Re: Horovod-MXNet Integration

Congrats on the Horovod integration everyone. That's really great to hear. On Wed, Jan 30, 2019 at 10:08 AM Lin Yuan wrote: > > Hi Yuan, > > Thanks for your interest. We have just supported MXNet in Horovod and are > working on performance tuning and adding more examples. We are definitely > inte

Re: Horovod-MXNet Integration

Hi Yuan, Thanks for your interest. We have just supported MXNet in Horovod and are working on performance tuning and adding more examples. We are definitely interested in further extending it's support with Kubeflow. Let's set up some time to have a more detailed discussion. Best, Lin On Wed,

Re: Horovod-MXNet Integration

Hi, It's great to see MXNet-Horovod integration got merged: https://github.com/uber/horovod/pull/542 Is there any future plan for this? I've been working on Kubeflow's MPI-Operator (https://github.com/kubeflow/mpi-operator) lately and it would be interesting to see an example of using Horovod + M

Re: Horovod-MXNet Integration

Hi Mu, Darren (@yuxihu ) and I have been working on releasing MXNet-Horovod integration in production. We have made some changes on both MXNet and Horovod sides. The changes on MXNet side have mostly been merged and we are working to merge code to horovod repo. We will s

Re: Horovod-MXNet Integration

Thanks for your contribution, Carl. I remember I left a comment on the proposal, but today I found it was disappeared. My suggestion is trying best to not change the existing API. The reason is that we need to change all trainers on the frontend that uses the existing kvstore APIs, which may cause