Re: Elasticsearch 5.x upgrade

[Otto Fowler]

The plan around the mpack with regards to elastic search and solr support
and options is extremely important and as of yet undecided.


On July 17, 2017 at 03:00:42, Simon Elliston Ball (
si...@simonellistonball.com) wrote:

> I assume you're taking about METRON-939. The upgrade is not a huge change,
> and unlikely to touch any of the bulk writing pieces. The main thing
> outstanding on the PR is log4j dependency conflicts from the new ES client.
>
> There's no work in that PR to do anything around mpack based install
> either so that's a fair chunk of outstanding busy work and significant
> testing.
>
> Simon
>
> On 17 Jul 2017, at 12:39, Ali Nazemian  wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> I've heard there is a plan to upgrade Elasticsearch from 2.x to 5.x
> regarding Metron and Ambari mpack. I was wondering when that will happen.
> Is there any part in Metron Elasticsearch indexing that will be impacted
> by
> this upgrade? Like any change from the way of bulk-indexing?
>
> Cheers,
> Ali
>
>

Re: Elasticsearch 5.x upgrade

[Simon Elliston Ball]

I assume you're taking about METRON-939. The upgrade is not a huge change, and 
unlikely to touch any of the bulk writing pieces. The main thing outstanding on 
the PR is log4j dependency conflicts from the new ES client.

There's no work in that PR to do anything around mpack based install either so 
that's a fair chunk of outstanding busy work and significant testing.

Simon

> On 17 Jul 2017, at 12:39, Ali Nazemian  wrote:
> 
> Hi all,
> 
> I've heard there is a plan to upgrade Elasticsearch from 2.x to 5.x
> regarding Metron and Ambari mpack. I was wondering when that will happen.
> Is there any part in Metron Elasticsearch indexing that will be impacted by
> this upgrade? Like any change from the way of bulk-indexing?
> 
> Cheers,
> Ali