GitHub user britter opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/123
Add test for setting environment variables from surefire configuratioâ¦
â¦n for JUnit 5
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull
Github user britter commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/123
@Tibor17 finally found some time to work on more ITs :-)
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
GitHub user britter opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/125
Consistently rename JUnit 4.x integration tests
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/britter/maven-surefire
GitHub user britter opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/124
Fix formatting, convert tabs to spaces
Just some minor cosmetic changes...
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull
Hi,
now that we have a separate branch for the JUnit 5 support in the surefire
repo, I'm asking myself how to much things forward. I've added some
additional IT implementations in my GitHub fork, but they all fail because
the 5.0.0-M2 release of junit-surefire-provider does not implement the
Github user Tibor17 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/maven-surefire/pull/125#discussion_r81666066
--- Diff:
surefire-integration-tests/src/test/java/org/apache/maven/surefire/its/JUnit47ConcurrencyIT.java
---
@@ -32,14 +32,14 @@
*
*
+1 to adopt JUnit 5 provider to Maven Surefire git branch.
You would have to extend AbstractSurefireMojo.java with JUnit 5 provider in
classpath builder.
Do we have to keep using other license?
Can we ask the JUnit team to continuously migrate stable changes to
Surefire?
On Mon, Oct 3, 2016 at
Can you simplify and speed up writing integration tests in the way that you
would parameterize the existing JUnit 4 testing by adding Maven profiles
(one default profile and junit5 profile) having another dependencies and
@RunWith(Parameterized.class)?
This would be cool because we can have
Hi,
sorry for the late reply... :-)
Stephen Connolly schrieb am Mo., 26. Sep.
2016 um 12:03 Uhr:
> Well another question is how much longer will we support Java 7 anyway...
> what we have said in the past is the next release line after JDK9 is
> released will