Re: Slack vs dev list (was: Code contribution process.)

> > > things might get lost that are important without us realising, > particularly in channels other than #general. Whether the solution is > logging or another similar service with better archiving, I don't > know. I do think it's a communication medium that ends up being used > in a way

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans HTML/Java API version 1.5.1

+1 On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 11:37 AM, Geertjan Wielenga < geertjan.wiele...@googlemail.com> wrote: > +1 > > > > On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 11:36 AM, Anton Epple > wrote: > > > +1 > > > > Am 13.11.17, 11:35 schrieb "Jaroslav Tulach" >: > > > >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans 9.0 Alpha (incubating)

+1 On Tue, Nov 7, 2017 at 1:23 PM, Jan Lahoda wrote: > Hi Michael, > > I think that's right. I've re-run the job, specifying the version. The > updated artefacts are: > source: > https://builds.apache.org/view/Incubator%20Projects/job/ >

Re: Apache HTML/Java UI instead of ... Oracle will remove JavaFX from Oracle JDK

> > > To help us out of this situation and save Java as a programming language I > dedicated my days to smoothing out interoperability between Java and > JavaScript with the goal to reuse the most flexible and portable rendering > system of these days: the browser. My work has already been donated

Re: [VOTE] Apache NetBeans graduation to Top Level Project

+1

Re: Installers for Apache NetBeans 11

> > 1. Is this too late for inclusion in our official release? They haven't > been tried out as part of the NetCAT process, so should we wait to include > these not in the upcoming release, but in the release afterwards? > As the PR has not been merged, this piece of code hasn't been voted on

Re: Installers for Apache NetBeans 11

> > > Do the sources of the installers matter, at all? What they are is a > convenience binary, which is outside the scope of what Apache releases in > the same way as a ZIP file. > > For RCP based applications it sure does.