+1 (binding)
On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 2:53 PM, Greg Mann wrote:
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> Did `sudo make check` on CentOS 7. Aside from several
> LinuxFilesystemIsolatorTests and two other flaky
> tests, CgroupsAnyHierarchyWithFreezerTest.ROOT_CGROUPS_
> DestroyTracedProcess
>
+1 (non-binding)
Did `sudo make check` on CentOS 7. Aside from several
LinuxFilesystemIsolatorTests and two other flaky
tests, CgroupsAnyHierarchyWithFreezerTest.ROOT_CGROUPS_DestroyTracedProcess
and MemoryPressureMesosTest.CGROUPS_ROOT_SlaveRecovery, everything passed.
Cheers,
Greg
On Wed, Nov
Joseph—
Thank you for investigating. I'm
+1 (binding)
make check passes on CentOS 7, Fedora 23, Ubuntu 14, 15 modulo known flaky
tests, including LinuxFilesystemIsolatorTest.ROOT_ChangeRootFilesystem.
On 29 Nov 2016 21:21, "Joseph Wu" wrote:
> AlexR,
>
> Thanks for
AlexR,
Thanks for pointing out those test failures. As of 0.28, the
LinuxFilesystemIsolatorTests were notoriously flaky on distributions with
"large" root filesystems. The test would essentially copy the root
filesystem, leading to timeouts in multiple places in the tests. CentOS 7
was known
+1 (binding)
Tested on ASF CI.
*Revision*: 52a0b0a41482da35dc736ec2fd445b6099e7a4e7
- refs/tags/0.28.3-rc1
Configuration Matrix gcc clang
centos:7 --verbose --enable-libevent --enable-ssl autotools
[image: Success]
I see LinuxFilesystemIsolatorTest.ROOT_ChangeRootFilesystem failing on
CentOS 7 and Fedora 23, see e.g., [1]. I don't see any backports touching
[2], can it be a regression or this test is know to be problematic in
0.28.x?
[1] http://pastebin.com/c5PzfGF8
[2]