Re: Java EE 8 Support Repairs - Enhancements to repair [NETBEANS-2800]

Hi Neil, I have not yet created the PR, but I will do so. One question though, when I compare files on the PR within my project on GitHub, it shows all of the commit history for the Java EE 8 commits...so there are 13 commits showing up in the PR. This is similar to the last PR I submitted that

Re: Is this design weird

FWIW: https://github.com/apache/netbeans/pull/1369 Jan On Thu, Jul 11, 2019 at 1:26 PM Christian Lenz wrote: > FYI: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NETBEANS-2343 > > > Cheers > > Chris > > > > Von: Peter Cheung > Gesendet: Donnerstag, 11. Juli 2019 13:13 > An: dev > Betreff: Re: Is this

Re: Java EE 8 Support Repairs - Enhancements to repair [NETBEANS-2800]

On Thu, 11 Jul 2019, 20:05 Josh Juneau, wrote: > > I have not yet created the PR, but I will do so. One question though, when > I compare files on the PR within my project on GitHub, it shows all of the > commit history for the Java EE 8 commits...so there are 13 commits showing > up in the PR.

Re: Java EE 8 Support Repairs - Enhancements to repair [NETBEANS-2800]

Hi Josh, On Thu, 11 Jul 2019 at 04:05, Josh Juneau wrote: > At this point, I would like to request that we create a vc2 to include > these new enhancements. That way, the Java EE 8 support should be much > more stable, as the web.xml 4.0 would now being recognized correctly by the > IDE. Looks

Re: Blocker for vc1: please try to reproduce -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NETBEANS-2824

I can't reproduce the error. Permalink Edit

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans 11.1 [vote candidate 1]

-1 (binding) Dear all, You won't like me, as it is all my fault. What was checked: Checksum - OK Signatures - OK LICENSE, NOTICE, DEPENDENCIES - OK NOTICE Year - FAIL Build from Source - OK Run on Ubuntu with OpenJDK8 - OK Run on Ubuntu with OpenJDK11 - OK Run on Ubuntu with OpenJDK12 - OK

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans 11.1 [vote candidate 1]

Great, can you provide a PR to fix this, together with the PRs from Gaurav, Josh, and Toni, we’ll enable Neil to create beta-4 in preparation for vc2 early next week, yes, small slip, but we’re learning and it’s a process. Gj On Thu, 11 Jul 2019 at 23:00, Laszlo Kishalmi wrote: > -1 (binding)

Re: Java EE 8 Support Repairs - Enhancements to repair [NETBEANS-2800]

Thanks Neil! I’ll submit the PR tonight. I appreciate it. Josh Juneau http://jj-blogger.blogspot.com https://www.apress.com/index.php/author/author/view/id/1866 > On Jul 11, 2019, at 3:04 PM, Neil C Smith wrote: > >> On Thu, 11 Jul 2019, 20:05 Josh Juneau, wrote: >> >> >> I have not

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans 11.1 [vote candidate 1]

Me too. Built it successfully as well and will be voting +1 today. We also must remember this is not a LTS release, i.e., it will not be perfect and the better we can document that, the better. I.e., let's provide a list of issues that we know are significant in the Java EE 8 world, since that's

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans 11.1 [vote candidate 1]

+1 I've been using netbeans 11.1 for a while, it's good and functioning smoothly, I like it. 在2019年07月11，上午 3:41，Neil C Smith 写道： Dear all, This is our first voting candidate for the 11.1 release of Apache NetBeans. Apache NetBeans 11.1 constitutes all clusters in the Apache NetBeans Git

Re: Java EE 8 Support Repairs - Enhancements to repair [NETBEANS-2800]

On Thu, 11 Jul 2019, 04:05 Josh Juneau, wrote: > At this point, I would like to request that we create a vc2 to include > these new enhancements. That way, the Java EE 8 support should be much > more stable, as the web.xml 4.0 would now being recognized correctly by the > IDE. > How major is

Re: Java EE 8 Support Repairs - Enhancements to repair [NETBEANS-2800]

On Thu, 11 Jul 2019 at 09:18, Geertjan Wielenga wrote: > We should just document the various features that aren’t quite right yet > and create issues for them. If we don’t, this is potentially the start of a > very significant slip that we can’t afford. Agreed, particularly now I can get into

Re: Java EE 8 Support Repairs - Enhancements to repair [NETBEANS-2800]

The other thing to bear in mind is that Josh is now really in the groove, or whatever the term is, in terms of his Java EE 8 / NetBeans development skills -- this is excellent news. It's all good from here, since everything he does will just accumulate from one release to the next. We should see

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans 11.1 [vote candidate 1]

On Thu, 11 Jul 2019 at 14:54, Alessandro wrote: > Don't know if this matters a lot but the NOTICE file in the source archive > is completely different from that on the git repository (copyright end > year, additional license statements for Kotlin, IntelliJ IDEA, Struts, > Jakarta Validator).

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans 11.1 [vote candidate 1]

+1 I have been using apache Netbeans 11.1 for sometime and its working as expected. On Thu, Jul 11, 2019, 11:49 Geertjan Wielenga wrote: > Me too. Built it successfully as well and will be voting +1 today. > > We also must remember this is not a LTS release, i.e., it will not be > perfect and

Re: Website changes for NB 11.1

On Thu, 11 Jul 2019 at 09:42, huang kai wrote: > > +1 and I think there should be a group of links that link to the older build > of netbeans. Thanks! Yes, my intention is for the [Find out more] button under Older Releases to link across to a sub-page to group all those links and related

Re: Building Apache NetBeans with JDK 11

Never mind, I had to set JAVA_HOME to the same JDK as the JDK I am using for running Ant. Now everything is going well. Gj On Thu, Jul 11, 2019 at 11:34 AM Geertjan Wielenga wrote: > Hi all, > > I'm especially interested in getting us to a point where we can build on > the latest Java LTS

Re: Is this design weird

is my subject misleading? being offence? or? Thanks >From Peter From: Geertjan Wielenga Sent: Thursday, July 11, 2019 6:42 PM To: dev Subject: Re: Is this design weird Sorry, you're going to have to think harder about the subject lines of your e-mails. This is

Re: Java EE 8 Support Repairs - Enhancements to repair [NETBEANS-2800]

Thanks Geertjan and Neil, I agree with your assessment. Let's deliver 11.1 with the Java EE 8 support, as-is, and we'll continue to improve it for future releases. It is true that I now understand much more of the Java EE support code in NetBeans...so making these enhancements for future

Re: Is this design weird

On Thu, 11 Jul 2019 at 12:17, Emilian Bold wrote: > I think it's an editor bug to show that hyperlink for every word when > Cmd is pressed. It normally should show that only if there is some > action possible, but I guess there might be some design considerations > that make querying that a bit

Testimonial about NetBeans wanted

Hello NetBeans users, Would you be interested in writing a short page about yourself for http://www.codeswith.com ? This site is similar in style with http://runbsd.info/ or http://usesthis.com/ Right now I'm primarily looking for C/C++ developers that use NetBeans (since there is no such

Re: Is this design weird

Yes, my impression is that either the architecture does not allow the editor to query at the moment for an actual action or it would destroy the performance. Could also be a plain bug of course and maybe we just need an `action !=null` check :-) Somebody will have to dig in there though and see

AW: Is this design weird

FYI: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NETBEANS-2343 Cheers Chris Von: Peter Cheung Gesendet: Donnerstag, 11. Juli 2019 13:13 An: dev Betreff: Re: Is this design weird is my subject misleading? being offence? or? Thanks >From Peter From: Geertjan

Re: Is this design weird

On Thu, Jul 11, 2019 at 1:13 PM Peter Cheung wrote: > is my subject misleading? being offence? or? > Well, "Is this design weird" is not descriptive, at all. Please, be descriptive and detailed, even in the subject line. Scanning through my e-mails, I will have no idea what this is about in a

Re: Java EE 8 Support Repairs - Enhancements to repair [NETBEANS-2800]

On Thu, 11 Jul 2019 at 12:51, Josh Juneau wrote: > > Thanks Geertjan...I will provide some details of the Java EE 8 support in > 11.1 on the wiki page. > Could you also add a known issues and workarounds section? That would be useful to add on the website. I wonder if we should also use

Re: Building Apache NetBeans with JDK 11

Java EE 8 is not specifically tied to JDK 8. The only reason why that is a barrier right now is because of the container support. If a container vendor, such as Payara, compiles and makes Java EE 8 libraries available under a newer JDK then it should work. Therefore, Payara 5.192 supports JDK

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans 11.1 [vote candidate 1]

+1 ... The vc1 sources build without issue. Verified files and signature. Thanks for the hard work! On Wed, Jul 10, 2019 at 2:41 PM Neil C Smith wrote: > Dear all, > > This is our first voting candidate for the 11.1 release of Apache NetBeans. > > Apache NetBeans 11.1 constitutes all clusters

Re: Java EE 8 Support Repairs - Enhancements to repair [NETBEANS-2800]

Great to hear we're on the same page. I confess I do not know exactly what the Java EE 8 work you have done for 11.1 consists of, exactly. The more details you can provide on this page, as the basis for the official one to be published on netbeans.apache.org, even if simply a bulleted list, would

Re: Java EE 8 Support Repairs - Enhancements to repair [NETBEANS-2800]

Agreed. Gj On Thu, Jul 11, 2019 at 2:14 PM Neil C Smith wrote: > On Thu, 11 Jul 2019 at 13:06, Geertjan Wielenga > wrote: > > > > Makes sense to me. The other approach is to consider all non-LTS releases > > as preview releases by default, i.e., preview release for the next LTS > > release. >

Re: Building Apache NetBeans with JDK 11

Apache NetBeans 11.1 builds and runs with JDK 11 LTS, excellent. *Product Version:* Apache NetBeans IDE 11.1 *Java:* 11.0.1; Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM 11.0.1+13-LTS *Runtime:* Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment 11.0.1+13-LTS *System:* Mac OS X version 10.13.6 running on x86_64; UTF-8;

Re: Java EE 8 Support Repairs - Enhancements to repair [NETBEANS-2800]

On Thu, 11 Jul 2019 at 13:06, Geertjan Wielenga wrote: > > Makes sense to me. The other approach is to consider all non-LTS releases > as preview releases by default, i.e., preview release for the next LTS > release. Yes, that was definitely my thoughts on the schedule and making use of

Re: Java EE 8 Support Repairs - Enhancements to repair [NETBEANS-2800]

That's great to hear, thanks Josh. Gj On Thu, Jul 11, 2019 at 2:17 PM Josh Juneau wrote: > Hi Neil/Geertjan, > > I think that we should list the "Known Issues" on the wiki page, but we > should leave the "Preview" text off. There are workarounds that will > enable full functionality for the

Is this design weird

Hi In mac, when i mouse over any word in editor and press "command" key, even the word in comment, it will show highlight that word and show the "click" cursor, but that word doesn't have "go to source" destination. So even i click on it, it has no effect. If no effect, it shouldn't

Re: Java EE 8 Support Repairs - Enhancements to repair [NETBEANS-2800]

On Thu, 11 Jul 2019 at 10:24, Geertjan Wielenga wrote: > > The other thing to bear in mind is that Josh is now really in the groove, > or whatever the term is, in terms of his Java EE 8 / NetBeans development > skills -- this is excellent news. It's all good from here, since everything > he does

Re: Java EE 8 Support Repairs - Enhancements to repair [NETBEANS-2800]

Absolutely agree. Gj On Thu, Jul 11, 2019 at 12:43 PM Neil C Smith wrote: > On Thu, 11 Jul 2019 at 10:24, Geertjan Wielenga > wrote: > > > > The other thing to bear in mind is that Josh is now really in the groove, > > or whatever the term is, in terms of his Java EE 8 / NetBeans development

Re: Is this design weird

It's not perfect English but your email seems fine. I think it's an editor bug to show that hyperlink for every word when Cmd is pressed. It normally should show that only if there is some action possible, but I guess there might be some design considerations that make querying that a bit harder.

Re: Building Apache NetBeans with JDK 11

Yes, this is something I'm not clear about -- isn't Java EE 8 tied to JDK 8? Correct me if I'm wrong. Should GlassFish and Payara run with anything other than JDK 8? Gj On Thu, Jul 11, 2019 at 1:39 PM Josh Juneau wrote: > Glad to hear that JDK 11 seems to be working well with Apache NetBeans >

Re: Java EE 8 Support Repairs - Enhancements to repair [NETBEANS-2800]

Thanks Geertjan...I will provide some details of the Java EE 8 support in 11.1 on the wiki page. Josh Juneau juneau...@gmail.com http://jj-blogger.blogspot.com https://www.apress.com/us/search?query=Juneau On Thu, Jul 11, 2019 at

Re: [jira] [Updated] (NETBEANS-2824) No Properties dialog showing in 11.1vc1 for Java Application

On Thu, 11 Jul 2019 at 17:51, Benjamin Graf (JIRA) wrote: > > [ > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NETBEANS-2824?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel > ] > > Benjamin Graf updated NETBEANS-2824: > > Environment:

Re: Is this design weird

Thanks Christian. So it's a regression. Should be doable to find what introduced this. @Peter: maybe you want to subscribe and vote on that issue? --emi On Thu, Jul 11, 2019 at 2:26 PM Christian Lenz wrote: > > FYI: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NETBEANS-2343 > > > Cheers > > Chris > >

Blocker for vc1: please try to reproduce -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NETBEANS-2824

Hi all, It would be great if multiple people would try to reproduce the below, which is a blocker for the 11.1 vc1 release. Can everyone, rather than asking more questions about things not related to the release, focus on trying to reproduce this problem, please:

Re: Building Apache NetBeans with JDK 11

I’ve been running 11.1 on the Amazon Corretto build of JDK 11.0.2+9-LTS I’m in a “death march” at work, so I live in NetBeans. It’s been flawless. > On Jul 11, 2019, at 3:13 AM, Geertjan Wielenga wrote: > > Apache NetBeans 11.1 builds and runs with JDK 11 LTS, excellent. > > *Product

Re: a couple of fixes..

On Thu, 11 Jul 2019 at 19:06, Brad Walker wrote: > > I have a couple of very simple fixes that I'm hoping didn't get forgotten > about since they are trivial. Merging to master is currently closed for anything not going into the NB 11.1 release. So they haven't been forgotten about, but also

a couple of fixes..

I have a couple of very simple fixes that I'm hoping didn't get forgotten about since they are trivial. https://github.com/apache/netbeans/pull/1364 https://github.com/apache/netbeans/pull/1309 I'm trying to clean up the compile warnings that are driving me crazy.. 8-) Thanks. -brad w.

RE: Blocker for vc1: please try to reproduce -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NETBEANS-2824

YOU ALL NAILED IT with NB 11.1... NO MORE PROBLEMS! KUDOS! Peter Borreggine Owner and Developer Angular/Bootstrap/NodeJS/Databases/HTML5/CSS3/Responsive Web Design/SEO WebParity.net A Service Connected Disabled Veteran Owned Business WA State License: 603-501-609 360-830-8926 C “Lead, Follow

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans 11.1 [vote candidate 1]

Here is it: https://github.com/apache/netbeans/pull/1370 As of the date in the NOTICE file, we need to check the build as both on master and on release111 the NOTICE file is different than the one ended up in the zip and both has the correct year: 2019. On 7/11/19 2:27 PM, Geertjan Wielenga

HyperlinkProvider::isHyperlinkPoint returns wrong offset

Hi all My netbeans-antlr plugin supports jump to source feature, it works well in Netbeans 8.2. I upgrade it to Netbeans 11 without changing any code, and I found HyperlinkProvider::isHyperlinkPoint giving me wrong offset. Any hints for it?

Re: Blocker for vc1: please try to reproduce -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NETBEANS-2824

Hi Neil, Payara Micro tooling works on top of *Maven Web application* project, so all project services registered for *org-netbeans-modules-maven/war* projectType. Except for ProjectCustomizer.CompositeCategoryProvider.Registration