Re: MXNet CD pipelines cost savings

2020-02-14 Thread Marco de Abreu
Excellent, thanks a lot for your efforts, sheng! -Marco Sheng Zha schrieb am Mi., 12. Feb. 2020, 22:57: > Hi Marco, > > I've taken up the task to fix the CD pipeline [1] and it's pending CI > checks and merge. I also made the adjustments to the namespace layout of > the mxnet s3 bucket and

Re: MXNet CD pipelines cost savings

2020-02-12 Thread Sheng Zha
Hi Marco, I've taken up the task to fix the CD pipeline [1] and it's pending CI checks and merge. I also made the adjustments to the namespace layout of the mxnet s3 bucket and updated the static page which is now accessible from https://repo.mxnet.io/dist/index.html. Meanwhile, the access

Re: MXNet CD pipelines cost savings

2020-02-10 Thread Marco de Abreu
Thanks for bringing this to our attention. I'm quite devastated that our two vetoes have been ignored and the CodeBuild pipeline is actually supplying our user-facing binaries. Suggesting to turn of the Jenkins based CD now adds insult to injury. I'd like to hear a plan how to make the project

Re: MXNet CD pipelines cost savings

2020-02-10 Thread Zha, Sheng
+dev@ -sz On Feb 10, 2020, at 1:35 PM, Zha, Sheng wrote:  As already stated in the public threads, I’ve vetoed the CodeBuild solution from becoming the long term solution as it’s not publicly manageable. As communicated before, the team should have put efforts in maintaining and fixing the