Re: ICLAs?

2018-07-13 Thread Marco de Abreu
Hi,

I just wanted to clarify my previous statement: We don't have a system in
place where we collect ICLAs from every contributor who creates a pull
request before we accept and merge it. I have seen other projects having a
bot that serves this purpose and labels the pull requests accordingly, but
we are currently not tracking these efforts as part of the merging process.

-Marco

Steffen Rochel  schrieb am Fr., 13. Juli 2018,
20:48:

> Hi Sergio - please see previous thread on the topic here
> <
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/236c53f4620721cd712f364eafd0f19b829b9fc38db2794979500aae@%3Cdev.mxnet.apache.org%3E
> >
> .
>
> Please see below the list of handles still missing ICLA (to best of my
> knowledge), but nobody on the list is a committer.
> sneakerkg
> kevinthesun
> hjk41
> mavenlin
> tornadomeet
> winstywang
> qiaohaijun
> vchuravy
> howard0su
> sbodenstein
> ptrendx
>
> Steffen
>
> On Thu, Jul 12, 2018 at 10:13 AM Marco de Abreu
>  wrote:
>
> > Hi Sergio,
> >
> > we are only collecting ICLAs from people if they become a committer.
> > Otherwise, we don't request any.
> >
> > -Marco
> >
> > On Thu, Jul 12, 2018 at 8:07 PM Sergio Fernández 
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > one detail I've notices: is the Podling collecting all ICLA when people
> > > contribute to the project?
> > >
> > > I can' find traces for most of the folks in this list:
> > >
> > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/blob/master/CONTRIBUTORS.md
> > >
> > > Because that's a minor, but important, detail for the viability of the
> > > project.
> > >
> > > Cheers,
> > >
> >
>


Re: ICLAs?

2018-07-13 Thread Steffen Rochel
Hi Sergio - please see previous thread on the topic here

.

Please see below the list of handles still missing ICLA (to best of my
knowledge), but nobody on the list is a committer.
sneakerkg
kevinthesun
hjk41
mavenlin
tornadomeet
winstywang
qiaohaijun
vchuravy
howard0su
sbodenstein
ptrendx

Steffen

On Thu, Jul 12, 2018 at 10:13 AM Marco de Abreu
 wrote:

> Hi Sergio,
>
> we are only collecting ICLAs from people if they become a committer.
> Otherwise, we don't request any.
>
> -Marco
>
> On Thu, Jul 12, 2018 at 8:07 PM Sergio Fernández 
> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > one detail I've notices: is the Podling collecting all ICLA when people
> > contribute to the project?
> >
> > I can' find traces for most of the folks in this list:
> >
> > https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/blob/master/CONTRIBUTORS.md
> >
> > Because that's a minor, but important, detail for the viability of the
> > project.
> >
> > Cheers,
> >
>


Re: ICLAs?

2018-07-12 Thread Marco de Abreu
Hi Sergio,

we are only collecting ICLAs from people if they become a committer.
Otherwise, we don't request any.

-Marco

On Thu, Jul 12, 2018 at 8:07 PM Sergio Fernández  wrote:

> Hi,
>
> one detail I've notices: is the Podling collecting all ICLA when people
> contribute to the project?
>
> I can' find traces for most of the folks in this list:
>
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/blob/master/CONTRIBUTORS.md
>
> Because that's a minor, but important, detail for the viability of the
> project.
>
> Cheers,
>


Re: ICLAs vs Contributors

2017-09-06 Thread Henri Yandell
Hi Przemyslaw,

We need each of you to sign an ICLA (
https://www.apache.org/licenses/icla.pdf ). That will cover your
contributions, including future contributions.

If you'd like to only sign something for only past contributions (ie: not
looking to make future contributions), then having you sign an SGA would be
an alternative to an ICLA (
https://www.apache.org/licenses/software-grant.txt ).

Whether or not you should sign a CCLA is up to NVIDIA. Apache does not
require that corporations sign the CCLA, but some corporations choose to
sign a CCLA (for example if they feel that their employees are unable to
sign an ICLA without the corporation also signing something).

You can keep contributing (sending pull requests) before signing. Signing
this helps to strengthen MXNet's provenance (aka proof that the code is
legally authentic). There's already proof that the code is legally
authentic (some examples: you opening pull requests, the Apache license
requiring you to identify if the contribution is not under Apache license,
GitHub terms of service), this strengthens it :)

Many thanks for doing this,

Hen



On Wed, Sep 6, 2017 at 10:25 AM, Chris Olivier 
wrote:

> I think individual (personal email addresses), which is how everyone else
> is doing it, as far as I know
>
> On Wed, Sep 6, 2017 at 3:20 AM, ptre...@gmail.com 
> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > Me (ptrendx on GitHub), Dick (DickJC123) and Marek (mkolod) are NVIDIA
> > employees working on MXNet. Should we sign individual CLAs or should
> NVIDIA
> > sign corporate CLA with ASF? If so, could you point us to the document
> that
> > needs to be signed? Can we contribute in the meantime?
> >
> > Thank you
> > Przemyslaw Tredak
> >
> > On 2017-09-01 12:28, Henri Yandell  wrote:
> > > I've listed the top 100 contributors (as of the other day) on GitHub
> > here:
> > >
> > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MXNET/ICLA+Progress
> > >
> > > With a check if they have signed an ICLA.
> > >
> > > John/Justin - can you confirm that we don't have to get an ICLA signed
> > from
> > > someone whose significant contributions have only been since MXNet came
> > to
> > > Apache? (Assuming it's not such a large piece of work that would flag
> for
> > > software-grant/ICLA - a new component etc).
> > >
> > > --
> > >
> > > I'd like us (MXNet) to work our way down the list getting (up to
> > > yanqingmen) ICLAs signed. After that we will review the nature of the
> > next
> > > batch of contributors commits and determine how much more ICLA signing
> we
> > > need.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > >
> > > Hen
> > >
> > >
> > > On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 10:06 PM, Henri Yandell 
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > > (cc to John and Justin as they'd asked about this)
> > > >
> > > > Looking at the current MXNet GitHub contributors list (411
> > contributors):
> > > >
> > > > We have 36 signed CLAs at this point.
> > > >
> > > > Of the top 36 contributors, the following 15 top contributors aren't
> > > > covered by a CLA:
> > > >
> > > > 8:sneakerkg
> > > > 9:kevinthesun  (post Incubation)
> > > > 17:hjk41
> > > > 18:mavenlin
> > > > 19:tornadomeet
> > > > 20:winstywang
> > > > 21:jermainewang
> > > > 22:qiaohaijun
> > > > 23:vchuravy
> > > > 25:Roshrini  (post Incubation)
> > > > 26:howard0su
> > > > 28:sbodenstein
> > > > 31:ptrendx  (post Incubation)
> > > > 35:zackchase   (post Incubation)
> > > > 36:yanqingmen
> > > >
> > > > Note that some of these are post entering the Incubator.
> > > >
> > > > Some of the 411 contributors we should ask for CLA/SGs from. Those
> > above
> > > > are most likely the first to get agreements signed from, and we need
> to
> > > > determine how far down the list to go.
> > > >
> > > > The git logs are trickier to use as they don't use the github login;
> so
> > > > doing an analysis of the diffs themselves is trickier.
> > > >
> > > > Hen
> > > >
> > >
> >
>


Re: ICLAs vs Contributors

2017-09-06 Thread Chris Olivier
I think individual (personal email addresses), which is how everyone else
is doing it, as far as I know

On Wed, Sep 6, 2017 at 3:20 AM, ptre...@gmail.com  wrote:

> Hi,
>
> Me (ptrendx on GitHub), Dick (DickJC123) and Marek (mkolod) are NVIDIA
> employees working on MXNet. Should we sign individual CLAs or should NVIDIA
> sign corporate CLA with ASF? If so, could you point us to the document that
> needs to be signed? Can we contribute in the meantime?
>
> Thank you
> Przemyslaw Tredak
>
> On 2017-09-01 12:28, Henri Yandell  wrote:
> > I've listed the top 100 contributors (as of the other day) on GitHub
> here:
> >
> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MXNET/ICLA+Progress
> >
> > With a check if they have signed an ICLA.
> >
> > John/Justin - can you confirm that we don't have to get an ICLA signed
> from
> > someone whose significant contributions have only been since MXNet came
> to
> > Apache? (Assuming it's not such a large piece of work that would flag for
> > software-grant/ICLA - a new component etc).
> >
> > --
> >
> > I'd like us (MXNet) to work our way down the list getting (up to
> > yanqingmen) ICLAs signed. After that we will review the nature of the
> next
> > batch of contributors commits and determine how much more ICLA signing we
> > need.
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Hen
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 10:06 PM, Henri Yandell 
> wrote:
> >
> > > (cc to John and Justin as they'd asked about this)
> > >
> > > Looking at the current MXNet GitHub contributors list (411
> contributors):
> > >
> > > We have 36 signed CLAs at this point.
> > >
> > > Of the top 36 contributors, the following 15 top contributors aren't
> > > covered by a CLA:
> > >
> > > 8:sneakerkg
> > > 9:kevinthesun  (post Incubation)
> > > 17:hjk41
> > > 18:mavenlin
> > > 19:tornadomeet
> > > 20:winstywang
> > > 21:jermainewang
> > > 22:qiaohaijun
> > > 23:vchuravy
> > > 25:Roshrini  (post Incubation)
> > > 26:howard0su
> > > 28:sbodenstein
> > > 31:ptrendx  (post Incubation)
> > > 35:zackchase   (post Incubation)
> > > 36:yanqingmen
> > >
> > > Note that some of these are post entering the Incubator.
> > >
> > > Some of the 411 contributors we should ask for CLA/SGs from. Those
> above
> > > are most likely the first to get agreements signed from, and we need to
> > > determine how far down the list to go.
> > >
> > > The git logs are trickier to use as they don't use the github login; so
> > > doing an analysis of the diffs themselves is trickier.
> > >
> > > Hen
> > >
> >
>


Re: ICLAs vs Contributors

2017-09-06 Thread ptre...@gmail.com
Hi,

Me (ptrendx on GitHub), Dick (DickJC123) and Marek (mkolod) are NVIDIA 
employees working on MXNet. Should we sign individual CLAs or should NVIDIA 
sign corporate CLA with ASF? If so, could you point us to the document that 
needs to be signed? Can we contribute in the meantime?

Thank you
Przemyslaw Tredak

On 2017-09-01 12:28, Henri Yandell  wrote: 
> I've listed the top 100 contributors (as of the other day) on GitHub here:
> 
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MXNET/ICLA+Progress
> 
> With a check if they have signed an ICLA.
> 
> John/Justin - can you confirm that we don't have to get an ICLA signed from
> someone whose significant contributions have only been since MXNet came to
> Apache? (Assuming it's not such a large piece of work that would flag for
> software-grant/ICLA - a new component etc).
> 
> --
> 
> I'd like us (MXNet) to work our way down the list getting (up to
> yanqingmen) ICLAs signed. After that we will review the nature of the next
> batch of contributors commits and determine how much more ICLA signing we
> need.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Hen
> 
> 
> On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 10:06 PM, Henri Yandell  wrote:
> 
> > (cc to John and Justin as they'd asked about this)
> >
> > Looking at the current MXNet GitHub contributors list (411 contributors):
> >
> > We have 36 signed CLAs at this point.
> >
> > Of the top 36 contributors, the following 15 top contributors aren't
> > covered by a CLA:
> >
> > 8:sneakerkg
> > 9:kevinthesun  (post Incubation)
> > 17:hjk41
> > 18:mavenlin
> > 19:tornadomeet
> > 20:winstywang
> > 21:jermainewang
> > 22:qiaohaijun
> > 23:vchuravy
> > 25:Roshrini  (post Incubation)
> > 26:howard0su
> > 28:sbodenstein
> > 31:ptrendx  (post Incubation)
> > 35:zackchase   (post Incubation)
> > 36:yanqingmen
> >
> > Note that some of these are post entering the Incubator.
> >
> > Some of the 411 contributors we should ask for CLA/SGs from. Those above
> > are most likely the first to get agreements signed from, and we need to
> > determine how far down the list to go.
> >
> > The git logs are trickier to use as they don't use the github login; so
> > doing an analysis of the diffs themselves is trickier.
> >
> > Hen
> >
> 


Re: ICLAs vs Contributors

2017-09-01 Thread Henri Yandell
Hi tornadomeet :)

If you could sign this (ink, not typed) and email it to secret...@apache.org
that would be brilliant.

Thanks,

Hen


On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 9:19 AM, tornadomeet <1530735...@qq.com> wrote:

> hello, i'm tornadomeet, how to sign CLAs?
>
>
> thanks
>
>
> -- 原始邮件 --
> 发件人: "Henri Yandell";;
> 发送时间: 2017年8月30日(星期三) 中午1:06
> 收件人: "dev"; "John D. Ament"<
> johndam...@apache.org>; "Justin Mclean";
>
> 主题: ICLAs vs Contributors
>
>
>
> (cc to John and Justin as they'd asked about this)
>
> Looking at the current MXNet GitHub contributors list (411 contributors):
>
> We have 36 signed CLAs at this point.
>
> Of the top 36 contributors, the following 15 top contributors aren't
> covered by a CLA:
>
> 8:sneakerkg
> 9:kevinthesun  (post Incubation)
> 17:hjk41
> 18:mavenlin
> 19:tornadomeet
> 20:winstywang
> 21:jermainewang
> 22:qiaohaijun
> 23:vchuravy
> 25:Roshrini  (post Incubation)
> 26:howard0su
> 28:sbodenstein
> 31:ptrendx  (post Incubation)
> 35:zackchase   (post Incubation)
> 36:yanqingmen
>
> Note that some of these are post entering the Incubator.
>
> Some of the 411 contributors we should ask for CLA/SGs from. Those above
> are most likely the first to get agreements signed from, and we need to
> determine how far down the list to go.
>
> The git logs are trickier to use as they don't use the github login; so
> doing an analysis of the diffs themselves is trickier.
>
> Hen
>


Re: ICLAs vs Contributors

2017-08-30 Thread shiwen hu
yes.nobody tell them.

2017-08-30 14:43 GMT+08:00 Henri Yandell :

> They're not committers, so I doubt anyone has requested they sign a ICLA.
> Looking at the GitHub history, some haven't been active in a while.
>
> Hen
>
> On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 11:07 PM, shiwen hu  wrote:
>
> > Maybe they don't know how to start the ICLA process.Consider creating a
> > boot page.
> >
> > 2017-08-30 13:06 GMT+08:00 Henri Yandell :
> >
> > > (cc to John and Justin as they'd asked about this)
> > >
> > > Looking at the current MXNet GitHub contributors list (411
> contributors):
> > >
> > > We have 36 signed CLAs at this point.
> > >
> > > Of the top 36 contributors, the following 15 top contributors aren't
> > > covered by a CLA:
> > >
> > > 8:sneakerkg
> > > 9:kevinthesun  (post Incubation)
> > > 17:hjk41
> > > 18:mavenlin
> > > 19:tornadomeet
> > > 20:winstywang
> > > 21:jermainewang
> > > 22:qiaohaijun
> > > 23:vchuravy
> > > 25:Roshrini  (post Incubation)
> > > 26:howard0su
> > > 28:sbodenstein
> > > 31:ptrendx  (post Incubation)
> > > 35:zackchase   (post Incubation)
> > > 36:yanqingmen
> > >
> > > Note that some of these are post entering the Incubator.
> > >
> > > Some of the 411 contributors we should ask for CLA/SGs from. Those
> above
> > > are most likely the first to get agreements signed from, and we need to
> > > determine how far down the list to go.
> > >
> > > The git logs are trickier to use as they don't use the github login; so
> > > doing an analysis of the diffs themselves is trickier.
> > >
> > > Hen
> > >
> >
>


Re: ICLAs vs Contributors

2017-08-30 Thread Henri Yandell
They're not committers, so I doubt anyone has requested they sign a ICLA.
Looking at the GitHub history, some haven't been active in a while.

Hen

On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 11:07 PM, shiwen hu  wrote:

> Maybe they don't know how to start the ICLA process.Consider creating a
> boot page.
>
> 2017-08-30 13:06 GMT+08:00 Henri Yandell :
>
> > (cc to John and Justin as they'd asked about this)
> >
> > Looking at the current MXNet GitHub contributors list (411 contributors):
> >
> > We have 36 signed CLAs at this point.
> >
> > Of the top 36 contributors, the following 15 top contributors aren't
> > covered by a CLA:
> >
> > 8:sneakerkg
> > 9:kevinthesun  (post Incubation)
> > 17:hjk41
> > 18:mavenlin
> > 19:tornadomeet
> > 20:winstywang
> > 21:jermainewang
> > 22:qiaohaijun
> > 23:vchuravy
> > 25:Roshrini  (post Incubation)
> > 26:howard0su
> > 28:sbodenstein
> > 31:ptrendx  (post Incubation)
> > 35:zackchase   (post Incubation)
> > 36:yanqingmen
> >
> > Note that some of these are post entering the Incubator.
> >
> > Some of the 411 contributors we should ask for CLA/SGs from. Those above
> > are most likely the first to get agreements signed from, and we need to
> > determine how far down the list to go.
> >
> > The git logs are trickier to use as they don't use the github login; so
> > doing an analysis of the diffs themselves is trickier.
> >
> > Hen
> >
>


Re: ICLAs vs Contributors

2017-08-30 Thread shiwen hu
Maybe they don't know how to start the ICLA process.Consider creating a
boot page.

2017-08-30 13:06 GMT+08:00 Henri Yandell :

> (cc to John and Justin as they'd asked about this)
>
> Looking at the current MXNet GitHub contributors list (411 contributors):
>
> We have 36 signed CLAs at this point.
>
> Of the top 36 contributors, the following 15 top contributors aren't
> covered by a CLA:
>
> 8:sneakerkg
> 9:kevinthesun  (post Incubation)
> 17:hjk41
> 18:mavenlin
> 19:tornadomeet
> 20:winstywang
> 21:jermainewang
> 22:qiaohaijun
> 23:vchuravy
> 25:Roshrini  (post Incubation)
> 26:howard0su
> 28:sbodenstein
> 31:ptrendx  (post Incubation)
> 35:zackchase   (post Incubation)
> 36:yanqingmen
>
> Note that some of these are post entering the Incubator.
>
> Some of the 411 contributors we should ask for CLA/SGs from. Those above
> are most likely the first to get agreements signed from, and we need to
> determine how far down the list to go.
>
> The git logs are trickier to use as they don't use the github login; so
> doing an analysis of the diffs themselves is trickier.
>
> Hen
>