Re: CI and PRs

2019-08-26 Thread Pedro Larroy
Hi Chris, you are reading some confrontational or negative things where there is no bad intention and just diverse opinions and ways to express them. We went with Marco for a beer and dinner together and talked about this and we had a good exchange of technical ideas and opinions with mutual

Re: [Discuss] MXNet Python < 3.6 Support Deprecation

2019-08-26 Thread Pedro Larroy
I have sent a PR that removes Python2 from CI. But was closed. I thought everyone was +1 on this one. This would remove quite a bit of load on CI: https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/15990 If it's not the right time to do this, what steps do we need to take? Pedro. On Mon, Aug 26,

Re: [Discuss] MXNet Python < 3.6 Support Deprecation

2019-08-26 Thread Marco de Abreu
Pedro, thanks for already starting these efforts, but it might be too early for that. Right now, this is a discussion thread where we try to gather different opinions in order to lay a good base for a future voting thread. In there, we would define the detailed timeline, versions etc. Until the

Re: [Discussion] MXNet 1.5.1 release

2019-08-26 Thread Pedro Larroy
There's a fix that I did which seems to still produce crashes in 1.5 for some users, which I got notice today and is fixed in master. Might be useful to put in 1.5.1: https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/15762 ? Pedro. On Tue, Aug 20, 2019 at 7:49 AM Tao Lv wrote: > Hi dev, > >

Re: [Discuss] MXNet Python < 3.6 Support Deprecation

2019-08-26 Thread Leonard Lausen
Lieven Govaerts writes: > Hi, > > On Thu, 22 Aug 2019 at 17:01, Leonard Lausen wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> Pedro stated "Seems 3.6 is a reasonable choice." and there have been a >> few +1 after Chaitanya's reply to Pedro. I would like to check if these >> only refer to Chaitanya's mail about a