[Trinidad] added optgroup support

I recognized that the XHTML renderers for tr:selectOneListbox and tr:selectManyListbox don't support the optgroup-Tag (compared to the equivalent standard components). So I implemented a conceptional solution. At the moment HTML doesn't support nested optgroup-Tags (within optgroup-Tags).

[Trinidad] open issues

hello, i've provided some patches for trinidad. is there already a planned version for these patches? furthermore, there is an open issue i would like to discuss. (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-782) regards, gerhard -- http://www.irian.at Your JSF powerhouse - JSF

Re: [Trinidad] open issues

] wrote: Glad you pointed that out. my goal for the patch day is: -apply Trinidad patches -apply MyFaces 1.2 patches (did some already yestrday) I'll take a look at yours! -Matthias On Nov 24, 2007 1:49 PM, Gerhard Petracek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: hello, i've provided

Re: [Trinidad] open issues

hello matthias, today i opened a new issue and provided a patch - a new link for my previous list: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-841 regards, gerhard 2007/11/24, Gerhard Petracek [EMAIL PROTECTED]: hello matthias, that's great! for the mentioned issue there is no patch

Re: [Trinidad] open issues

hello matthias, today i opened a new issue and provided a patch - a new link for my previous list: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-842 regards, gerhard @: the text of the mail is nearly the same again - however, it's really a new issue :) 2007/11/27, Gerhard Petracek [EMAIL

Re: MyFaces logo

cool logos! i agree with richard - the first row indicates something neg. (because of the shape of the second face) it's like the 10:10 marketing effect of analogue watches - normally all analogue watches in advertisements display 10:10 - a watch shows a smiling face - pos. vibes... :) (-

Re: Portlet Bridge logo

hello, these logos are very cool! i also prefer the logos on the left hand side. (in my opinion they have a better angle) #5 caught my eyes first! (the shapes and colors are really homogeneous) regards, gerhard 2007/12/7, Michael Freedman [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Thanks for adding the extra

Re: [Trinidad] open issues

hello matthias, improved patch available: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-812 regards, gerhard 2007/11/28, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED]: saw it. will take care soon. -M On Nov 28, 2007 2:13 PM, Gerhard Petracek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: hello matthias

Re: [Build-Tools] Archetypes ?

hello, at the moment the myfaces archetype creates myfaces 1.2.x projects. what do you think about the possibility to generate myfaces 1.1.x projects as well? regards, gerhard 2007/12/20, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED]: relocated to:

Re: [Build-Tools] Archetypes ?

for it; JSF 1.2 is the major version, so it is fine. I am planing to update the Trinidad archetype as well. If there is really a need for a JSF 1.1 version, not a big deal to update the maven-pom-file. -M On Jan 7, 2008 8:53 PM, Gerhard Petracek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: hello

Re: [Build-Tools] Archetypes ?

i've updated the wiki. regards, gerhard 2008/1/8, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED]: yeah, we can put the new pom on the wiki as well -M On Jan 8, 2008 12:36 AM, Gerhard Petracek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: hello matthias, i'm also fine with your suggestion. i agree

Re: [COMMUNITY] MyFaces += Bernhard Huemer

welcome bernhard! regards, gerhard 2008/1/29, Leonardo Uribe [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Welcome! -- http://www.irian.at Your JSF powerhouse - JSF Consulting, Development and Courses in English and German Professional Support for Apache MyFaces

TRINIDAD-935

hello, is someone able to provide a quick answer (see [1])? (before i'll have a look at it.) regards, gerhard [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-935 -- http://www.irian.at Your JSF powerhouse - JSF Consulting, Development and Courses in English and German Professional

Re: [Trinidad] lightweight dialog - JS error

hello matthias, except the following issues: - constant page refreshes and no dialog (opera) - 8 sec. locking (timeout) after closing the dialog (firefox) - wrong blocked area size (all browsers) [1] - dialog-positioning (ie) i'm not aware of further lightweight dialog issues at the moment.

Re: [Trinidad] How to build from svn?

hello stephen, please check out the trunk ([1] or [2]) if mvn clean install doesn't work, please try: mvn package -Dtest=skip mvn install (within the trinidad root-folder) regards, gerhard [1] http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/myfaces/trinidad/trunk [2]

Re: [Trinidad] How to build from svn?

, 2008 6:15 PM, Gerhard Petracek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: hello stephen, please check out the trunk ([1] or [2]) if mvn clean install doesn't work, please try: mvn package -Dtest=skip mvn install (within the trinidad root-folder) regards, gerhard [1] http

Re: TRINIDAD-935

it's ready for testing. if there are any problems we can use the first patch. regards, gerhard 2008/2/7, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Not tested it: If removing it doesn't break existing apps, I think removing is OK -M On Feb 6, 2008 10:16 PM, Gerhard Petracek [EMAIL

TRINIDAD-782

hello, if there are no dissenting votes, i'll commit the solution next week. regards, gerhard -- http://www.irian.at Your JSF powerhouse - JSF Consulting, Development and Courses in English and German Professional Support for Apache MyFaces

TRINIDAD-909 and TRINIDAD-910

hello, before i'll commit the patch of TRINIDAD-909: are there any suggestions concerning TRINIDAD-910? (TRINIDAD-909 also improves the current situation of TRINIDAD-910. however, there is still room for improvement.) regards, gerhard -- http://www.irian.at Your JSF powerhouse - JSF

TRINIDAD-996

hello, before i'll commit the patch of TRINIDAD-996: are there any further suggestions? it's an alternative mechanism (- no replacement). (you have to activate it explicitly with a context-param.) regards, gerhard -- http://www.irian.at Your JSF powerhouse - JSF Consulting, Development

Re: TRINIDAD-996

attribute then -1. I don't think we should start using the id for this sort of thing. Thanks, Gabrielle Gerhard Petracek wrote: hello, before i'll commit the patch of TRINIDAD-996: are there any further suggestions? it's an alternative mechanism (- no replacement). (you have

Re: TRINIDAD-996

: Gerhard Petracek wrote: hello gabrielle, thank you for joining the discussion! :-) as i said: it isn't a replacement of the current mechanism! it's just an additional/alternative approach and you are free to activate it within the web.xml - including all advantages and disadvantages

Re: TRINIDAD-996

need to 1] define your use cases with specific examples, saying different types of focus handling is vague. 2] come up with a new approach that we can agree on. Thanks, Gabrielle Gerhard Petracek wrote: hello blake, i completely agree. as i said (see [1]): it's

Re: New logos for Tobago and Orchestra

hello adonis, they are really nice! regards, gerhard 2008/3/31, Adonis Raduca [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Hi, I wasn't in my best creative disposition in the last period, so I made two logos for Trinidad :) What's your opinion ... about those logos ? Mathias what do you think ? :) Bye

[proposal] jsf validation with annotations

sev-en is a new jsf-extension. sev-en allows jsf validation with annotations! some central features: - cross-component validation (including cross-entity validation) - support for jpa based validation - zero configuration - extensible (e.g. custom annotations) you will find some previews

Re: [proposal] jsf validation with annotations

hello mario, at the moment it's not available at a public repository. my current plan is to publish it within the next view weeks. i agree with you - sev-en would be a great myfaces module! regards, gerhard 2008/4/4, Mario Ivankovits [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Hi! sev-en is a new jsf-extension.

Re: [proposal] jsf validation with annotations

-own.html 2008/4/4, Martin Haimberger [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Hi Gerhard, sounds fancy and simple! Nice work! I think i will take a closer look. How stable is it in the mean time? Regards, Martin On 4/3/08, Gerhard Petracek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: sev-en is a new jsf-extension. sev

Re: [proposal] jsf validation with annotations

hello mario, today i uploaded an intermediate result of the demo. all information are available at the sev-en section of my blog [1]. regards, gerhard [1] http://os890.blogspot.com/search/label/sev-en 2008/4/4, Mario Ivankovits [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Hi! sev-en is a new jsf-extension.

Re: [proposal] jsf validation with annotations

hello leonardo, you don't need trinidad - i used it just for the demo! you will find the requirements at my blog [1] ;) regards, gerhard [1] http://os890.blogspot.com/2008/04/sev-en-framework-requirements.html 2008/4/4, Leonardo Uribe [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Hi I have run the example on my

Re: [proposal] jsf validation with annotations

hello leonardo, once again (as mentioned within my blog): the core of sev-en is independent of specific annotations. - if you would like to have the mentioned annotation - implement and provide it. ;) you will find a short description at my blog [1] as you see within the demo: validators within

Re: [proposal] jsf validation with annotations

hello leonardo, that's right - because of the fact you are using annotations ;) regards, gerhard 2008/4/4, Leonardo Uribe [EMAIL PROTECTED]: On Fri, Apr 4, 2008 at 10:48 AM, Gerhard Petracek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: hello leonardo, you don't need trinidad - i used it just

Re: [proposal] jsf validation with annotations

of yet another project. On Fri, Apr 4, 2008 at 4:45 AM, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, On Thu, Apr 3, 2008 at 10:11 PM, Gerhard Petracek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: sev-en is a new jsf-extension. sev-en allows jsf validation with annotations! some

Re: [proposal] jsf validation with annotations

could want to use this only). Maybe myfaces-commons-sev-en. regards Leonardo Uribe On Fri, Apr 4, 2008 at 11:02 AM, Gerhard Petracek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: hello andrew, sev-en is completely independent of orchestra or the idea behind it. regards, gerhard 2008/4/4

Re: [proposal] jsf validation with annotations

hello leonardo, that's ok! :) it's great to have these discussions. regards, gerhard 2008/4/4, Leonardo Uribe [EMAIL PROTECTED]: On Fri, Apr 4, 2008 at 11:56 AM, Gerhard Petracek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: hello leonardo, concerning myfaces-commons-sev-en: i don't agree. it's

Re: [proposal] jsf validation with annotations

/ - JavaServer Faces FAQ, news, and info phone: +1 203-653-2989 fax: +1 203-653-2988 *From:* Gerhard Petracek [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *Sent:* Friday, April 04, 2008 12:56 PM *To:* MyFaces Development *Subject:* Re: [proposal] jsf validation with annotations hello leonardo, concerning myfaces

Re: [proposal] jsf validation with annotations

-implement-your-own.html 2008/4/4, Kito D. Mann [EMAIL PROTECTED]: *From:* Gerhard Petracek [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *Sent:* Friday, April 04, 2008 2:47 PM *To:* MyFaces Development; [EMAIL PROTECTED] *Subject:* Re: [proposal] jsf validation with annotations hello kito, you can put every

Re: [proposal] jsf validation with annotations

a seperate project, I've no problem if it gets merged in Orchestra, just my 2 cents, it's up to further discussion. Cagatay On Fri, Apr 4, 2008 at 9:57 PM, Kito D. Mann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: *From:* Gerhard Petracek [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *Sent:* Friday, April 04, 2008 2:47 PM

Re: [proposal] jsf validation with annotations

. On Sat, Apr 5, 2008 at 2:02 PM, Gerhard Petracek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: hello cagatay, i see your point. however, i don't agree. to keep it short: i don't like the idea to restrict sev-en to orchestra. don't get me wrong - orchestra is really great! however, it isn't alone

Re: [proposal] jsf validation with annotations

hello, as mentioned: sev-en started as feasibility study. so there are some topics i haven't cared about so far. to keep it short: i would like to finish some tasks before we discuss details. it's much more efficient to discuss the intermediate result after this process. (at the moment the

Re: [proposal] jsf validation with annotations

ok - i'll upload it within the next view days. regards, gerhard 2008/4/11, Martin Marinschek [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Hi Gerhard, let's start a vote _after_ we have discussed the code - just give us a link to a zip-file with the code in it somewhere. regards, Martin On 4/11/08, Gerhard

Re: [proposal] jsf validation with annotations

ok - i'll upload it within the next few days. should i also provide a list with the main todo's? regards, gerhard 2008/4/11, Gerhard Petracek [EMAIL PROTECTED]: ok - i'll upload it within the next view days. regards, gerhard 2008/4/11, Martin Marinschek [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Hi

Re: [proposal] jsf validation with annotations

think about the mentioned vote? regards, gerhard [1] http://people.apache.org/~gpetracek/sev-en_preview.html 2008/4/11, Gerhard Petracek [EMAIL PROTECTED]: ok - i'll upload it within the next few days. should i also provide a list with the main todo's? regards, gerhard 2008/4/11

Re: [Trinidad] Many broken links in Trinidad site

hello andrew, that's a known issue. internally i reported it some month ago. few weeks later carsten discovered the same problem [1]. i asked him to file an issue [2]. regards, gerhard [1]

[VOTE] sev-en as a new myfaces sub-project

hello, as requested i published the source code of the sev-en preview some days ago (details at: [1]). we discussed whether or not we should start a new myfaces sub-project. so let's vote! (there will be a separated discussion + vote concerning the name.)

Re: [VOTE] sev-en as a new myfaces sub-project

+1 regards, gerhard 2008/4/20, Gerhard Petracek [EMAIL PROTECTED]: hello, as requested i published the source code of the sev-en preview some days ago (details at: [1]). we discussed whether or not we should start a new myfaces sub-project. so let's vote! (there will be a separated

Re: [VOTE] sev-en as a new myfaces sub-project

in there. Think about that, I think orchestra might be the perfect place for things like sev-en and/or aspect-el Werner Gerhard Petracek schrieb: hello, as requested i published the source code of the sev-en preview some days ago (details at: [1]). we discussed whether or not we should

Re: [VOTE] sev-en as a new myfaces sub-project

hello werner, ok - great! regards, gerhard 2008/4/20, Werner Punz [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Ok Gerhard my apologies then if all of this is discussed out then a clear +1 from my side. Werner Gerhard Petracek schrieb: hello werner, thank you for your additional hint. however, we

Re: [VOTE] sev-en as a new myfaces sub-project

, Cagatay On Sun, Apr 20, 2008 at 10:45 PM, Gerhard Petracek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: hello cagatay, in the near future i'll think about client side validation support. - does this change your opinion? regards, gerhard 2008/4/20, Cagatay Civici [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Hi

Re: [VOTE] sev-en as a new myfaces sub-project

, Apr 20, 2008 at 10:07 PM, Werner Punz [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Ok Gerhard my apologies then if all of this is discussed out then a clear +1 from my side. Werner Gerhard Petracek schrieb: hello werner

new name for sev-en

hello, 'sev-en' is just the intermediate (code-)name - let's find a final name. there will be some modules within commons-[new name] (which means several jar files). e.g.: required to use sev-en: commons-[new name]-core (currently one for jsf 1.1 and one for jsf 1.2) optional: commons-[new

Re: new name for sev-en

. Other then that, like Andrew, I've got enough on my plate ATM... Scott Andrew Robinson wrote: Sounds like fun, but I've already put enough on my plate :) Perhaps in the future. On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 4:45 PM, Gerhard Petracek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: hello, 'sev-en

Re: new name for sev-en

yeah, just having a later version of your same Jar should suffice for most projects. Some oddities between JSF11 and JSF12 notwithstanding. :) On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 12:27 AM, Gerhard Petracek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: hello scott, there might be fewer jar-files. i know

Re: new name for sev-en

should also have a mechanism in the build scripts where we can compile and test the validation and bean-validation packaged against the 1.1 code base to ensure all the contracts are followed. Scott Gerhard Petracek wrote: hello, +1 for a separated core jar-file too! it isn't about

TRINIDAD-359

hello, what's about the suggested approach - is there a special reason for not using it? regards, gerhard -- http://www.irian.at Your JSF powerhouse - JSF Consulting, Development and Courses in English and German Professional Support for Apache MyFaces

Re: [VOTE] sev-en as a new myfaces sub-project

then a clear +1 from my side. Werner Gerhard Petracek schrieb: hello werner, thank you for your additional hint. however, we already discussed this topic and there are several

Re: [VOTE] sev-en as a new myfaces sub-project

a short addition that there is no misunderstanding: !?! = i'm not completely sure if we should close the vote now - in my opinion we are finished. regards, gerhard 2008/4/26 Gerhard Petracek [EMAIL PROTECTED]: hello matthias, yes - i think the vote is finished!?! a new name is the next

Re: new name for sev-en

hello alexander, i got your idea. however, i hope we will find a short and fancy name. if we don't have 'core' within the name, i think we have to find something else than just 'validation'. otherwise it will be a bit confusing for users due to the fact that the core itself doesn't validate.

Re: new name for sev-en

is nearly an enhancement number for java. You wouln't name your project something like MyFaces-1234 after a Jira ticket number. On Apr 26, 2008, at 10:25 AM, Gerhard Petracek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: hello alexander, i got your idea. however, i hope we will find a short and fancy name

Re: new name for sev-en

think). Gerhard Petracek wrote: hello scott, do you have a suggestion for a short and fancy name? regards, gerhard 2008/4/27 Scott O'Bryan [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] : +1 to not naming it validations. There is already a commons validator. -0 to including

Re: new name for sev-en

On Sat, May 10, 2008 at 3:12 PM, Hazem Saleh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: +1 for myfaces-commons-checker. On Sat, May 10, 2008 at 1:53 PM, Gerhard Petracek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: do you have a further suggestion? maybe a bit more fancy? e.g. one of the suggestions i heard is: myfaces

Re: Adobe Flex components as MyFaces JSF components

hello, i had just a very quick look at it. do you plan to support existing jsf artifacts (e.g. converters, validators,...)? @subproject and name: for each topic you have to start at least a vote. what's about the following idea: let's start a subproject for component libs like alchemy. in the

Re: new name for sev-en

checker sounds stupid. (krasser checker...) -M Sent from my iPod. Am 11.05.2008 um 01:55 schrieb Gerhard Petracek [EMAIL PROTECTED]: @andrew: it depends on the mother tongue. ;) for some of you 'seven' sounds boring - especially if english is your mother tongue. words of foreign

Re: [COMMUNITY] MyFaces += Hazem Saleh

welcome! regards, gerhard 2008/5/16 Paul Spencer [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Hazem, Welcome to MyFaces. Paul Spencer Manfred Geiler wrote: The Myfaces PMC is proud to announce a new addition to our community. Please welcome Hazem Saleh as the newest MyFaces committer! Hazem is an active

shared source code within myfaces

hello, for the patches of TRINIDAD-1088 i used the source code of the myfaces state manager to detect duplicate component id's. i don't like to have duplicate source code! what's your opinion about moving all shared source code like this to a 'commons' module like the already existing

Re: shared source code within myfaces

from MyFaces for it's configurators, so there is a prescidence. IMO, duplicating a small amount of code is preferable to adding at least 3 jar dependencies and making the core dependent on a util library. Scott On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 3:35 PM, Gerhard Petracek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: hello

Re: shared source code within myfaces

context for multi-window-support. So it seems generally useful to have at least the basics of a StateManager implementation in shared. Regards, Simon On Thu, 2008-05-22 at 01:00 +0200, Gerhard Petracek wrote: i see your point. there are some pros and cons! concerning the example you

[PROPOSAL] myfaces-extensions

due to the fact that we have a growing number of great extensions i would like to start a new discussion. some days ago we discussed [1] the following suggestion: let's setup just one sub-project for all new extensions. name of the subproject: e.g.: myfaces-extensions which contains something

Re: [PROPOSAL] myfaces-extensions

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Gerhard Petracek schrieb: ok - i'm fine with that. what i mean: there are also other suggestions out there (concerning alchemy) and it's a different kind of project - so let's discuss alchemy later on... regards, gerhard Well this is indeed a good

Re: [VOTE] myfaces-extensions as a new myfaces sub-project

+1 2008/6/2 Gerhard Petracek [EMAIL PROTECTED]: hello, we discussed whether or not we should start a new myfaces sub-project (details at: [1] and [2]). name: myfaces-extensions description: place for small innovative projects (which are beyond the current std. mechanisms of jsf

[Trinidad] tr:table suggestion

hello, i received the following suggestion concerning tr:table: it should be possible to format the alignment within the table-header for each column independently. what do you think about it? regards, gerhard -- http://www.irian.at Your JSF powerhouse - JSF Consulting, Development and

Re: [VOTE] To have MyFaces Alchemy as a subproject

hello, my previous comment concerning alchemy: it was my suggestion - +0.9 reason: maybe a restructuring of component libs as a whole is essential? at the moment: -0.5 (because there are some issues i haven't thought about so far) i think we should discuss it within an alchemy proposal. i'm

Re: [VOTE] To have MyFaces Alchemy as a subproject

hello, as i know the names changed - see [1]: - we vote on a new subproject for libs like flexfaces. myfaces-alchemy |_ myfaces-flexfaces |_ ... (e.g. the javascript project werner is working on) that's the reason why i said: i prefer to have the mentioned discussion before such a vote.

Re: [proposal] jsf validation with annotations

, have you noticed this? http://www.javalid.org/ -M On Thu, Apr 3, 2008 at 10:11 PM, Gerhard Petracek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: sev-en is a new jsf-extension. sev-en allows jsf validation with annotations! some central features: - cross-component validation (including cross

[VOTE RESULT] myfaces-extensions as a new myfaces sub-project

this vote passed with 100 % +1 regards, gerhard -- http://www.irian.at Your JSF powerhouse - JSF Consulting, Development and Courses in English and German Professional Support for Apache MyFaces

Re: [VOTE RESULT] myfaces-extensions as a new myfaces sub-project

, so folks that are interested can see what 100% means. -how many votes? -who actually submitted a vote Or, a new email with all voters and their vote... -M On Fri, Jun 6, 2008 at 9:45 AM, Gerhard Petracek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: this vote passed with 100 % +1 regards, gerhard

Re: [VOTE RESULT] myfaces-extensions as a new myfaces sub-project

thank you for the information. i know that - it was just because it was a definite pos. vote (inclusive more than 3 pmc votes) - i kept it short. - if really required, i'll do that. regards, gerhard 2008/6/6 [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Hi Gerhard, Gerhard Petracek schrieb

Result (was Re: [VOTE] myfaces-extensions as a new myfaces sub-project)

thank you for voting! all votes were +1 (chronological order): binding votes (pmc): - Manfred Geiler - Volker Weber - Matthias Wessendorf - Bruno Aranda - Grant Smith - Scott O'Bryan - Bernd Bohmann non-binding: - Hazem Saleh - Leonardo Uribe - Werner Punz - Gerhard Petracek regards, gerhard

Re: Result (was Re: [VOTE] myfaces-extensions as a new myfaces sub-project)

- Bernd Bohmann non-binding: - Gerhard Petracek - Hazem Saleh - Leonardo Uribe regards, gerhard 2008/6/6 Gerhard Petracek [EMAIL PROTECTED]: thank you for voting! all votes were +1 (chronological order): binding votes (pmc): - Manfred Geiler - Volker Weber - Matthias Wessendorf - Bruno

Re: [VOTE RESULT] myfaces-extensions as a new myfaces sub-project

details are at [1] regards, gerhard [1] http://www.nabble.com/Re%3A-Result-%28was-Re%3A--VOTE--myfaces-extensions-as-a-new-myfaces-sub-project%29-p17687491.html 2008/6/6 Gerhard Petracek [EMAIL PROTECTED]: thank you for the information. i know that - it was just because it was a definite

Re: [VOTE] name for 'seven'

+1 for myfaces-extensions-seven 2008/6/6 Gerhard Petracek [EMAIL PROTECTED]: hello, there are no new name suggestions concerning 'seven' [1]. so i suggest to start the vote. the new meaning of the acronym: *s*imple *e*nhanced *v*alidation with *e*xtensible *n*ature seven will be part

Result (was Re: [VOTE] name for 'seven')

] wrote: +1 for myfaces-extensions-seven, IMO it rocks. On Fri, Jun 6, 2008 at 3:43 PM, Gerhard Petracek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: +1 for myfaces-extensions-seven 2008/6/6 Gerhard Petracek [EMAIL PROTECTED]: hello, there are no new name suggestions concerning

Re: [VOTE] layout for myfaces-commons project

hello, what's about an uniform layout for all myfaces-projects? (currently it's also a blocking topic for me to setup myfaces-extensions-validator.) regards, gerhard 2008/6/20 Scott O'Bryan [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Mike, the problem with this approach is one of forward compatibility. Let me

Re: code style for new commons modules?

+1 for using the same codestyle for all myfaces projects. regards, gerhard 2008/7/14 Werner Punz [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Guess i have to clarify things here we have a huge codebase, following the myfaces codestyle, it simply does not make sense to use the sun codestyle, in one project if all

[ExtVal] road map

hello, this e-mail is about the road map of myfaces-extensions-validator (i'll use ExtVal as abbreviation) after the successful votes, some weeks of public review and some refactorings - i've imported sev-en as myfaces-extensions-validator into the repository. suggestions concerning the road

Re: [ExtVal] road map

great! regards, gerhard 2008/7/16 Glauco P. Gomes [EMAIL PROTECTED]: If you need help to translate to pt_BR I could help. Glauco P. Gomes Gerhard Petracek escreveu: hello, this e-mail is about the road map of myfaces-extensions-validator (i'll use ExtVal as abbreviation) after

[ExtVal] internationalized message bundles

hello, before we can even think about a release of myfaces-extensions-validator we have to add internationalized validation error messages. current volunteers: ar ... ca ... de ... Gerhard Petracek en ... Gerhard Petracek es ... fr ... it ... ja ... mt ... nl ... pl ... pt_BR ... Glauco P

Re: [ExtVal] internationalized message bundles

hello, great! the updated list: ar ... Hazem Saleh ca ... Bruno Aranda de ... Gerhard Petracek en ... Gerhard Petracek es ... Bruno Aranda fr ... Simon Lessard, Gilles Demarty it ... ja ... mt ... nl ... pl ... pt_BR ... Glauco P. Gomes ru ... tr ... Mert Çalışkan zh_CN ... regards, gerhard

Re: [ExtVal] internationalized message bundles

i just took the locales which are also supported by the myfaces-core. :) there would be much more out there (more than 100 variations) regards, gerhard 2008/10/9 Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Thu, Oct 9, 2008 at 4:02 PM, Gerhard Petracek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: hello

Re: [ExtVal] internationalized message bundles

/ 2008/10/10 Glauco P. Gomes [EMAIL PROTECTED] The base bundle is this? http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/myfaces/commons/trunk/myfaces-commons-utils/src/main/resources/org/apache/myfaces/commons/Messages.properties Glauco P. Gomes Gerhard Petracek escreveu: hello, great! the updated

Re: tomahawk examples design proposal

looks really great! +1 for the first one. regards, gerhard 2008/10/10 Thomas Spiegl [EMAIL PROTECTED] attached you'll find a proposal for a redesign of tomahawk examples. Please tell me, which one you like better. IRIAN will take care of implementing it over the next couple of weeks.

Re: [ExtVal] internationalized message bundles

wrong but according to what :) English is not my mother tongue, so just my two cents on those. and there is a tiny typo :) on no_match_details, *formate*, in validation_messages (baseval). Mert.. 2008/10/10 Gerhard Petracek [EMAIL PROTECTED] hello, no - that's a different project

Re: [ExtVal] internationalized message bundles

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Gerhard Petracek escreveu: what's your suggestion for the replacement of wrong? (the annotation is responsible to compare if one date value is before/after a second one) +1 to invalid Glauco P. Gomes -- Hazem Ahmed Saleh Ahmed Author

Re: Handling component rendered state during postback

hello, i agree with manfred. regards, gerhard 2008/10/13 Manfred Geiler [EMAIL PROTECTED] My understanding of attributes with a value binding is, that the EL expressions must ALWAYS be evaluated dynamically and must never be cached. The same applies for the rendered attribute. There is

Re: ExporterActionListener to commons

hello, i suggest to talk about the right place for new (and independent) components in general. regards, gerhard 2008/10/14 Hazem Saleh [EMAIL PROTECTED] Hello Team, I had previous old discussions with Volker about the future of the ExporterActionListener. And we agreed on moving this

Re: [ExtVal] internationalized message bundles

the Arabic translation, and Turkish translation done thanks to Mert. On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 12:51 PM, Glauco P. Gomes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Gerhard Petracek escreveu: what's your suggestion for the replacement of wrong? (the annotation is responsible to compare if one date value is before

Re: [orchestra] release orchestra-core version 1.3?

hello simon, sounds good to me. regards, gerhard 2008/10/14 Simon Kitching [EMAIL PROTECTED] Hi All, I think it is a good time to make another Orchestra Core release. There is nothing radical in this new version, but there are a couple of nice new features and a couple of useful

Re: JIRA: project entry needed for sandbox

+1 2008/10/14 Manfred Geiler [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 5:35 PM, Volker Weber [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, 2008/10/14 Simon Kitching [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Any JIRA admins here? There currently is no JIRA project defined for the myfaces sandbox. It appears that people

Re: [ExtVal] internationalized message bundles

Commited the spanish messages. regards Leonardo Uribe On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 11:38 AM, Simon Lessard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ok, good. Commited the French message without doubling the '. On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 11:59 AM, Gerhard Petracek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: hello simon, so

Re: [VOTE] release for myfaces builder plugin 1.0.2

+0 regards, gerhard 2008/10/21 Leonardo Uribe [EMAIL PROTECTED] +1 regards Leonardo Uribe On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 7:47 PM, Leonardo Uribe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I was running the needed tasks to get the 1.0.2 release of Apache MyFaces Builder Plugin out. This artifacts

Re: ExporterActionListener to commons

should include components, then these components should be independent + have no UI. +1 for those myfaces-commons-components Regards, Volker On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 4:35 PM, Gerhard Petracek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: hello, i suggest to talk about the right place for new

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >