[GitHub] incubator-metron issue #188: METRON-227 (Time based flushing)

2016-11-23 Thread nickwallen
Github user nickwallen commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/incubator-metron/pull/188 Opened https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-12959 for Apache Infra to close this PR. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear

[GitHub] incubator-metron issue #188: METRON-227 (Time based flushing)

2016-10-12 Thread james-sirota
Github user james-sirota commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/incubator-metron/pull/188 I agree on the -1. There are additionally merge conflicts now with this pull request and I don't believe it's worthwhile to do the merge and change the implementation. It's easier to

[GitHub] incubator-metron issue #188: METRON-227 (Time based flushing)

2016-10-12 Thread mattf-horton
Github user mattf-horton commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/incubator-metron/pull/188 -1. Upon closer review, I find that there is no timer thread or similar mechanism implemented in this patch. Thus, the patch only works if there is a steady trickle of new tuples to

[GitHub] incubator-metron issue #188: METRON-227 (Time based flushing)

2016-10-11 Thread mmiklavc
Github user mmiklavc commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/incubator-metron/pull/188 Any new comments or actions for this PR? --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this

[GitHub] incubator-metron issue #188: METRON-227 (Time based flushing)

2016-07-21 Thread cestella
Github user cestella commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/incubator-metron/pull/188 There is one downside that I see, but I think it's acceptable. We currently keep configuration around the indexing in zookeeper so that the topology configuration can be adjusted on the

[GitHub] incubator-metron issue #188: METRON-227 (Time based flushing)

2016-07-21 Thread mmiklavc
Github user mmiklavc commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/incubator-metron/pull/188 It is a much simpler design and it leverages Storm's built-in mechanisms for performing actions like DB flushes. Also, you don't have to worry about multi-threading in your bolt if you

[GitHub] incubator-metron issue #188: METRON-227 (Time based flushing)

2016-07-21 Thread cestella
Github user cestella commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/incubator-metron/pull/188 @mmiklavc That is absolutely what the tick tuple was designed for. What are the pro/con versus the current proposed approach? --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this

[GitHub] incubator-metron issue #188: METRON-227 (Time based flushing)

2016-07-20 Thread mmiklavc
Github user mmiklavc commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/incubator-metron/pull/188 How about using Storm's built-in tick tuples for this? https://groups.google.com/forum/#!msg/storm-user/8addaQm3OT4/0OQfSgQkRwEJ --- If your project is set up for it, you can

[GitHub] incubator-metron issue #188: METRON-227 (Time based flushing)

2016-07-15 Thread ajayydv
Github user ajayydv commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/incubator-metron/pull/188 added test case --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and

[GitHub] incubator-metron issue #188: METRON-227 (Time based flushing)

2016-07-13 Thread cestella
Github user cestella commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/incubator-metron/pull/188 Whoops, forgot, we should probably have a unit test addition given this functionality. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on

[GitHub] incubator-metron issue #188: METRON-227 (Time based flushing)

2016-07-13 Thread cestella
Github user cestella commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/incubator-metron/pull/188 Great contribution, thanks! I had a few comments, but good job. :) --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your