> On Mar 13, 2018, at 3:58 PM, Greg Mann wrote:
>
> Sure we can use that as a starting point. The basic policy that we
> discussed in the working group was that any public API change should be
> advertised on the developer mailing list. If no concerns are raised after
>
Sure we can use that as a starting point. The basic policy that we
discussed in the working group was that any public API change should be
advertised on the developer mailing list. If no concerns are raised after
several days, then the change could proceed. If concerns were raised, then
discussion
+1 for keeping the policy in writing. Are we looking at the Traffic
Server's API policy as a starting point for discussion?
On Tue, Mar 13, 2018 at 10:12 AM, Greg Mann wrote:
> Hi all,
> As BenM mentioned in a recent email, we discussed our process for review of
> API