Re: Important Notice for all users of the parallel build feature

Is it possible to include this jar to maven distribution? Because it is not always possible to change it on build servers . On 19 October 2014 01:22, Kristian Rosenvold kristian.rosenv...@gmail.com wrote: Thanks to an excellent testcase provided by a JIRA user, a significant source of

Re: [VOTE] Change project logo and adopt owl as mascot

+1 WBR, Maxim (from mobile, sorry for the typos) On Nov 25, 2014 5:31 PM, domi d...@fortysix.ch wrote: +1 On 25.11.2014, at 11:57, Stephen Connolly stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com wrote: - To unsubscribe, e-mail:

Re: [ANN] Apache Maven SCM Version 1.9.4 Released

yfv ,jhtw yt ye;ty On Thu, Apr 2, 2015 at 12:39 PM, Karl Heinz Marbaise khmarba...@apache.org wrote: The Apache Maven team is pleased to announce the release of the Apache Maven SCM, version 1.9.4 Maven SCM supports Maven 2.x plugins (e.g. maven-release-plugin) and other tools (e.g.

Re: [ANN] Apache Maven SCM Version 1.9.4 Released

sorry for crappy message :( On Thu, Apr 2, 2015 at 12:55 PM, Maxim Solodovnik solomax...@gmail.com wrote: yfv ,jhtw yt ye;ty On Thu, Apr 2, 2015 at 12:39 PM, Karl Heinz Marbaise khmarba...@apache.org wrote: The Apache Maven team is pleased to announce the release of the Apache Maven SCM

Re: Java 7 and 8 features

We are just moved to java7 and start using new features I personally don't like the idea of moving all code to new java, I move the areas I currently work on On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 10:57 PM, Gary Gregory wrote: > Hi, > > What I see, is that most projects are struggling

Re: Maven plugin for code signing @Apache

g a plugin for general public use. > > What do you expect from this signing feature for jars? > > Regards, > > Hervé > > [1] http://maven.apache.org/plugins/maven-gpg-plugin/ > > Le jeudi 8 octobre 2015 12:26:57 Maxim Solodovnik a écrit : > > Hello Al

Re: Maven plugin for code signing @Apache

Guide.html On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 4:58 PM, Tibor Digana <tibor.dig...@googlemail.com> wrote: > As I am reading your discussion, I am a little bit scared. > Maxim you use your own ASK key? > > On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 8:02 AM, Maxim Solodovnik <solomax...@gmail.com> > wrote: &g

Maven plugin for code signing @Apache

Hello All, More than a year ago INFRA announce availability of code signing at Apache: https://blogs.apache.org/infra/entry/code_signing_service_now_available but still there is no maven plugin for doing that :( I never wrote maven plugins and need more time to write "Hello world" level plugins

Re: Maven plugin for code signing @Apache

> > Gruss > Bernd > -- > http://bernd.eckenfels.net > > -Original Message- > From: Maxim Solodovnik <solomax...@gmail.com> > To: Maven Developers List <dev@maven.apache.org> > Sent: Do., 08 Okt. 2015 8:26 > Subject: Maven plugin for code signing @Apache > >

Re: Maven plugin for code signing @Apache

ture inside jar file which can be > accomplished by maven-jarsigner-plugin > https://maven.apache.org/plugins/maven-jarsigner-plugin/usage.html > You could open discussion in Users group. > > On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 1:14 PM, Maxim Solodovnik [via Maven] < > ml-node+s40175n584969

Re: [ANN] Apache Maven Version 3.3.9 Released

it seems not all mirrors are ready for the update :( this one http://apache-mirror.rbc.ru/pub/apache/maven/maven-3/3.3.9/binaries/apache-maven-3.3.9-bin.tar.gz gaves 404 On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 1:26 PM, Tony Chemit wrote: > On Wed, 18 Nov 2015 07:11:17 + (UTC) >

Re: [ANN] Apache Maven Version 3.3.9 Released

Everything works as expected now :) On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 11:16 PM, Karl Heinz Marbaise <khmarba...@gmx.de> wrote: > Hi, > > On 11/18/15 10:12 AM, Maxim Solodovnik wrote: > >> it seems not all mirrors are ready for the update :( >> this one >> >> ht

Re: Apache OpenMeetings build fails on Maven 3.4-SNAPSHOT

I'll keep this email and will double-check everything after 3.4 will be released On Mon, Sep 5, 2016 at 10:25 PM, Christian Schulte <c...@schulte.it> wrote: > Am 09/05/16 um 16:48 schrieb Maxim Solodovnik: > > I have merged your PR, Thanks! :)) > > I cannot tell in what ver

Re: Apache OpenMeetings build fails on Maven 3.4-SNAPSHOT

t; Thanks, Christian. Is there a Maven ticket for this? > > On Mon, Sep 5, 2016 at 5:30 PM, Maxim Solodovnik <solomax...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > I'll keep this email and will double-check everything after 3.4 will be > > released > > > > On Mon, Sep 5, 2

Re: Apache OpenMeetings build fails on Maven 3.4-SNAPSHOT

I have merged your PR, Thanks! :)) On Mon, Sep 5, 2016 at 9:24 PM, Christian Schulte wrote: > > > Am 09/05/16 um 14:39 schrieb Behrooz Nobakht: > > Hi there, > > > > Trying to build Apache OpenMeetings with Apache Maven

Re: Maven Site / Report Plugins

Hello Karl, I guess you can "skip" report for subproject? On Mon, Mar 20, 2017 at 1:48 PM, Karl Heinz Marbaise wrote: > Hi Hervé, > > On 19/03/17 23:39, Hervé BOUTEMY wrote: >> >> That's the first time I see this part of the doc: defining an empty >> reportSet >> could remove

Re: Maven Site / Report Plugins

then maybe copy/paste a little: configure all necessary reports in parent pom (exclude github-report) Then add github-report to all child projects except one On Mon, Mar 20, 2017 at 2:19 PM, Karl Heinz Marbaise <khmarba...@gmx.de> wrote: > Hi, > > > On 20/03/17 07:54, Maxi

Re: Access Rights

Maybe you can provide PR (no additional rights are required in this case)? On Fri, May 25, 2018 at 4:57 PM, Petar Tahchiev wrote: > Hi guys, > > I just noted the maven archetype repository is now on github: > > https://github.com/apache/maven-archetype > > I was working on

Re: Maven Docker Images

Hello, here is the place for Apache docker images managed by infra and Apache projects https://bintray.com/apache/ :) On Fri, Oct 20, 2017 at 12:30 AM, Hervé BOUTEMY wrote: > great idea > > ok, we need a git repo at ASF > > what else? > Is there some sort of release

Re: Maven Docker Images

In this case dockerhub is preferable :) On Fri, Oct 20, 2017 at 11:07 AM, Bindul Bhowmik <bindulbhow...@gmail.com> wrote: > Maxim, > > On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 7:54 PM, Maxim Solodovnik <solomax...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > Hello, > > > > he

Re: Maven Docker Images

ated to publishing to Dockerhub > > Regards, > > Hervé > > Le vendredi 20 octobre 2017, 11:39:22 CEST Maxim Solodovnik a écrit : > > In this case dockerhub is preferable :) > > > > On Fri, Oct 20, 2017 at 11:07 AM, Bindul Bhowmik < > bindulbhow...@gmail.com> &g

Re: Maven Project Info Reports Plugin 3.0.1 release

+1 :) Will be happy to help with this release :) BTW can someone take a look at this https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MPIR-374 issue? Or maybe any pointer on where to look? I spent some time trying to fix it, but no luck :( On Tue, 18 Jun 2019 at 00:31, Peter Somogyi wrote: > Hi, > > I'd

Re: Maven Project Info Reports Plugin 3.0.1 release

verify -Prun-its -Dinvoker.test=MPIR-374* > It should fail because the build.log contains the error message. > > I hope this is enough information to continue and hopefully fix this issue. > > thanks > Robert > > > On 18-6-2019 04:29:06, Maxim Solodovnik wrote: > +1

Re: [RESULT][DISCUSS] Make Jira issues viewable.

The filter is private actually On Fri, 11 Sep 2020 at 17:50, Arnaud Héritier wrote: > It's not a blocker if it works without the filter parameter but the > behavior is strange (I never saw this myself) > > On Fri, Sep 11, 2020 at 12:25 PM Robert Scholte > wrote: > > > Clear, it is not an

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven version 3.8.0

Hello, Moving might not do what is expected the binaries are already in http://archive.apache.org/dist/maven/maven-3/3.8.0/ On Fri, 26 Mar 2021 at 11:25, Olivier Lamy wrote: > > Yes you're right that shouldn't be there as this has been mirrored in all > Apache mirrors as a real release... > >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven version 3.8.0

g release number either, as the failure stays in > the dev community, so I don't think the larger user audience cares about > those... > > > > Le ven. 26 mars 2021 à 08:17, Maxim Solodovnik a > écrit : > > > Hello, > > > > Moving might not do what is expected

Re: [ANN] Maven Checkstyle Plugin 3.2.2 released

Hello, For whatever reason both 3.2.1 and 3.2.2 are released with 9.3 While latest version ATM 10.9.3 Why to release with outdated dependency? from mobile (sorry for typos ;) On Fri, Apr 21, 2023, 02:04 Michael Osipov wrote: > The Apache Maven team is pleased to announce the release of

Re: [VOTE] Change to the voting process

Hello Tamás, The ASF rule "vote open for at least 72h" only limits lower bound i.e. the VOTE can't be closed earlier than 72 hours are over but can last longer :)) On Fri, 12 May 2023 at 16:33, Tamás Cservenák wrote: > > Howdy, > > I'd like to propose a change to the ASF Maven voting process

Re: [VOTE] Change to the voting process

l releases will MUST wait for 30 days :( So you can't do quick release ... > > Thanks > T > > On Fri, May 12, 2023 at 11:37 AM Maxim Solodovnik > wrote: > > > Hello Tamás, > > > > The ASF rule "vote open for at least 72h" only limits lower bound > &g

Re: [VOTE] Change to the voting process

o make "fast" release :) > > T > > On Fri, May 12, 2023 at 11:58 AM Maxim Solodovnik > wrote: > > > from mobile (sorry for typos ;) > > > > > > On Fri, May 12, 2023, 16:53 Tamás Cservenák wrote: > > > > > Howdy Romain, > > &g

Re: [VOTE] Change to the voting process

from mobile (sorry for typos ;) On Fri, May 12, 2023, 16:53 Tamás Cservenák wrote: > Howdy Romain, > > So here is a catch: this is a completely valid vote started by a member of > PMC. > The reason for it is exactly to shake up things a bit. > Otherwise, if nobody votes, this vote according to

Re: [ANN] Maven Checkstyle Plugin 3.2.2 released

ping? :) On Fri, 21 Apr 2023 at 08:39, Maxim Solodovnik wrote: > > Hello, > > For whatever reason both 3.2.1 and 3.2.2 are released with > > 9.3 > > While latest version ATM 10.9.3 > > Why to release with outdated dependency? > > from mobile (sorry for typos

Re: [ANN] Maven Checkstyle Plugin 3.2.2 released

On Fri, 5 May 2023 at 11:34, Mark Derricutt wrote: > > On 5 May 2023, at 16:21, Maxim Solodovnik wrote: > > While latest version ATM 10.9.3 > > Checkstyle 10.x requires Java 9+ which is good enough reason in my mind to > not update it officially (yet). Understood, thanks