Speed isn't everything. It's the only thing. :)
On Thu, Feb 15, 2018 at 3:52 AM, Pedro Larroy
wrote:
> I don't know about the speed, and it shouldn't be the only criteria to
> do things. My main question is: Why Cython instead of C++, is there
> data or a prototype that would show light into wh
I don't know about the speed, and it shouldn't be the only criteria to
do things. My main question is: Why Cython instead of C++, is there
data or a prototype that would show light into what is the best
decision here?
Regarding the bindings, as with boost::python seems it's a very thin
wrapper ove
*I don't see in pybind11 that it's claiming to be especially performant,
only that it's convenient in passing data back and forth.*
*Is it claimed somewhere that it is especially fast?*
On Wed, Feb 14, 2018 at 10:45 AM, Pedro Larroy wrote:
> Why Cython and not just C++ with simple python bindin
Why Cython and not just C++ with simple python bindings like
https://github.com/pybind/pybind11 ? What's the motivation?
Have we considered the trade offs between maintainability, speed and
tooling? Also this Cython code is not going to be portable as it would
be in C++, and has some learning curv
