Re: Propose for a patch to avoid duplicate native libs integration for supporting different windows os

Hi Matthias, thanks for your replay. I would prefer "windows" because this corresponds to "linux". An other open question is if there should be an equivialent patch for the JNA stuff. I will have a look at this. An other question is where are the files I have to patch to add the new

Re: Propose for a patch to avoid duplicate native libs integration for supporting different windows os

Hi Oliver, Am Sonntag, den 04.03.2018, 22:55 +0100 schrieb Oliver Rettig: > Yes, you are right. It is possible to put all files in the > modules/lib/amd64 folder to be loaded > on all 64 bit jvms on windows, but than in the same directory I have > also the .so-files for the > linux os. > > I

Re: Propose for a patch to avoid duplicate native libs integration for supporting different windows os

Yeah, using searching also for "windows" or similar, when "windows X" search yields nothing is fine idea. At least I think. -jt 2018-03-04 22:55 GMT+01:00 Oliver Rettig : > Hi Matthias, > > thanks for your help. > > > So if you place your .dll in the modules/lib/amd64

Re: Propose for a patch to avoid duplicate native libs integration for supporting different windows os

Hi Matthias, thanks for your help. > So if you place your .dll in the modules/lib/amd64 directory, it should > be loaded on all 64 bit JVMs on windows. Yes, you are right. It is possible to put all files in the modules/lib/amd64 folder to be loaded on all 64 bit jvms on windows, but than in

Re: Propose for a patch to avoid duplicate native libs integration for supporting different windows os

Hi Oliver, Am Sonntag, den 04.03.2018, 17:46 +0100 schrieb Oliver Rettig: > integration of native libs in the netbeans platform works fine for > windows, linux, 32bit, 64bit > etc. as described in > >