One comment to 2: do you have any pointers to this thread? Maybe a request from
a user of the project helps revive that discussion.
Not sure if that helps, but as a bit of background, at least Pieter who
designed the zeromq *community* was fine with mpl iirc:
On Wed, Aug 02, 2017 at 12:27:52AM -0700, Henri Yandell wrote:
> Following up on this - the first 3 reports in a new podling, or a new TLP
> PMC, are made monthly. Then it moves to quarterly.
> So MXNet doesn't have to report monthly again until it graduates.
> The quarterly cycle for MXNet
On Fri, Aug 04, 2017 at 12:42:12AM -0700, Henri Yandell wrote:
> I worry that it creates a high barrier to entry.
+1 from my side to that worry.
I'm currently in the process of creating a slide deck and wanted to use the
mxnet logo as part of that presentation.
So I want ahead and opened
I found a directory listing including a test directory. Is that expected?
Clicking on the "test" directory
On Thu, Aug 10, 2017 at 12:31:23PM -0700, Bhavin Thaker wrote:
> The criteria should look not only at Quantity but at the Quality of work as
Just as one additional data point:
http://community.apache.org/newcommitter.html is the Apache Community
Development Project's guidelines.
On Thu, Jul 13, 2017 at 09:30:33AM +0200, Sebastian Schelter wrote:
> This mail is a little bit off-topic, but I would like to share a story that
> shows how important it is for open source projects to move to their own
> infrastructure (like the one provided by the ASF) and not rely on the
Other projects are using dedicated lists like issues@ for this.
What workflow did you use so far to keep up with what's going on in the project?
Am 28. Juli 2017 22:24:54 MESZ schrieb Dom Divakaruni
>Can we please do this?
>> On Jul 28,
Am 4. August 2017 13:27:16 MESZ schrieb Chiyuan Zhang :
>1. There are some people who contribute to MXNet due to something else
>(e.g. he used MXNet in his project and would like to contribute back
>examples, or bug fix, or new operators, etc.)
Many Apache projects are
On Fri, Aug 04, 2017 at 12:27:16PM +0100, Chiyuan Zhang wrote:
> Suppose we lower the standard or completely remove the formal standard for
> committers, then we could probably be able to get more committers from the
> first type. But that might not necessarily be good to us
Can you elaborate
On Thu, Jun 15, 2017 at 06:49:21AM +0200, Suneel Marthi wrote:
> anyone with apache.org shuld be able to register on slack - Sebastian was
> asking me the same question in Berlin last week.
> Suggest leave the channel open to anyone registering with apache.org email.
Is there a way to make it
First of all, great to read there are people with interest and time to update
Am 12. September 2017 19:00:21 MESZ schrieb Seb Kiureghian :
>The pPMC would like to update the website.
This wording is worrying to me. It sounds like a decision was made out of
Am 16. November 2017 23:04:05 MEZ schrieb "Lupesko, Hagay" :
>Today AWS announced contributing ONNX-MXNet,
Just for clarification: this package is going to be/ intended to be contributed
where to? Or do you mean "published under a free and open source license"?
Just a quick heads-up: we'll have several senior Apache ppl in Berlin on
November 20th for http://fossbackstage.de
The location is two UBahn stops east of the Amazon offices. The event is free
as in free beer. While I will pick up printed batches in an hour you can still
sign up and show
Mail list logo