Hi Geertjan, *
Am 10/17/2016 um 8:48 AM schrieb Geertjan Wielenga:
Hi all,
Now that we have mailing lists and Wiki -- a next step is to have a
website, i.e., primarily to list the features of Apache NetBeans and to
make the documentation and tutorials available, i.e., to have a place to
move
BTW, in order to maintain our search engine ratings, we should migrate as
much as possible from netbeans.org to the new domain and use 301 redirects.
https://support.google.com/webmasters/answer/93633?hl=en
This can be a gradual process, as we move a tutorial or something we add a
301 on
Hi,
On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 8:48 AM, Geertjan Wielenga
wrote:
> ...Now that we have mailing lists and Wiki -- a next step is to have a
> website...
Quoting Daniel Gruno (our infra mentor) from a previous thread here:
> As for web site, there's the choice
Hi all,
+1 for a solution like GitHub pages. I would prefer asciidoc (I think the
groovy guys are working along such a process already)
Sven
Am 17.10.2016 10:09 schrieb "Bertrand Delacretaz" :
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 8:48 AM, Geertjan Wielenga
>
Hi all,
Now that we have mailing lists and Wiki -- a next step is to have a
website, i.e., primarily to list the features of Apache NetBeans and to
make the documentation and tutorials available, i.e., to have a place to
move the relevant parts of netbeans.org.
Or is the Wiki also going to be
@Daniel this is the first time I hear this!
Yes, Oracle will grant the netbeans.org domain, it's part of the Incubator
proposal (https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/NetBeansProposal ):
Oracle owns trademark registrations for the NetBeans mark in the U.S. and
> EU, and would donate those, including
On 10/17/2016 10:47 AM, Emilian Bold wrote:
> BTW, in order to maintain our search engine ratings, we should migrate as
> much as possible from netbeans.org to the new domain and use 301 redirects.
Provided Oracle grants us netbeans.org, there is no need to move any
URLs. The user-facing part of
@Bruno see the thread "[PROPOSAL] Split the main NetBeans repo" which
discusses splitting the repo per clusters. It's a pretty good idea and the
history loss is minimal. Probably the way we are going to go.
--emi
On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 10:08 PM, Bruno Souza wrote:
> I