won't
be able to put them onto the same feed with the existing packages.
The new TeamCity setup:
https://teamcity.jetbrains.com/project.html?projectId=LuceneNet_PortableBuilds
And the branch to be merged: https://github.com/apache/lucenenet/tree/api-work
tFramework
Thanks,
Shad Storhaug (NightOwl888)
-Original Message-
From: Stefan Bodewig [mailto:bode...@apache.org]
Sent: Sunday, April 23, 2017 11:10 PM
To: dev@lucenenet.apache.org
Subject: Re: JIRA Issue Tracker - Needs Updates
On 2017-04-23, Shad Storhaug wrote:
> Stefan,
>>
, but it had no effect.
Thanks,
Shad Storhaug (NightOwl888)
onalVersion. While I did that mainly to correlate the CI
builds to a commit without tagging every build, it seems it would also come in
handy if there is a delay between when the binary is generated and when the tag
is applied to the repository.
Thanks,
Shad Storhaug (NightOwl888)
-Origi
cause the previous
versioning scheme chosen wasn't compatible with .NET Core. So we had to revert
to a new (lower) version range. You can access the packages at
https://www.myget.org/gallery/lucene-net-ci, and they now support .NET Standard
1.5.
Thanks,
Shad Storhaug (NightOwl888)
-
en a flurry
of activity around Connie's recent pull request
(https://github.com/sillsdev/icu-dotnet/pull/37).
But since beta means a small subset of our users, and International means a
small subset of those users, it isn't likely there will be many complaints.
Thanks,
S
12 Apache-Lucene.Net-4.8.0-beta1.src.zip >
Apache-Lucene.Net-4.8.0-beta1.src.zip.sha
gpg --print-md SHA512 Apache-Lucene.Net-4.8.0-beta1.bin.zip >
Apache-Lucene.Net-4.8.0-beta1.bin.zip.sha
Thanks,
Shad Storhaug (NightOwl888)
-Original Message-
From: Stefan Bodewig [m
there any
way to tell if the server has had .NET Core SDKs installed or uninstalled
recently?
-Original Message-
From: Stefan Bodewig [mailto:bode...@apache.org]
Sent: Wednesday, April 26, 2017 8:12 PM
To: dev@lucenenet.apache.org
Subject: Re: Release
On 2017-04-26, Shad Storhaug wrote
1 - 100 of 735 matches
Mail list logo
