Hi,
+1 from me.
tested via this:
./release-checker.sh
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/maven-1394/org/apache/maven/shared/maven-shared-utils/3.2.1/maven-shared-utils-3.2.1-source-release.zip
Removing existing release test area...done.
Downloading release package
On 9 February 2018 at 21:57, Enrico Olivelli wrote:
> Il ven 9 feb 2018, 02:13 Olivier Lamy ha scritto:
>
> > On 8 February 2018 at 07:00, Hervé BOUTEMY
> wrote:
> >
> > > Le jeudi 8 février 2018, 06:45:24 CET Olivier Lamy a écrit :
Il ven 9 feb 2018, 02:13 Olivier Lamy ha scritto:
> On 8 February 2018 at 07:00, Hervé BOUTEMY wrote:
>
> > Le jeudi 8 février 2018, 06:45:24 CET Olivier Lamy a écrit :
> > > Hi,
> > > I'm looking now at having surefire/failsafe working with jdk10 (yup
>
Policy: snaphots from master branches (and possibly long lived maintenance
branches) are deployed automatically.
Build setup: downstream projects must be build after a master build and
deploy.
On 9 February 2018 at 13:03, Stephen Connolly <
stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Write down
Document what you think the policy should be and we'll go from there.
My (current) preferred policy is:
There is no automatic deployment of snapshots. Developers can manually
publish snapshots on an as needed basis and if they require downstream
builds to pick those up then they need to
+1
On Tue, 06 Feb 2018 23:11:40 +0100, Robert Scholte
wrote:
Hi,
We solved 2 issues:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12317922=12340978=Text
There are still a couple of issues left in JIRA:
On 9 February 2018 at 12:01, Stephen Connolly <
stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Document what you think the policy should be and we'll go from there.
>
> My (current) preferred policy is:
>
> There is no automatic deployment of snapshots. Developers can manually
> publish snapshots
Perso I don't want anything else than master deployed..
wip feature branch doesn't make really sense to be deployed.
and makes our life easier :-)
On 9 February 2018 at 07:40, Stephen Connolly <
stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I personally think there are a lot of issues with CI
Write down the policy you would like
On 9 February 2018 at 12:25, Olivier Lamy wrote:
> On 9 February 2018 at 12:01, Stephen Connolly <
> stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Document what you think the policy should be and we'll go from there.
> >
> > My (current)