Join slack channel

Hi there, I'm using MXNet for teaching and research, I'd love to join the slack channel for some questions. Thanks, --- Dr. Leonardo Espinosa aboutMe: http://www.espinosaleal.me

Re: Join slack channel

Hi, I would also like to join the slack channel. I'm trying to use mxnet in production. (Java API seems most production ready among all DL libraries.) --TongKe On Tue, Nov 7, 2017 at 1:11 AM, leonardo espinosa wrote: > Hi there, > > I'm using MXNet for teaching and

Data Pipeline Intermediate Representation in MXNet/NNVM

Hi, Tensorflow has a transform package https://github.com/tensorflow/transform which is capable of export a data preprocessing pipeline to a tensorflow graph, which can be incorporated into network graph. This package provides a neat way to manage data pipeline together with network graph, since

[VOTE] Release Apache MXNet(incubating) version 0.12.1.rc0

This is the vote to release Apache MXNet (incubating) version 0.12.1. Voting will start now (Tuesday, November 7, 2017) and close Friday, November 10, 2017 Link to release notes: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MXNET/MXNet+0.12.1+Release+Notes Link to release candidate

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache MXNet(incubating) version 0.12.1.rc0

+1 Binding On Tue, Nov 7, 2017 at 7:48 PM Meghna Baijal wrote: > This is the vote to release Apache MXNet (incubating) version 0.12.1. > > Voting will start now (Tuesday, November 7, 2017) and > > close Friday, November 10, 2017 > > > Link to release notes: > > >

[BUILD FAILED] Branch master build 603

Build for MXNet branch master has broken. Please view the build at https://builds.apache.org/job/incubator-mxnet/job/master/603/

[BUILD FAILED] Branch master build 602

Build for MXNet branch master has broken. Please view the build at https://builds.apache.org/job/incubator-mxnet/job/master/602/

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache MXNet(incubating) version 0.12.1.rc0

+1 (binding) verified signature, built from source. On 08.11.2017 04:51, Chris Olivier wrote: +1 Binding On Tue, Nov 7, 2017 at 7:48 PM Meghna Baijal wrote: This is the vote to release Apache MXNet (incubating) version 0.12.1. Voting will start now (Tuesday,

The process for a patch release

Hi All, A patch release is being planned for Apache MXNet(incubating) to include some important bug fixes. I want to confirm that for a patch release, there is no RC and voting step. Effectively the process looks something like this - Step 1: Cherrypick all the necessary bugfixes into the

[BUILD FAILED] Branch master build 597

Build for MXNet branch master has broken. Please view the build at https://builds.apache.org/job/incubator-mxnet/job/master/597/

Re: MXNet Slack channel

Added On 07.11.17, 12:58, "Bay, Daniel" wrote: Requesting an invitation to the MXNet slack channel. Thanks, Daniel

[BUILD FAILED] Branch master build 598

Build for MXNet branch master has broken. Please view the build at https://builds.apache.org/job/incubator-mxnet/job/master/598/

Re: The process for a patch release

Do we need a vote for a critical patch release? On Tue, Nov 7, 2017 at 12:08 PM, Meghna Baijal wrote: > Hi All, > A patch release is being planned for Apache MXNet(incubating) to include > some important bug fixes. > I want to confirm that for a patch release, there

Data Pipeline Intermediate Representation in MXNet/NNVM

Hi, Tensorflow has a transform package https://github.com/tensorflow/transform which is capable of export a data preprocessing pipeline to a tensorflow graph, which can be incorporated into network graph. This package provides a neat way to manage data pipeline together with network graph, since

Re: The process for a patch release

I don’t recall where I heard that. Oh well, no worries. Vote it is. On Tue, Nov 7, 2017 at 5:28 PM Hen wrote: > I thought a patch release was exactly the same as a full release; except > that there is less discussion of the features involved. > > Did you see a more

Re: update build instructions

Hi I updated the build instructions using CMake, python3 and other minor inacuracies in this PR: https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/8578 Please have a look and comment. I also added a file in the root "DEVELOPMENT.md" which synthesizes how to build mxnet and run the unit tests to

Re: Disable 'required status check' for master

Its the failed ones that's the problem. They fail because CI is not working properly. For example this trivial change to doc cannot be merged because CI failed: https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/8555/files On 2017-10-31 13:36, Chris Olivier wrote: > I see

Re: The process for a patch release

Yes. You would just do it quicker (if such was truly needed). You would still need at least 3 +1s, and at the moment there is the crutch that you would also need 3 Incubator PMC +1s (or the first 3 would have to be IPMC). If it's a security vulnerability, then we would use private@ and confer

Re: The process for a patch release

Thank you for the clarification! The security release process certainly makes sense (not to publicly announce security holes). On Tue, Nov 7, 2017 at 9:41 PM Hen wrote: > Yes. You would just do it quicker (if such was truly needed). You would > still need at least 3 +1s, and