Us marketing guys like to use major versions to also refer to big leaps in
new use cases and market segments that couldn't effectively be served
before.
One could argue that SVM might be in that category.
However, if you do some kind of major refactoring of architecture that
doesn't necessarily r
On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 3:46 PM, Frank McQuillan wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I would like to suggest that the next release of MADlib be called v1.10.
> Recently I have been referring to it as v1.9.2.
>
> However, MADlib follows 3-digit semantic versioning MAJOR.MINOR.PATCH
> http://semver.org/
> where:
>
