Re: Backlog - Reordered Top->Down

[Andrew Palumbo]

+1 thank you



From: Trevor Grant <trevor.d.gr...@gmail.com>
Sent: Tuesday, March 6, 2018 2:13:14 PM
To: Mahout Dev List
Subject: Re: Backlog - Reordered Top->Down

Sorry- forgot to respond when i saw this- yes thanks!!



On Tue, Mar 6, 2018 at 12:51 PM, Dmitriy Lyubimov <dlie...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Thank you.
>
> On Sat, Mar 3, 2018 at 1:45 PM, André Santi Oliveira <asobra...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Things which were in the backlog were organized (top->down) using
> criteria:
> >
> >   - Fix Version(s)
> >   - Priority
> >   - Type
> >
> >
> > If you don't agree with the order of some things which are there, feel
> free
> > to move around but I would like to understand the why to myself be able
> to
> > organize better next time. We have a lot of things "not tagged" which I
> put
> > on the bottom of the backlog, but it does not means are less important.
> > just means I was not able to classify still.
> >
> > I still need to understand how do you classify things in terms of
> versions.
> > In my head I have the workflow which is things are being done then we tag
> > to say "it will be delivered in this version for sure", but it's just a
> > detail for now as I said I'm still understanding the whole process and
> how
> > do you work.
> >
> >
> > Cheers,
> > André
> >
>

Re: Backlog - Reordered Top->Down

[Trevor Grant]

Sorry- forgot to respond when i saw this- yes thanks!!



On Tue, Mar 6, 2018 at 12:51 PM, Dmitriy Lyubimov  wrote:

> Thank you.
>
> On Sat, Mar 3, 2018 at 1:45 PM, André Santi Oliveira 
> wrote:
>
> > Things which were in the backlog were organized (top->down) using
> criteria:
> >
> >   - Fix Version(s)
> >   - Priority
> >   - Type
> >
> >
> > If you don't agree with the order of some things which are there, feel
> free
> > to move around but I would like to understand the why to myself be able
> to
> > organize better next time. We have a lot of things "not tagged" which I
> put
> > on the bottom of the backlog, but it does not means are less important.
> > just means I was not able to classify still.
> >
> > I still need to understand how do you classify things in terms of
> versions.
> > In my head I have the workflow which is things are being done then we tag
> > to say "it will be delivered in this version for sure", but it's just a
> > detail for now as I said I'm still understanding the whole process and
> how
> > do you work.
> >
> >
> > Cheers,
> > André
> >
>

Re: Backlog - Reordered Top->Down

[Dmitriy Lyubimov]

Thank you.

On Sat, Mar 3, 2018 at 1:45 PM, André Santi Oliveira 
wrote:

> Things which were in the backlog were organized (top->down) using criteria:
>
>   - Fix Version(s)
>   - Priority
>   - Type
>
>
> If you don't agree with the order of some things which are there, feel free
> to move around but I would like to understand the why to myself be able to
> organize better next time. We have a lot of things "not tagged" which I put
> on the bottom of the backlog, but it does not means are less important.
> just means I was not able to classify still.
>
> I still need to understand how do you classify things in terms of versions.
> In my head I have the workflow which is things are being done then we tag
> to say "it will be delivered in this version for sure", but it's just a
> detail for now as I said I'm still understanding the whole process and how
> do you work.
>
>
> Cheers,
> André
>