Hi,
I am doing POC on Apache metamodel for one of our requirement in project and
most of things are achievable using apache metamodel and its really a generic
data processing application.
Apart from database and file format we need to support the REST API as
connector and since REST doesn't fo
e support for full CRUD.
Best regards,
Dennis
-----Original Message-----
From: Vijay Kumar Jalagari [mailto:jalag...@adobe.com]
Sent: 18. juni 2016 00:44
To: dev@metamodel.apache.org
Subject: MetaModel REST connector
Hi,
I am doing POC on Apache metamodel for one of our requirement in project and
Hi,
I am trying JSON connector and facing issues while defining the multiple table
based on below JSON.
{ "name": "VJ",
"age": 29,
"accounts": [{
"type": "Saving",
"name": "HDFC"}, {
Hi,
OOTB JSON and XML connector doesn't implement UpdateableDataContext to write
back data uses.
Is there any planning of adding support of update on JSON & XML connector ?
Regards,
Vijay Kumar J
016-06-22 10:23 GMT-07:00 Vijay Kumar Jalagari :
> Hi,
>
> I am trying JSON connector and facing issues while defining the
> multiple table based on below JSON.
>
> { "name": "VJ",
> "age": 29,
>
sure. I think this isn't possible.
> But I kinda think we should make it possible somehow via the
> SchemaBuilder interface and some implementation that would allow this...
>
> Kasper
>
> 2016-06-23 9:47 GMT-07:00 Vijay Kumar Jalagari :
>
>> Yes, it will return List
Hi,
I couldn't able to find the unique index property on table column field, is it
left out intentionally ?
This property will be required to identity relation between tables is 1 to 1 or
1 to many.
Is there any way to find the relationship b/w tables is 1:1 or 1:many ?
Regards,
Vijay Kumar J
fer to a primary key,
not just any unique value.
Kasper
2016-06-30 5:55 GMT-07:00 Vijay Kumar Jalagari :
> Hi,
>
> I couldn't able to find the unique index property on table column
> field, is it left out intentionally ?
> This property will be required to identity relation
Hi,
is username and password is mandatory to connect Salesforce data context ?
Can we use the salesforce Oauth authentication ?
Regards,
Vijay Kumar J
Hi,
According to metamodel source its compatible with java 1.7 but OOTB jar
provided by maven artifactory is java 1.8 ( Build-Jdk: 1.8.0_77 )
One options is build the metamodel with 1.7 and include in required other
application but is there any better approach?
[0] - https://github.com/apache/
to work.
Kasper
2016-10-07 4:56 GMT-07:00 Vijay Kumar Jalagari :
> Hi,
>
> According to metamodel source its compatible with java 1.7 but OOTB
> jar provided by maven artifactory is java 1.8 ( Build-Jdk: 1.8.0_77 )
>
> One options is build the metamodel with 1.7 and include in
Subject: Re: Metamodel for java 1.7
Hi Vijay,
Not the cleanest solution, but since you probably need to wrap the bundle to
make it work in OSGi anyway, can't you overwrite the Build-Jdk?
BR,
Dennis
From: Vijay Kumar Jalagari
Sent: Monday, October 10,
Hi,
According to API document compiled query is for provide optimized execution
speed but if we are using SatisfiedQueryBuilder is there any chances of SQL
injection?
What is advantage of SatistiedQueryBuilder over compiled query?
Regards,
Vijay Kumar J
Vijay Kumar Jalagari would like to recall the message, "count / distinct SQL".
e
-Original Message-
From: Vijay Kumar Jalagari
Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2018 2:57 PM
To: dev@metamodel.apache.org
Subject: RE: count / distinct SQL
e
-Original Message-
From: Kasper Sørensen
Sent: Thursday, February 1, 2018 10:14 AM
To: dev@metamodel.apache.org
Subject
e
-Original Message-
From: Kasper Sørensen
Sent: Thursday, February 1, 2018 10:14 AM
To: dev@metamodel.apache.org
Subject: Re: count / distinct SQL
There's no direct equivalent to COUNT(DISTINCT x)) in MetaModel. But you could
get the same result using a subquery, and most database eng
Vijay Kumar Jalagari would like to recall the message, "count / distinct SQL".
Hi,
I am using Apache metamodel with data source PostgreSQL 11 and while executing
insert(InsertInto) or update statement query is failing if table column name
contains upper characters.
According to logs statement is generating properly but it seems postgresql is
converting column names to low
y a
> difference the table creation classes handles AFAIK, and I suspect we
> don't really expect case-sensitivity in PostgreSQL tables, but it's
> been quite a while for me, so I might remember wrong.
>
> Kasper, do you have some more insight?
>
> BR,
>
19 matches
Mail list logo