[GitHub] metamodel issue #120: RESTful MetaModel service-webapp

2017-07-22 Thread kaspersorensen
Github user kaspersorensen commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/metamodel/pull/120 Closing this PR as we now have a new repo for MetaModel Membrane. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your pro

[GitHub] metamodel issue #120: RESTful MetaModel service-webapp

2016-10-15 Thread kaspersorensen
Github user kaspersorensen commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/metamodel/pull/120 OK so I have been going over this in my mind again and again a few times. Couldn't quite make myself remove the tenant concept either :-P At least I feel it needs a bit more thought. One of

[GitHub] metamodel issue #120: RESTful MetaModel service-webapp

2016-09-30 Thread LosD
Github user LosD commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/metamodel/pull/120 H, good point. The thing is that if it is in a cluster, it's hard to get the docker image on the same instance (or even rack) as all the DBs it provides access to when there's many of th

[GitHub] metamodel issue #120: RESTful MetaModel service-webapp

2016-09-30 Thread kaspersorensen
Github user kaspersorensen commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/metamodel/pull/120 The way I see it is that Docker apps or microservices should try to do just a few things, and do them great. But the question is "what is the thing" then, because I think your interpretatio

[GitHub] metamodel issue #120: RESTful MetaModel service-webapp

2016-09-29 Thread LosD
Github user LosD commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/metamodel/pull/120 Yeah, that might make sense, though I'd only see an advantage in the non-Docker case (which is of course an entirely valid case... Easy to get Docker-tunnel-vision these days 😆). But in many cases

[GitHub] metamodel issue #120: RESTful MetaModel service-webapp

2016-09-29 Thread kaspersorensen
Github user kaspersorensen commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/metamodel/pull/120 Bummer ;-) But thanks for the honest feedback. Functionally speaking I think it is necesary to have at least a collection of datastores. You may be right that the tenant concept is too m

[GitHub] metamodel issue #120: RESTful MetaModel service-webapp

2016-09-28 Thread LosD
Github user LosD commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/metamodel/pull/120 I think the reason that you're missing reviews is exactly because it is so big. I've started a few times, and every time I've lost interest rather quickly. It seems a bit like shooting birds

[GitHub] metamodel issue #120: RESTful MetaModel service-webapp

2016-09-28 Thread kaspersorensen
Github user kaspersorensen commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/metamodel/pull/120 Bump :) I would like to see some progress on the review of this rather big feature. If anyone would give it a review it would be awesome. Or even a test using the before-mentioned docker im

[GitHub] metamodel issue #120: RESTful MetaModel service-webapp

2016-09-12 Thread kaspersorensen
Github user kaspersorensen commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/metamodel/pull/120 I've made a couple of changes to this PR today and to make it easier for people to review the webapp not just from a code perspective, but also from a user perspective, I've published my lo