Re: [VOTE] Apache Maven 3.0.4 (take 2)

2011-12-02 Thread Mirko Friedenhagen
+1 (non-binding) used it on a couple of builds without problems. Regards Mirko -- Sent from my phone http://illegalstateexception.blogspot.com http://github.com/mfriedenhagen/ https://bitbucket.org/mfriedenhagen/ On Dec 3, 2011 2:33 AM, Emmanuel Venisse emmanuel.veni...@gmail.com wrote: +1

Re: RC release naming (was Re: [VOTE] Apache Maven 3.0.4 (take 2) )

2011-12-05 Thread Mirko Friedenhagen
Hello everybody, I understand the need to distinguish between these attempts. I now have a local copy of 3.0.4 on my disc (as well as on some others). Next month forgetful as I am, I will not know anymore which of the different 3.0.4 copies was the blessed one. Let alone that the tag in

Re: RC release naming (was Re: [VOTE] Apache Maven 3.0.4 (take 2) )

2011-12-05 Thread Mirko Friedenhagen
for some reason. On 5 December 2011 13:46, Mirko Friedenhagen mfriedenha...@gmail.com wrote: Hello everybody, I understand the need to distinguish between these attempts. I now have a local copy of 3.0.4 on my disc (as well as on some others). Next month forgetful as I am, I

Re: [CALL FOR TEST] Apache Maven 3.0.4-RC3 staged

2011-12-05 Thread Mirko Friedenhagen
Tested on a couple of builds with mostly standard plugins, looks good. Regards Mirko -- Sent from my phone http://illegalstateexception.blogspot.com http://github.com/mfriedenhagen/ https://bitbucket.org/mfriedenhagen/ On Dec 5, 2011 3:28 PM, Olivier Lamy ol...@apache.org wrote: Hello,

Preferred language for verify scripts in integration tests of plugins

2011-12-07 Thread Mirko Friedenhagen
Hello, I see, that mojo regularly uses groovy scripts for the verifiy step in integration tests of plugins. However maven plugins seem to use bsh, which is a pain compared to groovy. Are maven-plugins not allowed to use groovy for these tests? Regards Mirko --

Re: How to get nice doc for a bean-ie sort of Mojo parameter

2011-12-12 Thread Mirko Friedenhagen
+2048 ;-) Regards Mirko -- Sent from my phone http://illegalstateexception.blogspot.com http://github.com/mfriedenhagen/ https://bitbucket.org/mfriedenhagen/ On Dec 12, 2011 3:49 AM, Jesse Farinacci jie...@gmail.com wrote: On Sun, Dec 11, 2011 at 9:47 PM, Benson Margulies bimargul...@gmail.com

Re: maven-release-plugin: using git where do I see the tag used to build the release in the pom?

2011-12-19 Thread Mirko Friedenhagen
As discussed on the user-list: On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 22:58, Mirko Friedenhagen mfriedenha...@gmail.com wrote: Hello, I know that with SVN the developerConnection and connection are updated to the real URL, that is when I invoke release:prepare with a URL

Re: maven-release-plugin: using git where do I see the tag used to build the release in the pom?

2011-12-19 Thread Mirko Friedenhagen
providers have something implemented. for git it's : git rev-parse --verify HEAD for svn: svn info for hg: hg id more details on those providers in various Info command impls. 2011/12/19 Stephen Connolly stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com: On 19 December 2011 10:45, Mirko Friedenhagen mfriedenha

Re: maven-release-plugin: using git where do I see the tag used to build the release in the pom?

2011-12-20 Thread Mirko Friedenhagen
, Stephen Connolly stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com wrote: Then it will have to be the tag name so... On 19 December 2011 21:28, Mirko Friedenhagen mfriedenha...@gmail.com wrote: Hm, this will be a hard one. I know detected, that the rewrite of the SCM section happens in the maven-release-plugin

Re: [CALL FOR TEST] Apache Maven 3.0.4-RC4 staged

2011-12-24 Thread Mirko Friedenhagen
FYI - runs fine on my Jenkins instance and my Mac. Regards Mirko On Fri, Dec 23, 2011 at 19:58, Jesse Glick jesse.gl...@oracle.com wrote: FYI - again integrated into NetBeans development builds to spur testing. - To

Re: [CALL FOR TEST] Apache Maven 3.0.4-RC5 staged

2012-01-10 Thread Mirko Friedenhagen
Works fine here. Regards Mirko On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 01:21, Stephen Connolly stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com wrote: None here On 9 January 2012 23:44, Brett Porter br...@apache.org wrote: No issues here. On 06/01/2012, at 7:52 AM, Olivier Lamy wrote: Hello, Apache Maven 3.0.4-RC5 has

Re: [PROPOSAL] Reporting plugins should require Maven 2.2.1

2012-01-14 Thread Mirko Friedenhagen
+1 Now that Java 1.5 has already seen EOL for some years it is funny that most plugins even are still working with 1.4. Regards Mirko -- Sent from my phone http://illegalstateexception.blogspot.com http://github.com/mfriedenhagen/ https://bitbucket.org/mfriedenhagen/ On Jan 12, 2012 12:22 AM,

Re: [VOTE] Apache Maven 3.0.4

2012-01-17 Thread Mirko Friedenhagen
+1 non-binding, I ran a few jenkins jobs without problem (Linux) and some local jobs on Mac OS X Lion. Regards Mirko On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 11:14, Olivier Lamy ol...@apache.org wrote: Hello, After some RCs, it's now time to cut the release. So I start the vote for Apache Maven 3.0.4. The

enforcer: Differentiate between INFO, WARNING and ERROR per rule

2012-03-07 Thread Mirko Friedenhagen
Hello, http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MENFORCER-124 suggests a Rule-scoped fail property as feature. My suggestion would be something like this: - Add an optional qualifier per rule which differentiates between INFO, WARNING and ERROR (same as the loglevels) and - Make the rules log with this

Re: enforcer: Differentiate between INFO, WARNING and ERROR per rule

2012-03-13 Thread Mirko Friedenhagen
No thoughts about this? Should I just create a new ticket for this :-)? Regards Mirko On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 21:16, Mirko Friedenhagen mfriedenha...@gmail.com wrote: Hello, http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MENFORCER-124 suggests a Rule-scoped fail property as feature. My suggestion would

Re: enforcer: Differentiate between INFO, WARNING and ERROR per rule

2012-03-14 Thread Mirko Friedenhagen
Friedenhagen mfriedenha...@gmail.com: No thoughts about this? Should I just create a new ticket for this :-)? Regards Mirko On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 21:16, Mirko Friedenhagen mfriedenha...@gmail.com wrote: Hello, http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MENFORCER-124 suggests a Rule-scoped fail property

Re: How to get the original pom which defines the rule configuration in a child?

2012-03-29 Thread Mirko Friedenhagen
contains project coords On Wednesday, 28 March 2012, Mirko Friedenhagen mfriedenha...@gmail.com wrote: Hello, I have written a extra enforcer rule (requitePropertyDiverges), which shall make sure, that properties are overwritten in a child pom. The usecase is as follows: - company super pom

Re: Version scheme question

2012-04-16 Thread Mirko Friedenhagen
Or you could try something total different like providing a stable API of your library while providing two adapters for Vadin6 and Vadin7, so you have myvadin-api - myvadin6-impl - myvadin7-impl and let the user of your library choose during runtime whether they want to use vadin 6 or 7. This

Re: [VOTE] Release Maven Release Plugin version 2.3

2012-05-08 Thread Mirko Friedenhagen
Hello Robert, +1 (non-binding) for the plugin I tested release:prepate with one of my pet projects and http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MRELEASE-723 seems to work (at least for GIT :-)) and another project using subversion seems to work as well (i.e. does not change the 2.2.2 behavior). -1

Re: [VOTE] Release Maven Enforcer version 1.1

2012-05-09 Thread Mirko Friedenhagen
+1 (non-binding) tested with two pat projects and mojo's extra-enforcer-rules trunk (all ITs ran successfully). Regards Mirko On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 5:46 AM, Paul Gier pg...@redhat.com wrote: Hi, We solved 5 issues:

Re: Maven plugin in ant/beanshell

2012-05-13 Thread Mirko Friedenhagen
Hello Olivier, where I work we have two plugins written in Ant. Regards Mirko -- Sent from my phone http://illegalstateexception.blogspot.com http://github.com/mfriedenhagen/ https://bitbucket.org/mfriedenhagen/ On May 12, 2012 11:36 PM, Olivier Lamy ol...@apache.org wrote: Hi, Do we still

Re: Maven Plugins annotations support @Component role attribute to Class?

2012-05-20 Thread Mirko Friedenhagen
Hello Olivier, hopefully the role and the type of the member are not always redundant :-): --- snip --- @Component( role = ArtifactMetadataSource.class, roleHint = maven ) protected ArtifactMetadataSource artifactMetadataSource; --- snap --- Regards Mirko On Sun, May 20, 2012 at 10:56 AM,

Re: [VOTE] Release Maven Fluido skin 1.2.2

2012-07-08 Thread Mirko Friedenhagen
+1 (non-binding) tested on one multi-module project. Is it on purpose that the entries in the side bar are on two lines now for entries with two words? Regards Mirko - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org

Re: Snark on the users list

2012-07-23 Thread Mirko Friedenhagen
Hello Benson, looking at http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/maven/site/trunk/src/site/apt/guides/getting-started/maven-in-five-minutes.apt?r1=1243212r2=1364633pathrev=1364633diff_format=h Maybe you could point out that Maven users (or developers in general :-)) are better off installing the JDK.

Re: [VOTE] Maven Skins parent 7 and Maven Fluido skin 1.3.0

2012-08-27 Thread Mirko Friedenhagen
+1 (non-binding). Tested this with one of my multi-module projects, looks good. Regards Mirko On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 3:13 PM, Olivier Lamy ol...@apache.org wrote: Hi, We solved 10 issues: http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=11430styleName=Htmlversion=18713 Staging

Re: [VOTE] Release Maven Surefire version 2.12.3

2012-08-27 Thread Mirko Friedenhagen
+1 (non-binding) Regards Mirko On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 6:57 PM, Hervé BOUTEMY herve.bout...@free.fr wrote: +1 Hervé Le samedi 25 août 2012 00:11:55 Kristian Rosenvold a écrit : Hi, We solved 11 issues: https://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10541version=18 704

Re: [VOTE] Release Maven Project Info Reports Plugin version 2.5.1

2012-08-27 Thread Mirko Friedenhagen
+1 (non-binding) tested on one multi-module project. Regards Mirko On Sun, Aug 26, 2012 at 10:11 PM, Hervé BOUTEMY herve.bout...@free.fr wrote: Hi, We solved 5 issues: http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=11142version=18715styleName=Html There are still a couple of

Release date for maven-checkstyle-plugin 2.10?

2012-09-19 Thread Mirko Friedenhagen
Hello, is there a plan to release 2.10 anytime soon? Regards Mirko -- http://illegalstateexception.blogspot.com/ https://github.com/mfriedenhagen/ https://bitbucket.org/mfriedenhagen/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail:

Re: [VOTE] Release Maven Surefire version 2.12.4

2012-09-24 Thread Mirko Friedenhagen
+1 (non-binding) I tested this release using JDK 1.6.0_32-b05-420 as well as jdk1.7.0_07 with a small multi-module project, surefire as well as building the site including a cobertura report look good. Regards Mirko On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 8:30 PM, Kristian Rosenvold

Re: Release of maven-enforcer-plugin 1.2

2012-11-05 Thread Mirko Friedenhagen
Hello, I take it no one is eager to do a release, then :-). So I will prepare an in-house vendor-release :-). Regards Mirko On Sun, Oct 28, 2012 at 8:42 PM, Mirko Friedenhagen mfriedenha...@gmail.com wrote: Hello, I just wanted to know whether a release of 1.2 is planned anytime soon

Re: Logger name for mojo

2012-11-15 Thread Mirko Friedenhagen
Hello, not a Maven-developer, but here are my thoughts: I think Jason's solution using package.class conventions is more standard. When someone asks for help, telling them to call (assuming -L would be the option to set the loggers): mvn -L

Re: [VOTE] Maven Compiler Plugin 3.0 and maven-shared-incremental 1.0

2012-11-16 Thread Mirko Friedenhagen
+1 (non-binding) tested with two single and one multi-module project. Regards Mirko On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 7:15 PM, Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de wrote: +1 LieGrue, strub - Original Message - From: Stephane Nicoll stephane.nic...@gmail.com To: Maven Developers List

Re: [VOTE] Release Maven Invoker Plugin version 1.8

2012-11-24 Thread Mirko Friedenhagen
+1 (non-binding) tested with two personal projects and the trunk of the extra-enforcer-rules from codehaus. Regards Mirko On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 7:04 PM, Robert Scholte rfscho...@apache.org wrote: Hi, We solved 14 issues:

Re: To RC or not RC

2012-11-25 Thread Mirko Friedenhagen
Hello, I would support Stephen's suggestion and go with a quick 3.1.0 and liked it better to fix-forward and release a 3.1.1 quite soon afterwards. In the end you will get more feedback from a release then from a RC. Regards Mirko On Sun, Nov 25, 2012 at 8:50 PM, Stephen Connolly

Re: [VOTE] Release Maven Enforcer version 1.2

2012-12-01 Thread Mirko Friedenhagen
+1 (non-binding), tested with two projects. Regards Mirko On Sat, Dec 1, 2012 at 11:37 AM, Robert Scholte rfscho...@apache.org wrote: +1 Op Thu, 29 Nov 2012 22:18:35 +0100 schreef Tony Chemit che...@codelutin.com: On Wed, 28 Nov 2012 18:26:13 -0600 Paul Gier pg...@apache.org wrote: +1

Re: git experts: please help

2012-12-02 Thread Mirko Friedenhagen
Hello, you could use git notes http://git-scm.com/2010/08/25/notes.html for this. Regards Mirko -- Sent from my mobile On Dec 2, 2012 9:42 AM, Kristian Rosenvold kristian.rosenv...@gmail.com wrote: You can't. Once a commit has been pushed there's no change that can be done. In practice, if

Re: git experts: please help

2012-12-02 Thread Mirko Friedenhagen
through my IDE which doesn't tell anything about notes) Regards, Hervé Le dimanche 2 décembre 2012 09:53:24 Mirko Friedenhagen a écrit : Hello, you could use git notes http://git-scm.com/2010/08/25/notes.html for this. Regards Mirko You can't. Once a commit has been pushed

Re: [DISCUSS] the art of logging - was: [VOTE] Maven 3.1.0

2012-12-07 Thread Mirko Friedenhagen
Well, then at least a property to be set in ~/.m2/settings.xml to switch colors on would be nice :-). I for one would be much more interested in introducing a switch which allows to suppress INFO but not WARN :-). Regards Mirko On Fri, Dec 7, 2012 at 10:54 PM, Stephen Connolly

Re: [VOTE] Maven 3.1.0

2012-12-07 Thread Mirko Friedenhagen
Hello Kristian, I ran d2fc26066b3e5ceb7912b69ce360fa75a8d9a2bb of the maven-integration-testing project using the profiles and: a) did not see a big difference in runtime (mvn304 ~ 9:50, mvn310 ~10:29) b) had failing tests with 310 *and* 304. Apache Maven 3.0.4 (r1232337; 2012-01-17

Re: Wrong checksums for org/apache/maven/its/maven-core-it-support/1.0 in Maven-Central

2012-12-07 Thread Mirko Friedenhagen
Sorry for the noise, last time I reported something coming from apache.org, Central sent me back to Apache :-). Regards Mirko On Fri, Dec 7, 2012 at 11:15 PM, Anders Hammar and...@hammar.net wrote: It's been fixed. See ticket. /Anders (mobile) Den 7 dec 2012 22:46 skrev Mirko Friedenhagen

Re: [DISCUSS] the art of logging - was: [VOTE] Maven 3.1.0

2012-12-07 Thread Mirko Friedenhagen
As christmas is near I just start wishing for WARN on the console and INFO going to target/maven.TIMESTAMP.log. The biggest problem I see: most often the SUTs in surefire executions just spoil the whole console log when testing error situations because no one uses a logback-test.xml. Regards

Re: [VOTE] Release Maven Release Plugin version 2.4

2012-12-15 Thread Mirko Friedenhagen
+1 (non-binding), tested release:prepare release:perfrom with a small multi-module project. Regards Mirko On Sat, Dec 15, 2012 at 4:44 PM, Hervé BOUTEMY herve.bout...@free.fr wrote: +1 Regards, Hervé Le jeudi 13 décembre 2012 23:48:24 Robert Scholte a écrit : Hi, We solved 24 issues:

Re: [VOTE] Release Maven Release Plugin version 2.4

2012-12-15 Thread Mirko Friedenhagen
Hello Robert, I see the site at http://maven.apache.org/maven-release-archives/maven-release-2.4/ still uses the old style and not the fluido-skin, is this on purpose? Regards Mirko On Sat, Dec 15, 2012 at 8:40 PM, Mirko Friedenhagen mfriedenha...@gmail.com wrote: +1 (non-binding), tested

Re: maven-shared-utils vs. plexus-utils

2012-12-16 Thread Mirko Friedenhagen
, Kristian Rosenvold kristian.rosenv...@gmail.com wrote: Just updated the site http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/maven/shared/trunk/maven-shared-utils/src/site/apt/index.apt Will redeploy 0.2 site once I get the suntan lotion out of my hair. Kristian 2012/12/15 Mirko Friedenhagen mfriedenha

Re: maven-surefire pull request: [SUREFIRE-933] repair parallel=classes

2012-12-16 Thread Mirko Friedenhagen
Hello, looking at https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=maven-surefire.git;a=blob;f=surefire-api/src/main/java/org/apache/maven/surefire/util/LazyTestsToRun.java;h=3a6dba7116f160b46eb518e20fec3b1045684101 it seems windows line feeds crept in, is this on purpose? Regards Mirko On Sun, Dec

Re: [VOTE] Release Maven Surefire version 2.13

2012-12-21 Thread Mirko Friedenhagen
Hello Kristian, I tried this with two of my pet-projects (one is https://github.com/1and1/testlink-junit). I tried mvn-3.0.4 as well as an (unofficial) mvn-3.1.0 version. While running: mvn clean verify ran successfully, I got a problem when building the site: mvn304 -e -Dapache-pre=maven-069

Re: [VOTE] Release Maven Surefire version 2.13

2012-12-21 Thread Mirko Friedenhagen
Hello Kristian, forgot to include maven info: Apache Maven 3.0.4 (r1232337; 2012-01-17 09:44:56+0100) Maven home: /usr/local/Cellar/maven/3.0.4/libexec Java version: 1.7.0_10, vendor: Oracle Corporation Java home: /Library/Java/JavaVirtualMachines/jdk1.7.0_10.jdk/Contents/Home/jre Default

Re: [VOTE] Release Maven Surefire version 2.13

2012-12-21 Thread Mirko Friedenhagen
I put the complete log into a gist: https://gist.github.com/4355893 Regards Mirko - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Release Maven Surefire version 2.13

2012-12-21 Thread Mirko Friedenhagen
Adding -DskipITs=true let's the build succeed. Regards Mirko - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org

Re: [CANCELLED] [VOTE] Release Maven Surefire version 2.13

2012-12-22 Thread Mirko Friedenhagen
Hello Kristian, 2.14-SNAPSHOT does work for me. Strangely in my local copy of https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/maven-surefire.git the tag surefire-2.13 still sits on the previous position (72dfaa7a230cc29e94e4fdac11b6de08cc1887be). In the web interface it is moved to your latest run of

Re: [CANCELLED] [VOTE] Release Maven Surefire version 2.13

2012-12-22 Thread Mirko Friedenhagen
Hm, I had to call git fetch --tags to see the moved tag. Regards Mirko - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Release Maven Surefire version 2.13, Take 2

2012-12-23 Thread Mirko Friedenhagen
+1 (non-binding) tested with two projects (mvn clean verify site site:stage) Regards Mirko - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org

Re: Possible Regression in maven-compiler-plugin:3.0?

2013-01-21 Thread Mirko Friedenhagen
Hello Chris, I would desire such a change even if it was unplanned ;-). Regards Mirko On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 11:54 PM, Chris Graham chrisgw...@gmail.com wrote: Which is a change in behaviour. The question is: Is this a desired change ? -Chris On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 12:03 AM, Anders

Re: settings or pom - where should repositories be defined?

2013-01-24 Thread Mirko Friedenhagen
://www.sonatype.com/people/2009/02/why-putting-repositories-in-your-poms-is-a-bad-idea/ On Jan 23, 2013, at 4:08 AM, Mirko Friedenhagen mfriedenha...@gmail.com wrote: Hello, in a lot of threads on the dev and user list, I have read that thou shalt not define repositories in your pom is the way to go. However

Re: [VOTE] Maven Pmd Plugin 3.0 (take 2)

2013-02-07 Thread Mirko Friedenhagen
+1 (non-binding) tested with two multi-module projects (no new features tested and I had no violations before anyway :-)). Regards Mirko On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 11:00 AM, Olivier Lamy ol...@apache.org wrote: Hi, I'd like to release Maven Pmd Plugin 3.0. Note this version is based on PMD 5.0.2

Re: EOL of 1.5 as minimum

2013-02-07 Thread Mirko Friedenhagen
Hello, I agree with Nigel here, those who need to use an outdated version of the JDK now have to use an outdated version of Maven as well. Testing stuff with different JDK versions is work as well. Stephen, I for one would love at least 1.6 for one single reason: having @Override at interfaces

Re: [VOTE] Maven Pmd Plugin 3.0 (take 2)

2013-02-08 Thread Mirko Friedenhagen
on a large multi module project. New violations introduced (presumably as the PMD default config has moved on). Not checked the report syntax is still the same (aka works in Jenkins) -Original Message- From: Mirko Friedenhagen [mailto:mfriedenha...@gmail.com] Sent: 07 February 2013

Re: [VOTE] Maven Pmd Plugin 3.0 (take 2)

2013-02-12 Thread Mirko Friedenhagen
+1 (non-binding) Regards Mirko -- Sent from my mobile On Feb 11, 2013 6:33 PM, Olivier Lamy ol...@apache.org wrote: +1 2013/2/7 Olivier Lamy ol...@apache.org: Hi, I'd like to release Maven Pmd Plugin 3.0. Note this version is based on PMD 5.0.2 (reason for the version bump). We fixed

Re: [VOTE] Maven Pmd Plugin 3.0 (take 2)

2013-02-12 Thread Mirko Friedenhagen
Btw: big thanks, Olivier, for fixing the documentation that quickly :). Regards Mirko -- Sent from my mobile On Feb 11, 2013 6:33 PM, Olivier Lamy ol...@apache.org wrote: +1 2013/2/7 Olivier Lamy ol...@apache.org: Hi, I'd like to release Maven Pmd Plugin 3.0. Note this version is based

Re: [VOTE] Maven Pmd Plugin 3.0 (take 2)

2013-02-14 Thread Mirko Friedenhagen
Aah, and I was already wondering wether down-under 72h meant something different :-). Regards Mirko -- Sent from my mobile On Feb 15, 2013 12:40 AM, Olivier Lamy ol...@apache.org wrote: ping. one binding +1 is still missing. Thanks 2013/2/11 Olivier Lamy ol...@apache.org: +1 2013/2/7

Re: [VOTE] Release Maven Checkstyle Plugin version 2.10

2013-02-17 Thread Mirko Friedenhagen
+1 (non-binding) (tested with two simple multi-module projects, however I already disabled the aggregation report because of the doubled entries). Regards Mirko On Sun, Feb 17, 2013 at 3:48 PM, Dennis Lundberg denn...@apache.org wrote: Hi, We solved N issues:

Re: [VOTE] Apache Maven 3.0.5

2013-02-20 Thread Mirko Friedenhagen
+1 (non-binding) - rebuilt all 33 projects in a Jenkins instance (without deploy but with cleaned local maven cache), successfully deployed two projects from my workstation to oss-snapshots. Regards Mirko -- http://illegalstateexception.blogspot.com/ https://github.com/mfriedenhagen/

Re: [ANN] Apache Maven 3.0.5 released

2013-02-23 Thread Mirko Friedenhagen
Hello Olivier, Looking at: http://maven.apache.org/plugins/maven-javadoc-plugin/javadoc-mojo.html lifecylce phase in Invokes the execution of the lifecycle phase generate-sources prior to executing itself. links to http://maven.apache.org/ref/current/maven-core/lifecycles.html which redirects

Re: [VOTE] formally end support for Maven 1

2013-03-02 Thread Mirko Friedenhagen
+1 non-binding Regards Mirko -- Sent from my mobile

Re: [VOTE] Release Maven Changes Plugin version 2.9

2013-03-03 Thread Mirko Friedenhagen
+0.5 (non-binding) the documentation at http://maven.apache.org/plugins-archives/maven-changes-plugin-2.9/announcement-generate-mojo.html#issueManagementSystems does not list GitHub (or Trac) as valid system. So I had to configure the changes-plugin to explicitly use GitHub although this is the

Re: [VOTE] Apache Maven PMD Plugin 3.0.1

2013-03-06 Thread Mirko Friedenhagen
+1 (non-binding) Regards Mirko - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org

Re: The next major release of Maven: 4.0.0

2013-03-09 Thread Mirko Friedenhagen
Well at least with Maven 4.0 I would not get the question anymore, why the pom's model version is at 4 while we use Maven 3 ;-). Regards Mirko -- Sent from my mobile On Mar 9, 2013 12:15 AM, Brian Fox bri...@infinity.nu wrote: I don't think we should move to 4.0 because of this. The primary

Re: [VOTE] Apache Maven Shared Incremental 1.1 and Apache Maven Compiler Plugin 3.1 (take 2)

2013-04-02 Thread Mirko Friedenhagen
Hello Oliver, in the staging repository there is no version 3.1 of the compiler plugin, only 3.2, see: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/maven-050/org/apache/maven/plugins/maven-compiler-plugin/ Regards Mirko -- http://illegalstateexception.blogspot.com/

Re: [VOTE] Apache Maven Shared Incremental 1.1 and Apache Maven Compiler Plugin 3.1 (take 2)

2013-04-02 Thread Mirko Friedenhagen
Hello Olivier, maven-compiler-plugin-3.2 uses the new maven-shared-incremental-1.1 and these are in two staging repositories, both have to be included as repositories, Regards Mirko Regards Mirko -- http://illegalstateexception.blogspot.com/ https://github.com/mfriedenhagen/

Re: [VOTE] Apache Maven Shared Incremental 1.1 and Apache Maven Compiler Plugin 3.1 (take 2)

2013-04-02 Thread Mirko Friedenhagen
+1 (non-binding) tested with two small projects. Regards Mirko -- http://illegalstateexception.blogspot.com/ https://github.com/mfriedenhagen/ https://bitbucket.org/mfriedenhagen/ On Tue, Apr 2, 2013 at 9:38 PM, Mirko Friedenhagen mfriedenha...@gmail.comwrote: Hello Olivier, maven-compiler

How to force ONE staging repository on oss.sonatype.org Was: [VOTE] Apache Maven Shared Incremental 1.1 and Apache Maven Compiler Plugin 3.1 (take 2)

2013-04-02 Thread Mirko Friedenhagen
Hello, should this be documented for further stagings :-)? Regards Mirko -- Sent from my mobile On Apr 2, 2013 11:58 PM, Olivier Lamy ol...@apache.org wrote: I know. I did as usual but no idea what happened on the mrm 2013/4/3 Mirko Friedenhagen mfriedenha...@gmail.com: Hello Olivier

Re: [VOTE] Release Maven Reporting Exec version 1.1

2013-04-14 Thread Mirko Friedenhagen
Hello, I tried this with one multi-module project, Maven-3.0.5 had no issues but with Apache Maven 3.1.0-alpha-1 (262b9bb1ef91d1414e5162d9dd0f5522e7186202; 2013-03-30 22:38:49+0100) I got an exception in the dependency-plugin: [INFO] Generating Dependencies report---

Re: [VOTE] Release Maven Dependency Tree version 2.1

2013-05-03 Thread Mirko Friedenhagen
Hello Hervé, as an enduser, I just define this as a dependency to e.g. the maven-dependency-plugin, right? Regards Mirko -- Sent from my mobile On May 3, 2013 2:04 AM, Hervé BOUTEMY herve.bout...@free.fr wrote: Hi, We solved 2 issues:

Re: [VOTE] Release Maven Site Plugin version 3.3

2013-05-12 Thread Mirko Friedenhagen
+1 (non-binding) tested with one multi-module, one library and one pom project, no issues observed. Regards Mirko -- http://illegalstateexception.blogspot.com/ https://github.com/mfriedenhagen/ https://bitbucket.org/mfriedenhagen/ On Fri, May 10, 2013 at 1:00 AM, Hervé BOUTEMY

Re: [VOTE] Release Maven Dependency Plugin version 2.8

2013-05-12 Thread Mirko Friedenhagen
+1 (non-binding) tested with two projects, compared to 2.7 verbose is working displaying much more output. Regards Mirko -- http://illegalstateexception.blogspot.com/ https://github.com/mfriedenhagen/ https://bitbucket.org/mfriedenhagen/ On Sun, May 12, 2013 at 4:50 PM, Hervé BOUTEMY

Re: [VOTE] Release Maven Project Info Reports Plugin version 2.7

2013-05-12 Thread Mirko Friedenhagen
+1 (non-binding) tested with one single and one multi-module project, source Repository now displays valid instructions for GIT and for multi-module projects modules are shown in about of parent pom. Regards Mirko -- http://illegalstateexception.blogspot.com/ https://github.com/mfriedenhagen/

maven-surefire-report-plugin: why is lifecycle phase validate called for report-only goals?

2013-05-27 Thread Mirko Friedenhagen
Hello, looking at the documentation for the report-only[1] resp. failsafe-report-only[2]: - Both goals are invoking phase validate in lifecycle surefire. - This will trigger for execution of e.g. enforcer:enforce or buildnumber:create at least twice again. - Depending on the ruleset, this may

Re: [VOTE] Apache 3.1.0-alpha-1

2013-05-29 Thread Mirko Friedenhagen
On May 29, 2013 7:49 AM, jieryn jie...@gmail.com wrote: Greetings, On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 1:36 AM, Hervé BOUTEMY herve.bout...@free.fr wrote: I'd like to work on Arnaud's idea of error message enhancement in case a plugin fails because of unavailable Sonatype Aether: if you can let me 12

Re: [VOTE] Apache 3.1.0-alpha-1

2013-05-29 Thread Mirko Friedenhagen
On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 10:17 AM, Arnaud Héritier aherit...@gmail.com wrote: But having said all that, if we can find a good way to flag versions as not released (e.g. a release history page or something) I am not against skipping version numbers. Might confuse people though if that meant that

Re: [VOTE] Should we respin CANCELLED releases with the same version number?

2013-05-29 Thread Mirko Friedenhagen
Non-bindingly: +1 for pre-releases -1 for actual releases Regards Mirko -- http://illegalstateexception.blogspot.com/ https://github.com/mfriedenhagen/ https://bitbucket.org/mfriedenhagen/ On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 10:00 PM, Baptiste MATHUS bmat...@batmat.net wrote: You're right, my bad. I just

Re: [VOTE] Should we respin CANCELLED releases with the same version number?

2013-06-01 Thread Mirko Friedenhagen
On May 31, 2013 12:08 PM, Stephen Connolly stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com wrote: Yes 3.1.0-alpha-1 has had/will have at least four respins... primarily because the volunteers have been slow stepping up and testing... And something not voted on, but with different logger implementations had

Re: [VOTE] Should we respin CANCELLED releases with the same version number?

2013-06-01 Thread Mirko Friedenhagen
And btw. even SNAPSHOTs are nowadays deployed with a timestamp and so more easily identifiable. I like James approach x.y.z-candidate but would be happy with steps in z as well. Regards Mirko -- Sent from my mobile On Jun 1, 2013 8:44 AM, Mirko Friedenhagen mfriedenha...@gmail.com wrote

Re: [VOTE] Apache 3.1.0-alpha-1 (Take 4)

2013-06-01 Thread Mirko Friedenhagen
+1 (non-binding) for (c726cdd3a9ad5c3a419e1171f8c1925e336ead18): - I successfully ran mvn verify site for some of my own projects (pom-only, one jar, multi-module). - the current trunk of maven-javadoc-plugin encountered some failing ITs. [ERROR] * additionnal-dependencies-non-aggregate/pom.xml

Re: [VOTE] Release Maven Surefire Plugin version 2.15

2013-06-08 Thread Mirko Friedenhagen
+1 (non-binding) Regards Mirko -- http://illegalstateexception.blogspot.com/ https://github.com/mfriedenhagen/ https://bitbucket.org/mfriedenhagen/ On Fri, Jun 7, 2013 at 8:29 AM, Andreas Gudian andreas.gud...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, This is my first release, so please check carefully what I may

Re: [VOTE] Release Maven Enforcer version 1.3

2013-06-22 Thread Mirko Friedenhagen
+1 (non-binding) tested with two homegrown plugins, the extra-enforcer-rules and one small multi-module project. Regards Mirko -- http://illegalstateexception.blogspot.com/ https://github.com/mfriedenhagen/ https://bitbucket.org/mfriedenhagen/ On Sat, Jun 22, 2013 at 2:26 PM, Robert Scholte

Re: [VOTE] Release Maven Enforcer version 1.3

2013-06-23 Thread Mirko Friedenhagen
Hello, I did the tests wrongly for extra-enforcer-rules, the new version of enforcer is backwards incompatible: org.apache.maven.plugins.enforcer.AbstractStandardEnforcerRule had a public message field in 1.2, this is now (1.3) private and uses getMessage and setMessage methods. This would mean

Re: Release process updates

2013-06-26 Thread Mirko Friedenhagen
Hello there, when. respinning a release it would of help IMO instead of deleting the tag to rename it to e.g. maven-javadoc-plugin-2.9-rc1 using svn mv. By means of this you are able to easily diff between e.g. released 2.8 and the final 2.9 as well as between 2.9-rc1 and the final 2.9. Regards

Re: Release process updates

2013-06-27 Thread Mirko Friedenhagen
Hello, this seems to be the most popular discussion, so another 2 cents: - Today I read the man page of git-tag again. - It states very clearly you should never reuse tags, because unlike is the case with subversion, once a git tag is out in the wild (and pushing to git-wip is the jungle here),

Re: Release process updates

2013-06-28 Thread Mirko Friedenhagen
a change like this. Kristian 2013/6/28 Ralph Goers ralph.go...@dslextreme.com: Can you provide the steps required to get the release plugin to work this way? Ralph On Jun 27, 2013, at 2:24 PM, Mirko Friedenhagen wrote: Hello, this seems to be the most popular discussion, so another 2 cents

Re: Release process updates

2013-06-29 Thread Mirko Friedenhagen
the release plugin to work this way? Ralph On Jun 27, 2013, at 2:24 PM, Mirko Friedenhagen wrote: Hello, this seems to be the most popular discussion, so another 2 cents: - Today I read the man page of git-tag again. - It states very

Re: [VOTE] Apache 3.1.0

2013-06-30 Thread Mirko Friedenhagen
+1 (non-binding) tested with some projects. Regards Mirko -- http://illegalstateexception.blogspot.com/ https://github.com/mfriedenhagen/ https://bitbucket.org/mfriedenhagen/ On Sun, Jun 30, 2013 at 9:00 PM, Jason van Zyl ja...@tesla.io wrote: Here are the release bits for 3.1.0: Release

Re: [VOTE] Apache 3.1.0

2013-06-30 Thread Mirko Friedenhagen
So probably this is: https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=maven.git;a=commit;h=893ca28a1da9d5f51ac03827af98bb730128f9f2 :-) Regards Mirko -- http://illegalstateexception.blogspot.com/ https://github.com/mfriedenhagen/ https://bitbucket.org/mfriedenhagen/ On Sun, Jun 30, 2013 at 9:00 PM,

How Maven works - definitions

2013-07-07 Thread Mirko Friedenhagen
Hello, I did not find an overview and now am trying to explain firstly myself and afterwards maybe others how Maven works (to other developers): - Maven is a declarative tool to build software, which relies mainly on conventions. - Declarations are done in a XML file called pom (project object

Re: How Maven works - definitions

2013-07-07 Thread Mirko Friedenhagen
contains images but no source code, for example. 2013/7/7 Mirko Friedenhagen mfriedenha...@gmail.com Hello, I did not find an overview and now am trying to explain firstly myself and afterwards maybe others how Maven works (to other developers): - Maven is a declarative

Re: How Maven works - definitions

2013-07-13 Thread Mirko Friedenhagen
email peuvent facilement être sujets à la manipulation, nous ne pouvons accepter aucune responsabilité pour le contenu fourni. Date: Mon, 8 Jul 2013 07:01:18 +0930 Subject: Re: How Maven works - definitions From: baerr...@gmail.com To: dev@maven.apache.org On 8 July 2013 04:01, Mirko

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven Enforcer version 1.3.1

2013-07-13 Thread Mirko Friedenhagen
Robert, I tried to run the integration-tests of the extra-enforcer-rules but most ITs just fail: [ERROR] The following builds failed: [ERROR] * circular-simple/pom.xml [ERROR] * enforce-bytecode-version-jdkVersionOption/pom.xml [ERROR] * enforce-bytecode-version-with-banned-deps/pom.xml

Re: Java version usage survey

2013-07-15 Thread Mirko Friedenhagen
On Jul 16, 2013 2:08 AM, Arnaud Héritier aherit...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, Java 6 EOL was in feb and Maven and its plugins are always compatible with Java 5 (And probably various plugins with Java 4). Couldn't it be interesting to see which JDKs our users are using to see how we can

Re: Log4j2/Logback integration updates

2013-07-15 Thread Mirko Friedenhagen
I would prefer going from JDK5 to 7 immediately as well, old JDK means usage of old tools. Regards Mirko -- Sent from my mobile On Jul 16, 2013 7:07 AM, Stephen Connolly stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com wrote: So what I am hearing is that until we bump core to require JDK6 (or 7) then logback

Re: Java version usage survey

2013-07-16 Thread Mirko Friedenhagen
What I do not really understand: - Say I am a company which are forced to run JDK1.5 because they have to recertificate everything due to Sarbains-Oxley or German GOBS. - Would I not force my developers to use the same tools to build they used for previous versions, then? - Maven 3 behaves

Re: [VOTE] All new (non-patch) releases of Maven Core after 30th Sep 2013 to require Java 6+

2013-07-25 Thread Mirko Friedenhagen
+1 non-binding On Jul 23, 2013 4:00 PM, Stephen Connolly stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com wrote: This vote is to cover the minimum required version of Java for Maven Core. Maven Plugins produced by the Apache Maven Project that are flagged as compatible with older versions of Maven Core as

  1   2   3   >