Nanomsg seems not be active these days. I prefer to have use raw socket for
communication.
One question I have is that, zeromq indicates we can link against zeromq if no
change is made.
I think our situation means this requirement, the only place we used zeromq is
this file: https://github.com
Can we schedule a time on monday to finish the transfer together?
From: Daniel Pono Takamori
Sent: Friday, July 7, 2017 5:22 PM
To: dev@mxnet.incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: MXNet -> Apache Migration proposal
This looks great Ly. On Monday we can transf
LGTM.
The main reason that I switched the default option PR-merge to PR-head is
because we were adding a bunch of new test cases at that time and the whole
system was not very stable. Testing PR-head is easier to locate the errors in
that PR. Then there is an additional PR-merge test after tha
Very good document, thanks!
One issue with approach 1 is that resuming the operator after the failed one
may cause error and even system hang. Say if op A writes var V while op B reads
V. Then B will not be excited if A is failed, unless we clear their
dependencies, but it will lead to wrong r
A general concern is that if we want to include a package under active
developing into MXNet. I saw ONNX made a lot of progress these days, such as
control flow, while none of us participant into it. It worries me that mxnet’s
release may need to be correlated to oonx version. How do other frame
nd
> then version each of them separately to the core of MXNet.
>
> Best regards,
> Marco
>
> Am 23.02.2018 6:54 nachm. schrieb "Li, Mu" :
>
> A general concern is that if we want to include a package under active
> developing into MXNet. I saw ONNX made a l
Hi Team,
We are in trouble attracting new users. According to Google analytics, there is
almost no increase in the number of paper views for the document site mxnet.io.
The number of paper views is an important metric for the adoption, I would like
to take actions to improve this number. It
l as-is with this
> dataset/model.
>
>
> -Chris
>
>
>
>> On Sun, Feb 25, 2018 at 8:34 PM Mu Li wrote:
>>
>> Not sure why the screenshot of the page view is not there, attach it again:
>>
>>
>> Best,
>> Mu
>>
>>>
Hi Pedro,
Do you mean public or private meetup? Simon is organizing a mxnet workshop
during that conference, but only for internal amazon users.
Best,
Mu
> On Feb 28, 2018, at 3:02 PM, Pedro Larroy
> wrote:
>
> Hi folks
>
> It would be nice to organize an MXNet community meet up in Seattl
Is there a way to release a MXNet-gpu instead of one for each CUDA version? And
we can delete some old daily builds (move to our s3 bucket rather than pypi’s )
Best
Mu
> On Sep 9, 2018, at 10:56 AM, kellen sunderland
> wrote:
>
> Hello MXNet devs,
>
> Recently a PyPi maintainer raised a conc
Awesome job! That’s a great benefit to CPU users
Best
Mu
> On Jan 11, 2019, at 6:59 PM, Zhao, Patric wrote:
>
> Dear all,
>
> I am pleased to announce that the MKLDNN is the default CPU backend in the
> master branch for the Linux platform now.
> (note: the nightly build and release doesn't
11 matches
Mail list logo
