I don't think this instance is a big deal. But ideally I think any
changes, including a fix like this, should go through the PR process.
On Fri, Sep 8, 2017 at 10:44 PM Casey Stella wrote:
> So, generally the goal is to commit the minimal set of commits squashed by
>
So, generally the goal is to commit the minimal set of commits squashed by
contributor. For situations that are wacky and end up with a conflict, I
don't think it's a problem. No worries, IMO.
On Fri, Sep 8, 2017 at 10:29 PM, Otto Fowler
wrote:
> Is what I did against
Is what I did against policy? What should I have done?
I think the committer’s guide is archived btw.
On September 8, 2017 at 22:12:27, Casey Stella (ceste...@gmail.com) wrote:
I don't have an issue with this; it's good to have the explanation. I also
found that we weren't running the
That's very weird.
On Fri, Sep 8, 2017 at 10:12 PM, Otto Fowler
wrote:
> without re-writing my other reply:
> I use the prepare-commit into a clean repo every time, so I believe that
> this issue
> *was* in the apache repo.
>
>
> On September 8, 2017 at 22:08:02, Casey
without re-writing my other reply:
I use the prepare-commit into a clean repo every time, so I believe that
this issue
*was* in the apache repo.
On September 8, 2017 at 22:08:02, Casey Stella (ceste...@gmail.com) wrote:
My guess is that what happened was otto did a pull of METRON-1061 into his
I don't have an issue with this; it's good to have the explanation. I also
found that we weren't running the dependency analyzer as part of travis
(or, we thought we were, but we weren't) until METRON-1169. Thanks otto
for the explanation and jon for catching it.
On Fri, Sep 8, 2017 at 10:09
Yes, that was me.
I was committing a pr, and got an error on this while building and testing.
it was introduced by an earlier pr. I sent an email to the list at the
time:
My guess is that what happened was otto did a pull of METRON-1061 into his
master, but it wasn't *quite* in sync with master in apache and there was a
conflict in the dependencies_with_url.csv, so that commit was made locally
to fix the conflict. both commits, the squashed and the merge conflict
I was looking through some of the recent commits and I noticed this[1],
anybody know what the back story is there?
1:
https://github.com/apache/metron/commit/c8e84fa3be89901013168d15df38b8a58265148a
Jon
--
Jon