Re: next level of compatibility (was Re: [maven-site] branch master updated: few precisions)

2020-05-30 Thread Hervé BOUTEMY
Le mardi 26 mai 2020, 00:05:39 CEST Robert Scholte a écrit : > I missed the proposal for the version. I saw 3.2.5 and that can't be > correct, hence I tried to explain what the correct version should be. So > correct minimum version will be one of: 3.0, 3.1.0, 3.2.1, 3.3.1, 3.5.0 > This is the

Re: next level of compatibility (was Re: [maven-site] branch master updated: few precisions)

2020-05-26 Thread Olivier Lamy
On Tue, 26 May 2020 at 22:47, Elliotte Rusty Harold wrote: > I don't think I've seen anything earlier than 3.3.x in recent memory, > but 3.3.x is definitely still out there in the wild being used for new > development. > > Given the massive amount of important work that remains to be done to >

Re: next level of compatibility (was Re: [maven-site] branch master updated: few precisions)

2020-05-26 Thread Elliotte Rusty Harold
I don't think I've seen anything earlier than 3.3.x in recent memory, but 3.3.x is definitely still out there in the wild being used for new development. Given the massive amount of important work that remains to be done to upgrade plugins to Maven 3.1 and Java 7, or even Maven 3 and Java 5, I

Re: next level of compatibility (was Re: [maven-site] branch master updated: few precisions)

2020-05-26 Thread Olivier Lamy
On Tue, 26 May 2020 at 9:00 pm, Anders Hammar wrote: > On Tue, May 26, 2020 at 8:37 AM Olivier Lamy wrote: > > > On Tue, 26 May 2020 at 08:05, Robert Scholte > wrote: > > > > > I think it is pretty impressive that we can say that our plugins still > > > support a wide range of Maven versions.

Re: next level of compatibility (was Re: [maven-site] branch master updated: few precisions)

2020-05-26 Thread Anders Hammar
On Tue, May 26, 2020 at 8:37 AM Olivier Lamy wrote: > On Tue, 26 May 2020 at 08:05, Robert Scholte wrote: > > > I think it is pretty impressive that we can say that our plugins still > > support a wide range of Maven versions. > > > > So my vote will be 3.1.0 > > > > even if it doesn't happen

Re: next level of compatibility (was Re: [maven-site] branch master updated: few precisions)

2020-05-26 Thread Olivier Lamy
On Tue, 26 May 2020 at 08:05, Robert Scholte wrote: > I missed the proposal for the version. I saw 3.2.5 and that can't be > correct, hence I tried to explain what the correct version should be. > So correct minimum version will be one of: 3.0, 3.1.0, 3.2.1, 3.3.1, 3.5.0 > This is the version we

Re: next level of compatibility (was Re: [maven-site] branch master updated: few precisions)

2020-05-25 Thread Robert Scholte
I missed the proposal for the version. I saw 3.2.5 and that can't be correct, hence I tried to explain what the correct version should be. So correct minimum version will be one of: 3.0, 3.1.0, 3.2.1, 3.3.1, 3.5.0 This is the version we should compile with, our integration tests use the latest

Re: next level of compatibility (was Re: [maven-site] branch master updated: few precisions)

2020-05-25 Thread Olivier Lamy
@All Can we update the compatibility plan document saying we support from 3.5.4 and 3.6.3. plugins will use API from 3.5.4 and can use java8 from now (June 2020) . As 3.7.0 is on his way (soon) supporting 3 series seems enough. (with 3.7.0 using java8) @Robert As you didn't answer, I wonder if you

Re: next level of compatibility (was Re: [maven-site] branch master updated: few precisions)

2020-05-24 Thread Michael Osipov
Am 2020-05-24 um 10:41 schrieb Olivier Lamy: On Sat, 23 May 2020 at 21:33, Robert Scholte wrote: As discussed before: compatibility should either be 3.3.1 (since 3.3.0 didn't make it) or 3.5.0, we should not include the (highest) bugfix version. Great this means we can can rid of this

Re: next level of compatibility (was Re: [maven-site] branch master updated: few precisions)

2020-05-24 Thread Olivier Lamy
On Sat, 23 May 2020 at 21:33, Robert Scholte wrote: > As discussed before: compatibility should either be 3.3.1 (since 3.3.0 > didn't make it) or 3.5.0, we should not include the (highest) bugfix > version. > Great this means we can can rid of this hackhish refection stuff for aether... you

Re: next level of compatibility (was Re: [maven-site] branch master updated: few precisions)

2020-05-23 Thread Robert Scholte
As discussed before: compatibility should either be 3.3.1 (since 3.3.0 didn't make it) or 3.5.0, we should not include the (highest) bugfix version. Robert On 23-5-2020 12:43:35, Arnaud Héritier wrote: +1 On Sat, May 23, 2020 at 11:13 AM Enrico Olivelli wrote: > +1 > > Enrico > > Il Sab 23

Re: next level of compatibility (was Re: [maven-site] branch master updated: few precisions)

2020-05-23 Thread Arnaud Héritier
+1 On Sat, May 23, 2020 at 11:13 AM Enrico Olivelli wrote: > +1 > > Enrico > > Il Sab 23 Mag 2020, 09:40 Sylwester Lachiewicz ha > scritto: > > > +1 > > > > sob., 23 maj 2020, 09:22 użytkownik Hervé BOUTEMY > > > napisał: > > > > > Le vendredi 22 mai 2020, 02:13:16 CEST Olivier Lamy a écrit :

Re: next level of compatibility (was Re: [maven-site] branch master updated: few precisions)

2020-05-23 Thread Enrico Olivelli
+1 Enrico Il Sab 23 Mag 2020, 09:40 Sylwester Lachiewicz ha scritto: > +1 > > sob., 23 maj 2020, 09:22 użytkownik Hervé BOUTEMY > napisał: > > > Le vendredi 22 mai 2020, 02:13:16 CEST Olivier Lamy a écrit : > > > > + * discussions on Maven > 3.0.x (3.1 or 3.2 or 3.3? details still > > TDB) +

Re: next level of compatibility (was Re: [maven-site] branch master updated: few precisions)

2020-05-23 Thread Sylwester Lachiewicz
+1 sob., 23 maj 2020, 09:22 użytkownik Hervé BOUTEMY napisał: > Le vendredi 22 mai 2020, 02:13:16 CEST Olivier Lamy a écrit : > > > + * discussions on Maven > 3.0.x (3.1 or 3.2 or 3.3? details still > TDB) + > > > Java 8 prerequisites > > > > Don't be shy Hervé we can definitely says >= 3.3.9

next level of compatibility (was Re: [maven-site] branch master updated: few precisions)

2020-05-23 Thread Hervé BOUTEMY
Le vendredi 22 mai 2020, 02:13:16 CEST Olivier Lamy a écrit : > > + * discussions on Maven > 3.0.x (3.1 or 3.2 or 3.3? details still TDB) + > > Java 8 prerequisites > > Don't be shy Hervé we can definitely says >= 3.3.9 (at least you will not > hear any objections from me :) ) looking at our

Re: [maven-site] branch master updated: few precisions

2020-05-21 Thread Olivier Lamy
On Thu, 21 May 2020 at 16:43, wrote: > This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository. > > hboutemy pushed a commit to branch master > in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/maven-site.git > > > The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/master by this push: