to me, going to sha1 only *for fingerprints* is the right move currently
going to sha256 would make people think that a strong fingerprint means a
stronger security: this is wrong
If you want security, check signatures (ie. .asc files, with corresponding
public keys) that are real security (done
Am 2018-04-06 um 22:38 schrieb Karl Heinz Marbaise:
Hi,
On 06/04/18 22:28, Michael Osipov wrote:
Am 2018-04-06 um 22:13 schrieb Karl Heinz Marbaise:
Hi,
On 06/04/18 21:54, Michael Osipov wrote:
Am 2018-04-06 um 21:50 schrieb Karl Heinz Marbaise:
Hi to all,
updated the download page having
Hi,
On 06/04/18 22:28, Michael Osipov wrote:
Am 2018-04-06 um 22:13 schrieb Karl Heinz Marbaise:
Hi,
On 06/04/18 21:54, Michael Osipov wrote:
Am 2018-04-06 um 21:50 schrieb Karl Heinz Marbaise:
Hi to all,
updated the download page having now sha256/sha512 links...
first step of the efforts
Am 2018-04-06 um 22:13 schrieb Karl Heinz Marbaise:
Hi,
On 06/04/18 21:54, Michael Osipov wrote:
Am 2018-04-06 um 21:50 schrieb Karl Heinz Marbaise:
Hi to all,
updated the download page having now sha256/sha512 links...
first step of the efforts to migrate away from .md5 to sha256/sha512..
Hi,
On 06/04/18 21:54, Michael Osipov wrote:
Am 2018-04-06 um 21:50 schrieb Karl Heinz Marbaise:
Hi to all,
updated the download page having now sha256/sha512 links...
first step of the efforts to migrate away from .md5 to sha256/sha512..
Most important:
https://maven.apache.org/download.cg
Am 2018-04-06 um 21:50 schrieb Karl Heinz Marbaise:
Hi to all,
updated the download page having now sha256/sha512 links...
first step of the efforts to migrate away from .md5 to sha256/sha512..
Most important:
https://maven.apache.org/download.cgi
WDYT ?
other changes/improvements ?
I wou
