Re: Documentation 404 links

2021-07-17 Thread Robert Scholte
Please create a PR for  https://github.com/apache/maven-toolchains-plugin/blob/master/src/site/apt/index.apt.vm thanks, Robert On 17-7-2021 02:44:32, leerho wrote: The docs page for the maven-toolchains-plugin has 4 non-working links: user mailing list ->

Re: Documentation error?

2009-09-07 Thread Benjamin Bentmann
Ioannis Deligiannis wrote: Is states the following: systemPath${java.home}/../lib/tools.jar/systemPath If not obvious, let say that java.home=c:\java\jdk1 But this should resolve to: C:\java\lib\tools.jar which is wrong. Usually, ${java.home} points to the private JRE of the JDK, e.g.

RE: Documentation error?

2009-09-07 Thread Ioannis Deligiannis
Thanks for the clarification. Although, I use JRE_HOME to point to my JRE 8-) Ioannis Deligiannis| Senior Application Engineer -Original Message- From: Benjamin Bentmann [mailto:benjamin.bentm...@udo.edu] Sent: Monday, September 07, 2009 2:42 PM To: Maven Developers List Subject: Re

Re: Documentation for import scope

2008-03-21 Thread Ralph Goers
I updated the introduction to dependency mechanism page and built the site locally. I then checked it in. The last time I did this was in September and I can't for the life of me remember how to publish the site - I remember logging in to people.apache.org and doing some stuff over there. I've

RE: Documentation for import scope

2008-03-21 Thread Brian E. Fox
Ralph, I'll gladly publish the site...just commit the guide and have a nice vacation! Thanks for pulling it together last minute. --Brian -Original Message- From: Ralph Goers [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, March 21, 2008 6:35 PM To: Maven Developers List Subject: Re

Re: Documentation for import scope

2008-03-21 Thread Ralph Goers
-Original Message- From: Ralph Goers [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, March 21, 2008 6:35 PM To: Maven Developers List Subject: Re: Documentation for import scope I updated the introduction to dependency mechanism page and built the site locally. I then checked it in. The last time I did

RE: Documentation for import scope

2008-03-05 Thread Brian E. Fox
That's good, but it's better to have an actual IT that gets run too. -Original Message- From: Ralph Goers [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, March 04, 2008 11:09 PM To: Maven Developers List Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Documentation for import scope There is a test

RE: Documentation for import scope

2008-03-04 Thread Brian E. Fox
Ralph: can we get some Its for this too? We want to make 2.0.9 final this week. -Original Message- From: Ralph Goers [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2008 8:32 PM To: Maven Developers List Subject: Re: Documentation for import scope http://marc.info/?l=turbine

Re: Documentation for import scope

2008-03-04 Thread Ralph Goers
To: Maven Developers List Subject: Re: Documentation for import scope http://marc.info/?l=turbine-maven-devm=119061621617466w=2 http://marc.info/?l=turbine-maven-devm=119061621501107w=2 These were reverted. I just need to get it back and make some minor updates. Ralph Brett Porter wrote: On 29/02

Re: Documentation for import scope

2008-02-28 Thread Ralph Goers
I checked it in before so it is still in SVN. I just have to put that version back on top. Where do the release notes go? Ralph Brett Porter wrote: I think this is mostly for Ralph... I wasn't able to find any documentation for the import scope in the site. I was wondering if you could add

Re: Documentation for import scope

2008-02-28 Thread Brett Porter
On 29/02/2008, at 11:22 AM, Ralph Goers wrote: I checked it in before so it is still in SVN. I just have to put that version back on top. Sorry, not quite sure what you mean - can you point me to it? Where do the release notes go? site/src/site/apt/release-notes.apt.vm - I was going

Re: Documentation for import scope

2008-02-28 Thread Ralph Goers
http://marc.info/?l=turbine-maven-devm=119061621617466w=2 http://marc.info/?l=turbine-maven-devm=119061621501107w=2 These were reverted. I just need to get it back and make some minor updates. Ralph Brett Porter wrote: On 29/02/2008, at 11:22 AM, Ralph Goers wrote: I checked it in before so

Re: Documentation for import scope

2008-02-28 Thread Brett Porter
Cool. On 29/02/2008, at 12:31 PM, Ralph Goers wrote: http://marc.info/?l=turbine-maven-devm=119061621617466w=2 http://marc.info/?l=turbine-maven-devm=119061621501107w=2 These were reverted. I just need to get it back and make some minor updates. Ralph Brett Porter wrote: On 29/02/2008,

Re: Documentation Plan

2007-10-05 Thread olivier lamy
Agree to remove old content. The home need some work : adding the download link, google search box as in maven home and some more words on the project. -- Olivier 2007/10/5, Emmanuel Venisse [EMAIL PROTECTED]: What do you think if I remove Old versions from the menu? We don't have a 1.0.x

Re: Documentation Plan

2007-09-25 Thread Emmanuel Venisse
I'm agree Emmanuel Joakim Erdfelt a écrit : The order is a little odd. I would personally put the User's Guide as more important than the Developer's Guides. The FAQ should be higher in the list too. - Joakim Emmanuel Venisse wrote: Hi, Here is the structure of the documentation I'd

Re: Documentation Plan

2007-09-25 Thread Emmanuel Venisse
Wendy Smoak a écrit : On 9/24/07, Emmanuel Venisse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: For 1.0.3 doc, we'll let it as is but we must remove specific 1.1 doc in it. How will this be handled? Do we need continuum/1.0.3 and continuum/1.1 on the website? I don't know but if we remove 1.0.3 doc, how

Re: Documentation Plan

2007-09-25 Thread Brett Porter
The layout below with stated modifications sounds good to me. See also on archiva-dev today: B77F0688-E66D-4D24-A65E- [EMAIL PROTECTED] under [proposal] Move Archiva's wiki to cwiki.apache.org for the different types I'd like to see. I think the documentation can be deployed to /docs/1.1,

Re: Documentation Plan

2007-09-24 Thread Joakim Erdfelt
The order is a little odd. I would personally put the User's Guide as more important than the Developer's Guides. The FAQ should be higher in the list too. - Joakim Emmanuel Venisse wrote: Hi, Here is the structure of the documentation I'd like to have for 1.1-final.

Re: Documentation Plan

2007-09-24 Thread olivier lamy
Agree on this comments. User Guide could be the second entry. The structure is fine. (now we have to populate this) -- Olivier 2007/9/24, Joakim Erdfelt [EMAIL PROTECTED]: The order is a little odd. I would personally put the User's Guide as more important than the Developer's Guides. The

Re: Documentation Plan

2007-09-24 Thread Wendy Smoak
On 9/24/07, Emmanuel Venisse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: For 1.0.3 doc, we'll let it as is but we must remove specific 1.1 doc in it. How will this be handled? Do we need continuum/1.0.3 and continuum/1.1 on the website? -- Wendy

Re: Documentation

2006-03-14 Thread Piéroni Raphaël
Which wiki is the good one ? The one hosted by apache or the one hosted at codehaus ? And how difficult is it to have write access ? Regards, Raphaël 2006/3/14, Alexandre Poitras [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Ok the Maven team already offer a wiki to help write documentation so I guess we should start

Re: Documentation

2006-03-14 Thread Piéroni Raphaël
http://docs.codehaus.org/display/MAVENUSER/Home Here is the documentation wiki. I will upload tonite all i have on my private wiki. Which is only a starting point. Regards Raphaël 2006/3/14, Piéroni Raphaël [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Which wiki is the good one ? The one hosted by apache or the one

RE: Documentation

2006-03-14 Thread Vincent Massol
: Piéroni Raphaël [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: mardi 14 mars 2006 10:05 To: Maven Developers List Subject: Re: Documentation http://docs.codehaus.org/display/MAVENUSER/Home Here is the documentation wiki. I will upload tonite all i have on my private wiki. Which is only a starting

RE: Documentation

2006-03-14 Thread Jörg Schaible
Vincent Massol wrote on Tuesday, March 14, 2006 10:21 AM: Raphael, If you're doing to be doing some serious editing, I really recommend that you use TimTam. It's an offline confluence editor that runs in Eclipse. It's really worth it. I've been increasing my productivity by tenfolds with

Re: Documentation

2006-03-14 Thread Piéroni Raphaël
At home, my wiki is dokuwiki (and linux) What is the tool to use ? my favorite goes to http://docs.codehaus.org/display/MAVENUSER/Home as it will be nearer to what we will produce. Vincent, i use netbeans and not eclipse :) Regards Raphaël 2006/3/14, Jörg Schaible [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

RE: Documentation

2006-03-14 Thread Vincent Massol
-Original Message- From: Jörg Schaible [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: mardi 14 mars 2006 10:26 To: Maven Developers List Subject: RE: Documentation Vincent Massol wrote on Tuesday, March 14, 2006 10:21 AM: Raphael, If you're doing to be doing some serious editing, I

RE: Documentation

2006-03-14 Thread Vincent Massol
-Original Message- From: Piéroni Raphaël [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: mardi 14 mars 2006 10:43 To: Maven Developers List Subject: Re: Documentation At home, my wiki is dokuwiki (and linux) What is the tool to use ? my favorite goes to http://docs.codehaus.org/display

Re: Documentation

2006-03-14 Thread Alexandre Poitras
by tenfolds with it. Just an idea... -Vincent -Original Message- From: Piéroni Raphaël [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: mardi 14 mars 2006 10:05 To: Maven Developers List Subject: Re: Documentation http://docs.codehaus.org/display/MAVENUSER/Home Here is the documentation wiki

Re: Documentation

2006-03-14 Thread Piéroni Raphaël
2006 10:43 To: Maven Developers List Subject: Re: Documentation At home, my wiki is dokuwiki (and linux) What is the tool to use ? my favorite goes to http://docs.codehaus.org/display/MAVENUSER/Home as it will be nearer to what we will produce. Vincent, i use netbeans

Re: Documentation

2006-03-14 Thread Alexandre Poitras
: Re: Documentation At home, my wiki is dokuwiki (and linux) What is the tool to use ? my favorite goes to http://docs.codehaus.org/display/MAVENUSER/Home as it will be nearer to what we will produce. Vincent, i use netbeans and not eclipse :) It doesn't matter. Just

Re: Documentation

2006-03-13 Thread Wayne Fay
Alexandre, I'll be glad to help you in this effort, especially with the difficult English bits. ;-) Wayne On 3/13/06, Alexandre Poitras [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Ok I am getting tired to hear Maven documentation is awful. It is such a wonderful product, I really want to see it adopted

Re: Documentation

2006-03-13 Thread Piéroni Raphaël
Hi Alexandre, There is actually a discussion about the improvement of the site on the dev list. May you subscribe and participate ? I also created a Jira issue for a proposition of improvment: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-2143 Regards, Raphaël 2006/3/13, Wayne Fay [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

Re: Documentation

2006-03-13 Thread Alexandre Poitras
Cool! My idea was to start a structured wiki like Wikipedia to be able to work as a team but I don't want to create another unreadable wiki like most Apache projects already have. It's great for development efforts but not enough for end users. I'll take a look at the discussion first and see

Re: Documentation

2006-03-13 Thread Alexandre Poitras
Ok the Maven team already offer a wiki to help write documentation so I guess we should start writing there. I will give it a try as soon as possible. On 3/13/06, Alexandre Poitras [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Cool! My idea was to start a structured wiki like Wikipedia to be able to work as a team

Re: Documentation

2005-12-01 Thread Emmanuel Venisse
in maven-scm-site directory Emmanuel Wim Deblauwe a écrit : Hi, I'm willing to add some documentation, because I want to get to know how to do it. Where is the source code of the site now? regards, Wim 2005/12/1, Emmanuel Venisse [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Hi

Re: Documentation

2005-12-01 Thread Wim Deblauwe
Hi,I'm willing to add some documentation, because I want to get to know how to do it. Where is the source code of the site now?regards,Wim2005/12/1, Emmanuel Venisse [EMAIL PROTECTED]:Hi all,Actually maven-scm site is very poor. Are you volunteers to write some docs?We need :- explanations of scm

Re: documentation: broken links

2005-10-20 Thread Jason van Zyl
On Thu, 2005-10-20 at 13:08 +0200, jerome lacoste wrote: http://maven.apache.org/maven2/guides/introduction/introduction-to-plugins.html The following links are broken: Resources 1. Plugin development guide 2. Managing plugin configuration in large projects 3. Configuring