Congrats Moser!
On Oct 18, 2015 4:29 PM, "Joey Echeverria" wrote:
> Congratulations Michael!
>
> > On Oct 18, 2015, at 12:26, Joe Witt wrote:
> >
> > NiFi Community,
> >
> > On behalf of the Apache NiFI PMC, I am very pleased to announce that
> > Michael
lable" tickets to see which of them can
> be finished off for 0.7.0 and ping the appropriate committers to help out.
>
> Joe
> - - - - - - Joseph Percivall
> linkedin.com/in/Percivall
> e: joeperciv...@yahoo.com
>
>
>
>
>
> On Thursday, June 16, 2016 2:00 PM, Ryan Ward <ryan.wa...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> Will this one make 0.7?
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-1834
>
Will this one make 0.7?
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-1834
Bryan - I started to evaluate putTCP and agree Outgoing Message Delimiter
should be optional. I'm currently having to splitText to 1 in order to use
putTCP which doesn't seem like the most efficient approach. Was a JIRA ever
created for this capability?
On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 4:41 PM, Bryan
Joe - Is there a target date for 1.1?
On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 10:50 AM, Joe Witt wrote:
> Team,
>
> Just an update on things with working toward an Apache NiFi 1.1.0
> release. There are still about 33 JIRAs there now and some are
> awaiting review and are some are under
I've found that on a single node getSFTP is able to pull more files off a
remote server than Fetch in a cluster. I noticed Fetch doesn't have a max
selects so it is requiring way more connections (one per file?) and
concurrent threads to keep up.
Was wondering if anyone is using List/Fetch at
Witt <joe.w...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Ryan - dont know the code specifics behind FetchSFTP off-hand but i
> > can confirm there are users at that range for it.
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> > On Tue, Oct 31, 2017 at 11:38 AM, Ryan Ward <ryan.wa...@gmail.com>
esting experiment. It makes the
> code more challenging to write though, not that that's a reason not to
> do it.
>
> If you have a 5 node cluster, you are doing List on primary node and
> then redistributing the results to all the nodes via an RPG so all
> nodes can fetch?
>
&g
I'm seeing odd behavior trying to use attributes for the hostname and port
fields.
using ${endpoint_port} (9003) + hardcoded IP results in flowfile yielding
failed to process session due to java.lang.NumberFormatException: For input
string: "": {}
java.lang.NumberFormatException: For input
ate against flows when "Connection Per Flow
> File" is true b/c then we can create a new one every time, but when it
> is false it means you would have to potentially keep open many
> connections.
>
> It also may be confusing though to have differing evaluation based on
&
t;marcogaid...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > > Hi Ryan,
> > >
> > > probably the reason of the behavior is that EL on PutTCP is enabled but
> > it
> > > is not run on the incoming flowfile. So it doesn't care the attributes
> of
> > &
I just came across NIFI-6150 and was wondering if there are plans to
release 1.9.2?
Our content repo (7 tb) will fill up if not restarted ever few hours, we
had to fall back to 1.8.
On Wed, Mar 27, 2019 at 10:50 AM BINLEI XUE wrote:
> Me too
>
> On Wed, Mar 27, 2019 at 10:47 PM Ryan Ward wrote:
>
> > I just came across NIFI-6150 and was wondering
Hi Joe - Did you resolve your issue? If so I am wondering what the fix was
as I'm seeing the same error on my cluster.
On Thu, Feb 27, 2020 at 3:13 AM Endre Kovacs
wrote:
> Hi Joe,
>
> 1. Have you tried connecting/debugging with openssl? From one pod to the
> other:
> (openssl s_client
https://protonmail.com) Secure Email.
>
> ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
> On Tuesday, March 3, 2020 12:40 PM, Ryan Ward
> wrote:
>
> > Hi Joe - Did you resolve your issue? If so I am wondering what the fix
> was as I'm seeing the same error on my cluster.
> >
> > On Thu,
15 matches
Mail list logo