Re: [RESULTS] [VOTE] Release Apache MXNet (incubating) version 1.4.1.rc0

2019-05-04 Thread Junru Shao
As Anirudh changes his vote from -1 to 0 in the voting thread just now, the vote results changes to 12 +1 votes (3 binding), 1 0 vote, and no -1 vote. Thank you guys again for your hard work testing the release! I will start a voting thread on general@. Thanks, Junru On Fri, May 3, 2019 at

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache MXNet (incubating) version 1.4.1.rc0

2019-05-04 Thread Junru Shao
Hi Anirudh, Thanks for reporting this! I verified on my EC2 machine for the second time. It perfectly builds with your commands. It is a bit weird...I noticed that there is a subtle difference that my ninja progress bar is like "[xxx/506]", while yours is "[xxx/488]". I am not sure if there is

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache MXNet (incubating) version 1.4.1.rc0

2019-05-04 Thread Junru Shao
Thank you Anirudh for your quick response! I will change the result accordingly :-) On Fri, May 3, 2019 at 11:58 PM Anirudh Subramanian wrote: > No worries, maybe its just something with my setup. > Moving my vote to +0, pending someone else check. > > On Fri, May 3, 2019 at 11:39 PM Junru Shao

[RESULTS] [VOTE] Release Apache MXNet (incubating) version 1.4.1.rc0

2019-05-04 Thread Junru Shao
Dear MXNet community, I'm happy to announce the results of the vote. This vote passes with 12 +1 votes (3 binding), no 0 votes, and 1 -1 vote. +1 votes * Sheng Zha / binding * Qing Lan / binding * Carin Meier / binding * Aaron Markham * Pedro Larroy * Lai Wei * Damien Stanton * Kellen Sunderland

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache MXNet (incubating) version 1.4.1.rc0

2019-05-04 Thread Anirudh Subramanian
No worries, maybe its just something with my setup. Moving my vote to +0, pending someone else check. On Fri, May 3, 2019 at 11:39 PM Junru Shao wrote: > Hi Anirudh, > > Thanks for reporting this! > > I verified on my EC2 machine for the second time. It perfectly builds with > your commands. It

Re: [VOTE] add conan support for Apache MXNet (incubating)

2019-05-04 Thread Sheng Zha
Thank you for the explanation and sorry that I missed the earlier context as it has been a while. While I like the idea of simplifying the dependency management with tools like conan, I have the following concerns on this vote as-is (it's also my take on why I think the PR is stuck): - It's

Re: [VOTE] add conan support for Apache MXNet (incubating)

2019-05-04 Thread Sheng Zha
To be clear, my intention is really to prevent a seemingly good solution to exacerbate the problem that it sets out to solve. This tends to happen when there are not enough people to drive it to the end. If there are additional values in this solution that people feel outweighs the problems