Github user mmiklavc commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-metron/pull/415
Looks good @cestella . +1 pending Travis
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user JonZeolla commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-metron/pull/415
Isn't this a duplicate of
[METRON-470](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/METRON-470)?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on
Github user cestella commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-metron/pull/415
@JonZeolla Yes it is! Whoops, my bad. I guess my JIRA search-fu isn't as
good as I thought.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear
Github user mmiklavc commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-metron/pull/415
@dlyle65535 It definitely does that - I was referring to our json config
mainly.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as
Github user dlyle65535 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-metron/pull/415
@mmiklavc - doesn't Enrichment Master's config do the same thing for
enrichment.properties?
File(format("{metron_config_path}/enrichment.properties"),
Github user mmiklavc commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-metron/pull/415
@cestella Yeah, if we do a CONFIG_PUT via the Stellar REPL without updating
the local file system config copy, that's going to cause syncing problems.
---
If your project is set up for it
Github user mmiklavc commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-metron/pull/415
OK, found this for the global config in metron-env.xml
```
global-json
global.json template
This is the jinja template for global.json
Github user cestella commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-metron/pull/415
Ok, thanks @dlyle65535 I don't think it's a regression (since it doesn't
appear to be any different behavior-wise between when it existed in enrichment
vs in the new configs), but I do thi
Github user dlyle65535 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-metron/pull/415
Some yes and some no. I'm a bit bleary-eyed today, so I'm not sure if this
is the complete list- here's my current understanding. Ambari actively (will
overwrite) manages global.json, en
Github user cestella commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-metron/pull/415
@dlyle65535 I think that's a great point and thanks for clarifying.
Looking at that file, it appears that ambari is explicitly providing the
ability to modify the global config and certai
Github user dlyle65535 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-metron/pull/415
@merrimanr , @cestella - wrt management of configs from Ambari, the answer
is kinda. Sensible default configurations are pushed with certain
user-specified changes that allow the system
Github user cestella commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-metron/pull/415
Testing Instructions beyond the normal smoke test (i.e. letting data
flow through to the indices and checking them).
## Preliminaries
Since I will use the squid topolog
Github user cestella commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-metron/pull/415
@merrimanr I was under the impression that there was a panel to manage the
enrichment configurations per sensor in ambari, but if that's not the case and
it's just initial load, then I don
Github user merrimanr commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-metron/pull/415
What is the regression we're talking about? Are we talking about loading
the indexing configs initially with the Mpack or managing the configs in
Ambari?
I don't believe we ar
Github user cestella commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-metron/pull/415
@ottobackwards yeah, agreed. It's a fairly complex situation at the moment
and not documented very well. That might be worth a discussion on the dev list.
---
If your project is set up
Github user cestella commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-metron/pull/415
@dlyle65535 It definitely is a regression. I didn't make it clear enough
(I will do so now), but I very much do not want this PR to be committed before
the management pack PR is committed
Github user ottobackwards commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-metron/pull/415
Just a side note: with the rpms and docker everything, it is more
difficult than ever to have a handle on all the places you need to consider for
changes, I don't know if you want to
Github user dlyle65535 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-metron/pull/415
Thanks @cestella, makes total sense.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this fe
Github user dlyle65535 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-metron/pull/415
Hi @cestella,
Can you give me a little detail about the consequences of not exposing the
indexing config to Ambari? It seems like a regression to me, I recall we could
deploy no
19 matches
Mail list logo