[GitHub] metron pull request #685: METRON-1087: Adjust license headers to be comments...

2017-08-29 Thread justinleet
Github user justinleet closed the pull request at:

https://github.com/apache/metron/pull/685


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---


[GitHub] metron pull request #685: METRON-1087: Adjust license headers to be comments...

2017-08-11 Thread justinleet
GitHub user justinleet reopened a pull request:

https://github.com/apache/metron/pull/685

METRON-1087: Adjust license headers to be comments instead of Javadoc

## Contributor Comments
This does three things:
1. Changes Javadoc to just plain comment.
2. Fixes headers that have been affected by formatting (get rid of 
paragraph tags, weird formatting, and deleted spaces, etc.)
3. Adds a newline after the license, before the package statement.

Even though this affects a (very) large number of files, I left it as one 
PR.  This is mostly because even though there's many changes, the vast, vast 
majority are changing `/**` to `/*` and adding a newlines.  Only a couple dozen 
files actually have fixes beyond that.  If this is too large, too tedious, or 
GitHub does weird crap, let me know and I can split this up.  It was just 
easier when making the change to just find/replace and validate correctness 
afterwards.

Note that the newline in 3 is to meet the [Google Java Style 
Guide](https://google.github.io/styleguide/javaguide.html#s3-source-file-structure).
  This is not handled by the IDE formatter (at least in IntelliJ), 
unfortunately.
```
A source file consists of, in order:

1. License or copyright information, if present
2. Package statement
3. Import statements
4. Exactly one top-level class
Exactly one blank line separates each section that is present.
```

Validation is just opening a file and ensuring that autoformat doesn't 
change the license header.

~I still need to spin up full dev as a precaution, but given that it's all 
comments and whitespace, I'm expecting no issues.~

## Pull Request Checklist

Thank you for submitting a contribution to Apache Metron.  
Please refer to our [Development 
Guidelines](https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=61332235)
 for the complete guide to follow for contributions.  
Please refer also to our [Build Verification 
Guidelines](https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/METRON/Verifying+Builds?show-miniview)
 for complete smoke testing guides.  


In order to streamline the review of the contribution we ask you follow 
these guidelines and ask you to double check the following:

### For all changes:
- [x] Is there a JIRA ticket associated with this PR? If not one needs to 
be created at [Metron 
Jira](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/METRON/?selectedTab=com.atlassian.jira.jira-projects-plugin:summary-panel).
 
- [x] Does your PR title start with METRON- where  is the JIRA 
number you are trying to resolve? Pay particular attention to the hyphen "-" 
character.
- [x] Has your PR been rebased against the latest commit within the target 
branch (typically master)?


### For code changes:
- [x] Have you included steps to reproduce the behavior or problem that is 
being changed or addressed?
- [x] Have you included steps or a guide to how the change may be verified 
and tested manually?
- [x] Have ]you ensured that the full suite of tests and checks have been 
executed in the root metron folder via:
  ```
  mvn -q clean integration-test install && build_utils/verify_licenses.sh 
  ```

- [x] Have you verified the basic functionality of the build by building 
and running locally with Vagrant full-dev environment or the equivalent?

### For documentation related changes:
- [x] Have you ensured that format looks appropriate for the output in 
which it is rendered by building and verifying the site-book? If not then run 
the following commands and the verify changes via 
`site-book/target/site/index.html`:

  ```
  cd site-book
  mvn site
  ```

 Note:
Please ensure that once the PR is submitted, you check travis-ci for build 
issues and submit an update to your PR as soon as possible.
It is also recommended that [travis-ci](https://travis-ci.org) is set up 
for your personal repository such that your branches are built there before 
submitting a pull request.



You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:

$ git pull https://github.com/justinleet/metron license_comment_fix

Alternatively you can review and apply these changes as the patch at:

https://github.com/apache/metron/pull/685.patch

To close this pull request, make a commit to your master/trunk branch
with (at least) the following in the commit message:

This closes #685


commit 8a93d11389d8f2e961873470faea396bd311f83f
Author: justinjleet 
Date:   2017-08-04T19:18:13Z

Making the license not javadoc and putting newline before package

commit c584d88b4e177959e158436f11d444cac66eb562
Author: justinjleet 
Date:   2017-08-04T19:21:16Z

Fixing urls in licenses

commit e5b99c69450fa83b898a5f929e76725df876aee5
Author: justinjleet 
Date:   2017-08-11T11:53:04Z

Merge branc

[GitHub] metron pull request #685: METRON-1087: Adjust license headers to be comments...

2017-08-11 Thread justinleet
Github user justinleet closed the pull request at:

https://github.com/apache/metron/pull/685


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---


[GitHub] metron pull request #685: METRON-1087: Adjust license headers to be comments...

2017-08-11 Thread justinleet
Github user justinleet commented on a diff in the pull request:

https://github.com/apache/metron/pull/685#discussion_r132669235
  
--- Diff: 
metron-platform/metron-hbase/src/test/java/org/apache/metron/hbase/mock/MockHTable.java
 ---
@@ -16,7 +16,7 @@
  * limitations under the License.
  */
 
-package org.apache.metron.test.mock;
+package org.apache.metron.hbase.mock;
--- End diff --

Part of the upstream changes during the merge. Even though it's not mine, 
GitHub wants to show it as my change (because there was a conflict here I 
resolved).


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---


[GitHub] metron pull request #685: METRON-1087: Adjust license headers to be comments...

2017-08-04 Thread justinleet
GitHub user justinleet opened a pull request:

https://github.com/apache/metron/pull/685

METRON-1087: Adjust license headers to be comments instead of Javadoc

## Contributor Comments
This does three things:
1. Changes Javadoc to just plain comment.
2. Fixes headers that have been affected by formatting (get rid of 
paragraph tags, weird formatting, and deleted spaces, etc.)
3. Adds a newline after the license, before the package statement.

Even though this affects a (very) large number of files, I left it as one 
PR.  This is mostly because even though there's many changes, the vast, vast 
majority are changing `/**` to `/*` and adding a newlines.  Only a couple dozen 
files actually have fixes beyond that.  If this is too large, too tedious, or 
GitHub does weird crap, let me know and I can split this up.  It was just 
easier when making the change to just find/replace and validate correctness 
afterwards.

Note that the newline in 3 is to meet the [Google Java Style 
Guide](https://google.github.io/styleguide/javaguide.html#s3-source-file-structure).
  This is not handled by the IDE formatter (at least in IntelliJ), 
unfortunately.
```
A source file consists of, in order:

1. License or copyright information, if present
2. Package statement
3. Import statements
4. Exactly one top-level class
Exactly one blank line separates each section that is present.
```

Validation is just opening a file and ensuring that autoformat doesn't 
change the license header.

I still need to spin up full dev as a precaution, but given that it's all 
comments and whitespace, I'm expecting no issues.

## Pull Request Checklist

Thank you for submitting a contribution to Apache Metron.  
Please refer to our [Development 
Guidelines](https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=61332235)
 for the complete guide to follow for contributions.  
Please refer also to our [Build Verification 
Guidelines](https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/METRON/Verifying+Builds?show-miniview)
 for complete smoke testing guides.  


In order to streamline the review of the contribution we ask you follow 
these guidelines and ask you to double check the following:

### For all changes:
- [x] Is there a JIRA ticket associated with this PR? If not one needs to 
be created at [Metron 
Jira](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/METRON/?selectedTab=com.atlassian.jira.jira-projects-plugin:summary-panel).
 
- [x] Does your PR title start with METRON- where  is the JIRA 
number you are trying to resolve? Pay particular attention to the hyphen "-" 
character.
- [x] Has your PR been rebased against the latest commit within the target 
branch (typically master)?


### For code changes:
- [x] Have you included steps to reproduce the behavior or problem that is 
being changed or addressed?
- [x Have you included steps or a guide to how the change may be verified 
and tested manually?
- [x] Have ]you ensured that the full suite of tests and checks have been 
executed in the root metron folder via:
  ```
  mvn -q clean integration-test install && build_utils/verify_licenses.sh 
  ```

- [ ] Have you verified the basic functionality of the build by building 
and running locally with Vagrant full-dev environment or the equivalent?

### For documentation related changes:
- [ ] Have you ensured that format looks appropriate for the output in 
which it is rendered by building and verifying the site-book? If not then run 
the following commands and the verify changes via 
`site-book/target/site/index.html`:

  ```
  cd site-book
  mvn site
  ```

 Note:
Please ensure that once the PR is submitted, you check travis-ci for build 
issues and submit an update to your PR as soon as possible.
It is also recommended that [travis-ci](https://travis-ci.org) is set up 
for your personal repository such that your branches are built there before 
submitting a pull request.



You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:

$ git pull https://github.com/justinleet/metron license_comment_fix

Alternatively you can review and apply these changes as the patch at:

https://github.com/apache/metron/pull/685.patch

To close this pull request, make a commit to your master/trunk branch
with (at least) the following in the commit message:

This closes #685


commit 8a93d11389d8f2e961873470faea396bd311f83f
Author: justinjleet 
Date:   2017-08-04T19:18:13Z

Making the license not javadoc and putting newline before package

commit c584d88b4e177959e158436f11d444cac66eb562
Author: justinjleet 
Date:   2017-08-04T19:21:16Z

Fixing urls in licenses




---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well.