Re: Imxrt 1050

2020-01-28 Thread Embedded Systems
Hello Dave, Thank you very much for the information. I will also keep an eye if i see something in that direction! Best regards, Ivan Ucherdzhiev On Tue, Jan 28, 2020 at 12:55 AM Dave Marples wrote: > > On 07/01/2020 13:42, Embedded Systems wrote: > > Hello, > > > > I found what is cousin

Re: [DISCUSS] Wrapping up the Workflow document

2020-01-28 Thread Abdelatif Guettouche
Hi David, Are you assuming that the work is always on a same feature that you submit PRs gradually? The git usage looks off to me. It would be better to avoid deleting branches > and using noises merge commits. > What are the cons of deleting branches? What merge commits? I don't understand this

[DISCUSS] Security list

2020-01-28 Thread Flavio Junqueira
This is Flavio, I'm one of the project mentors, and I'd like to start a discussion thread about creating a security list. Let me start with some background. The ASF has a security team that provides guidance to projects on security matters and coordinates the handling of security

Re: NuttX at FOSDEM 2020

2020-01-28 Thread Philippe Coval
On Tue, Jan 28, 2020 at 9:02 PM Alan Carvalho de Assis wrote: > Hi Brenan, > > Did you see it: https://fosdem.org/2020/scheduleshow caseshow > case/event/iotnuttx/ Hi, Yes I will walk through a PoC demo built on NuttX and some other blocks on

RE: [DISCUSS] Wrapping up the Workflow document

2020-01-28 Thread David Sidrane
Hi Abdelatif, > Are you assuming that the work is always on a same feature that you submit PRs gradually? It can be but does not have to be. > What are the cons of deleting branches? Lost work. A botched commit by committer and you have nothing to compare it to. branches are FREE. > What

unconditional 32kHz xtal oscillator on SAM34

2020-01-28 Thread Bernd Walter
I have had problens with a new SAM4S based board in that it hang eraly during startup, before initializing my 12MHz xtal. Also the SWD didn't work anymore until I erased the chip. Since the SWD didn't work it was quite obvious that there is some clock related issue. I've found out that the startup

Re: [nuttx] unconditional 32kHz xtal oscillator on SAM34

2020-01-28 Thread Alan Carvalho de Assis
Hi Bernd, On 1/28/20, Bernd Walter wrote: > I have had problens with a new SAM4S based board in that it hang eraly > during startup, before initializing my 12MHz xtal. > Also the SWD didn't work anymore until I erased the chip. > Since the SWD didn't work it was quite obvious that there is some

Generic SPI interface to LCD

2020-01-28 Thread Dave Marples
Greg, Here's a patch^h^h^h^h^htxt which allows the use of a generic spi interface for controlling an LCD display.  It has been tested with the ili9341 but should work with others without too much pain...hopefully this will be useful to Ben, who I know has been looking for such a thing. To

Porting USB Host driver on to RX65N controller...

2020-01-28 Thread Phani Kumar
Hi Greg and all, As part of porting USB Host driver for RX65N, I am referring to LPC17_40 USB Host port. Here are some of the points, where I need your suggestions. Please let me know if you have any pointers/ other references on this. HCCA (Host communication area details), TDTAIL (Transfer

Re: [DISCUSS] Wrapping up the Workflow document

2020-01-28 Thread Miguel Ángel Herranz
Hi Nathan, I reviewed the document and added some inlines comments (not sure if they are not recommended for use though). I haven't edited/added any text though, but I will be glad to help if needed. Cheers, Miguel On Fri, Jan 24, 2020 at 4:29 PM Nathan Hartman wrote: > Hi all, > > The

[GitHub] [incubator-nuttx-testing] maht opened a new pull request #2: Multibranch pipeline job example

2020-01-28 Thread GitBox
maht opened a new pull request #2: Multibranch pipeline job example URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-nuttx-testing/pull/2 This is an example of code to help to setup a multibranch pipeline job as described in this [continuous integration draft

Re: Jenkins CI

2020-01-28 Thread Miguel Ángel Herranz
Hi, after some research about new releases of Jenkins, it seems that my proposal can be improved towards a simpler setup, so I modified it. I have included some code as pull requests that could be useful to discuss upon: https://github.com/apache/incubator-nuttx-testing/pull/2 and

Re: [nuttx] unconditional 32kHz xtal oscillator on SAM34

2020-01-28 Thread Bernd Walter
On Tue, Jan 28, 2020 at 12:40:12PM -0300, Alan Carvalho de Assis wrote: > Hi Bernd, > > On 1/28/20, Bernd Walter wrote: > > I have had problens with a new SAM4S based board in that it hang eraly > > during startup, before initializing my 12MHz xtal. > > Also the SWD didn't work anymore until I

Re: [nuttx] unconditional 32kHz xtal oscillator on SAM34

2020-01-28 Thread Bernd Walter
On Tue, Jan 28, 2020 at 05:22:08PM +0100, Bernd Walter wrote: > On Tue, Jan 28, 2020 at 12:40:12PM -0300, Alan Carvalho de Assis wrote: > > Hi Bernd, > > > > On 1/28/20, Bernd Walter wrote: > > > I have had problens with a new SAM4S based board in that it hang eraly > > > during startup, before

Re: [DISCUSS] Wrapping up the Workflow document

2020-01-28 Thread Gregory Nutt
I reviewed the document and added some inlines comments (not sure if they are not recommended for use though). I haven't edited/added any text though, but I will be glad to help if needed. We need to get you on the PPMC where it would be easier for you to make contributions 

Re: [DISCUSS] Wrapping up the Workflow document

2020-01-28 Thread Nathan Hartman
On Tue, Jan 28, 2020 at 11:49 AM Miguel Ángel Herranz wrote: > Hi Nathan, > > I reviewed the document and added some inlines comments (not sure if they > are not recommended for use though). > > I haven't edited/added any text though, but I will be glad to help if > needed. Hello Miguel,

Re: [DISCUSS] Wrapping up the Workflow document

2020-01-28 Thread David Sidrane
Hi Abdelatif, Yes I know. It is a defensive move, on my part, that makes it safe when working with multiple companies who might not appreciate me sharing their IP. David On Tue, Jan 28, 2020, 4:30 PM Abdelatif Guettouche < abdelatif.guettou...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi David, > > You can merge

RE: [DISCUSS] Wrapping up the Workflow document

2020-01-28 Thread David Sidrane
Hi Abdelatif > Why do you prefer git reset --hard /master to git merge /master after a fetch? Because with multiple remotes I am sure what local master is set to with a hard reset. There is no possibility of merging remote A into remote B master locally and no merge if I had the wrong remote.

Re: [DISCUSS] Wrapping up the Workflow document

2020-01-28 Thread Abdelatif Guettouche
Hi David, You can merge local branch from a different remote than the branch is tracking, giving that the merge is possible of course. On Wed, Jan 29, 2020 at 12:15 AM David Sidrane wrote: > > Hi Abdelatif > > > Why do you prefer git reset --hard /master to git merge > /master after a fetch? >

Re: [DISCUSS] Wrapping up the Workflow document

2020-01-28 Thread Abdelatif Guettouche
Hi David, Sorry for pointing the obvious. :) I do a lot of defensive moves myself too. I never use fetch, pull, mege or push without paramters. I also give my local branches different names than the remotes they are tracking. (Usally just a prefix of the remote) Pushing will then require

NuttX2020: Call for Participation

2020-01-28 Thread Alan Carvalho de Assis
Hi Everybody, The NuttX International Workshop is open! Please submit your proposal: https://nuttx.events/call-for-participation/ Passive participation is also accepted, just select the class: Passive Participant. BR, Alan

NuttX at FOSDEM 2020

2020-01-28 Thread Brennan Ashton
Being the large opensource conference that it is, I was curious if anyone in this project or Apache was planning on attending. I'm giving an unrelated talk, but it would be great to meet some more of you in person. --Brennan

Re: Jenkins CI

2020-01-28 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, > Thanks, good to know. I am asking my employer about including me in a > corporate one (CCLA [1]), but if it is too much paperwork I guess I can > just submit the ICLA. You would need to submit an ICLA. The CCLA is for more for your employer benefit not ours. Thanks, Justin

Re: NuttX at FOSDEM 2020

2020-01-28 Thread Alan Carvalho de Assis
Hi Brenan, Did you see it: https://fosdem.org/2020/schedule/event/iotnuttx/ BR, Alan On 1/28/20, Brennan Ashton wrote: > Being the large opensource conference that it is, I was curious if anyone > in this project or Apache was planning on attending. I'm giving an > unrelated talk, but it

Re: NuttX at FOSDEM 2020

2020-01-28 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, > Being the large opensource conference that it is, I was curious if anyone > in this project or Apache was planning on attending. There's lots of Apache people going, pop by their booth and say hi. I will not be there. Thanks, Justin