Re: Namespaces in MiNiFI-cpp

2017-02-16 Thread Aldrin Piri
+1 On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 9:32 AM, Jeremy Dyer wrote: > Marc - I responded in https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MINIFI-217 > directly but I think this is a good idea. The sooner we do this the less > painful it will be. I also like the additional namespaces like *io and >

Re: Namespaces in MiNiFI-cpp

2017-02-16 Thread Jeremy Dyer
Marc - I responded in https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MINIFI-217 directly but I think this is a good idea. The sooner we do this the less painful it will be. I also like the additional namespaces like *io and *processors that you lay out in the JIRA. On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 7:24 AM, Marc

Namespaces in MiNiFI-cpp

2017-02-16 Thread Marc
Good timezone appropriate salutation, I'd like to move the MiNiFi-CPP agent to a more controlled namespace, namely org::apache::nifi::minifi . In an upcoming PR I'll introduce a directory for I/O activities and using namespaces will help better isolate and encapsulate the duties of the code;