Re: [DISCUSS] NetBeans Transition Status

[Wade Chandler]

Undoubtedly to some degree. However, the account referenced is interesting
from a branding perspective; currently a negative IMO. Too, how does this
work?

https://github.com/apache/groovy
https://github.com/groovy

Thanks

Wade

On Oct 26, 2016 5:41 AM, "John McDonnell"  wrote:
>
> Would you not migrate to the apache guthub account?
https://github.com/apache
>
> and have a repository in there under https://github.com/apache/netbeans ?
>
>
>
> On 26 October 2016 at 09:53, Emilian Bold  wrote:
> > This is a low priority task and tangential to the migration.
> >
> > You could contact GitHub based on their policy
> > https://help.github.com/articles/name-squatting-policy/ and/or the user
> > owning https://github.com/netbeans and try to get the netbeans account.
> >
> > We could use the netbeans account in the future for some NetBeans repos.

Re: [DISCUSS] NetBeans Transition Status

[Emilian Bold]

This is a low priority task and tangential to the migration.

You could contact GitHub based on their policy
https://help.github.com/articles/name-squatting-policy/ and/or the user
owning https://github.com/netbeans and try to get the netbeans account.

We could use the netbeans account in the future for some NetBeans repos.



--emi

On Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at 11:40 AM, Geertjan Wielenga <
geertjan.wiele...@googlemail.com> wrote:

> Everything in hg.netbeans.org that meets Apache requirements (i.e., source
> code only, licensing requirements etc) is included.
>
> Gj
>
> On Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at 10:31 AM, Emilian Bold 
> wrote:
>
> > Is the http://hg.netbeans.org/releases/ repository included in the code
> > grant?
> >
> > Since NetBeans 8.2 has been released fixes would go on its release82
> branch
> > (eg. http://hg.netbeans.org/releases/shortlog/5486daac4805 ) while
> normal
> > development for NetBeans 9 continues in the main repositories.
> >
> > If releases is not included we will be unable to provide or backport
> fixes
> > under Apache NetBeans.
> >
> >
> > --emi
> >
> > On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 5:44 PM, Sven Reimers 
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Same for
> > >
> > > community-xml, community-ruby, community-soa, community-uml,
> > > community-visualweb
> > >
> > > Seems they were important enough to be already in separate
> repositories..
> > >
> > > Sven
> > >
> > > Am 11.10.2016 16:34 schrieb "Julien Enselme" :
> > >
> > > > On Tue, 2016-10-11 at 11:32 +0300, Emilian Bold wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I believe contributors to 'contrib' need to sign an Oracle
> > > > > > contributor
> > > >
> > > > I know I had to sign a Oracle contributor agreement to become part of
> > > > the project and get commit access. So I would say yes too.
> > > >
> > > > Furthermore, as far as I know, all the files should have a GLP header
> > > > containing:
> > > > Copyright 2010 Oracle and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved.
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > I wasn't aware nbpython is under contrib/. This is pretty great! It
> > > > > means
> > > > > NBPython will become an Apache project too. Maybe the first Apache
> > > > > NetBeans
> > > > > sub-project?
> > > >
> > > > I hope so!
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > --emi
> > > > >
> > > > > On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 11:25 AM, Geertjan Wielenga <
> > > > > geertjan.wiele...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I believe contributors to 'contrib' need to sign an Oracle
> > > > > > contributor
> > > > > > agreement.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Gj
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 10:21 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz <
> > > > > > bdelacre...@apache.org> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 10:06 AM, Geertjan Wielenga
> > > > > > >  wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > ...Will add 'contrib' as part of Further Resources that we
> > > > > > > > should not forget
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Do these modules belong to Oracle as well?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > If not you might need separate software grants for them as per
> > > > > > > http://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > -Bertrand
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Julien Enselme
> > > > http://www.jujens.eu/
> > >
> >
>

Re: [DISCUSS] NetBeans Transition Status

[Julien Enselme]

On Tue, 2016-10-11 at 11:32 +0300, Emilian Bold wrote:
> > 
> > I believe contributors to 'contrib' need to sign an Oracle
> > contributor

I know I had to sign a Oracle contributor agreement to become part of
the project and get commit access. So I would say yes too.

Furthermore, as far as I know, all the files should have a GLP header
containing:
Copyright 2010 Oracle and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved.

> 
> I wasn't aware nbpython is under contrib/. This is pretty great! It
> means
> NBPython will become an Apache project too. Maybe the first Apache
> NetBeans
> sub-project?

I hope so!

> 
> 
> 
> --emi
> 
> On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 11:25 AM, Geertjan Wielenga <
> geertjan.wiele...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> 
> > 
> > I believe contributors to 'contrib' need to sign an Oracle
> > contributor
> > agreement.
> > 
> > Gj
> > 
> > On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 10:21 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz <
> > bdelacre...@apache.org> wrote:
> > 
> > > 
> > > On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 10:06 AM, Geertjan Wielenga
> > >  wrote:
> > > > 
> > > > ...Will add 'contrib' as part of Further Resources that we
> > > > should not forget
> > > 
> > > Do these modules belong to Oracle as well?
> > > 
> > > If not you might need separate software grants for them as per
> > > http://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/
> > > 
> > > -Bertrand
> > > 
> > 
-- 
Julien Enselme
http://www.jujens.eu/

signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: [DISCUSS] NetBeans Transition Status

[Geertjan Wielenga]

I believe contributors to 'contrib' need to sign an Oracle contributor
agreement.

Gj

On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 10:21 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz <
bdelacre...@apache.org> wrote:

> On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 10:06 AM, Geertjan Wielenga
>  wrote:
> > ...Will add 'contrib' as part of Further Resources that we
> > should not forget
>
> Do these modules belong to Oracle as well?
>
> If not you might need separate software grants for them as per
> http://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/
>
> -Bertrand
>

Re: [DISCUSS] NetBeans Transition Status

[Julien Enselme]

Putting my NBPython (Python plugin for NetBeans) hat: the plugin (as
well as several others) are currently hosted in at
http://hg.netbeans.org/main/contrib/

I don't think this repo was mentioned. Maybe it is included in
"SIR01 Migration of large existing Mercurial repository to Apache Git"
but from the discussion I followed, that's not what I understood: I
understood that only "core" will be migrated. That's not bad per see
since the plugins from contrib are not really part of NetBeans.

I just want to be sure it won't be forgotten in the process ;-) (and
that the contributors to contrib find a way to properly migrate the
whole repo or just their plugin to something else).

On Mon, 2016-10-10 at 17:22 +0200, Geertjan Wielenga wrote:
> Hello all,
> 
> Here I have tried to bring to the surface everything that we need to
> think
> about in the context of the transition of NetBeans to Apache:
> 
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Apache+Transitio
> n
> 
> Please take a look and let's discuss any items that are missing and
> let's
> discuss and clarify where to give them a place in the status page
> above.
> 
> We also need to define an order in which things need to be done --
> please
> use the ID numbers of an item as defined above.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Geertjan
-- 
Julien Enselme
http://www.jujens.eu/

signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part