Re: [VOTE] Apache NuttX 12.1.0 RC0 release
yeah!! :-) -- CeDeROM, SQ7MHZ, http://www.tomek.cedro.info
RE: [VOTE] Apache NuttX 12.1.0 RC0 release
With my +1 I am closing the vote Thanks for supporting this release Best regards Alin -Original Message- From: Tomek CEDRO Sent: den 13 april 2023 13:38 To: dev@nuttx.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache NuttX 12.1.0 RC0 release On Wed, Apr 12, 2023 at 8:49 AM alin.jerpe...@sony.com wrote: > @Tomek > We need +1 or -1 > Does the "ERROR undefined symbol: backtrace " error appear on master? Sorry for the delay Alin, this also happens for me in 12.0 and master, so probably local setup problem :-) +1 :-) -- CeDeROM, SQ7MHZ, http://www.tomek.cedro.info
Re: [VOTE] Apache NuttX 12.1.0 RC0 release
On Wed, Apr 12, 2023 at 8:49 AM alin.jerpe...@sony.com wrote: > @Tomek > We need +1 or -1 > Does the "ERROR undefined symbol: backtrace " error appear on master? Sorry for the delay Alin, this also happens for me in 12.0 and master, so probably local setup problem :-) +1 :-) -- CeDeROM, SQ7MHZ, http://www.tomek.cedro.info
Re: [VOTE] Apache NuttX 12.1.0 RC0 release
+1 Tested on ESP32 Devkit-C board: ESP32: $ xtensa-esp32-elf-gcc -v Using built-in specs. COLLECT_GCC=xtensa-esp32-elf-gcc COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=/usr/local/bin/../libexec/gcc/xtensa-esp32-elf/8.4.0/lto-wrapper Target: xtensa-esp32-elf Configured with: /builds/idf/crosstool-NG/.build/xtensa-esp32-elf/src/gcc/configure --build=x86_64-build_pc-linux-gnu --host=x86_64-build_pc-linux-gnu --target=xtensa-esp32-elf --prefix=/builds/idf/crosstool-NG/builds/xtensa-esp32-elf --with-local-prefix=/builds/idf/crosstool-NG/builds/xtensa-esp32-elf/xtensa-esp32-elf --with-headers=/builds/idf/crosstool-NG/builds/xtensa-esp32-elf/xtensa-esp32-elf/include --with-newlib --enable-threads=no --disable-shared --with-pkgversion='crosstool-NG esp-2021r2-patch3' --disable-__cxa_atexit --enable-cxx-flags=-ffunction-sections --disable-libgomp --disable-libmudflap --disable-libmpx --disable-libssp --disable-libquadmath --disable-libquadmath-support --with-gmp=/builds/idf/crosstool-NG/.build/xtensa-esp32-elf/buildtools --with-mpfr=/builds/idf/crosstool-NG/.build/xtensa-esp32-elf/buildtools --with-mpc=/builds/idf/crosstool-NG/.build/xtensa-esp32-elf/buildtools --with-isl=/builds/idf/crosstool-NG/.build/xtensa-esp32-elf/buildtools --enable-lto --enable-target-optspace --without-long-double-128 --disable-nls --enable-multiarch --enable-languages=c,c++ --disable-libstdcxx-verbose --enable-threads=posix --enable-gcov-custom-rtio --enable-libstdcxx-time=yes Thread model: posix gcc version 8.4.0 (crosstool-NG esp-2021r2-patch3) $ ./tools/configure.sh esp32-devkitc:nsh $ make -j $ xtensa-esp32-elf-size nuttx textdata bss dec hex filename 81808 4245264 87496 155c8 nuttx $ make flash ESPTOOL_PORT=/dev/ttyUSB0 -j nsh> uname -a NuttX 12.1.0 d40f4032fc Apr 12 2023 17:27:39 xtensa esp32-devkitc nsh> free total used freelargest nused nfree Umem: 326904 7272 319632 188064 36 3 On 4/11/23, Alin Jerpelea wrote: > Hello all, > Apache NuttX 12.1.0 RC0 has been staged under [1] and it's > time to vote on accepting it for release. Voting will be open for 72hr. > > A minimum of 3 binding +1 votes and more binding +1 than binding -1 are > required to pass. > > The Apache requirements for approving a release can be found here [3] > "Before voting +1 [P]PMC members are required to download the signed > source code package, compile it as provided, and test the resulting > executable on their own platform, along with also verifying that the > package meets the requirements of the ASF policy on releases." > > A document to walk through some of this process has been published on > our project wiki and can be found here [4]. > > [ ] +1 accept (indicate what you validated - e.g. performed the non-RM > items in [4]) > [ ] -1 reject (explanation required) > > Thank you all, > Alin Jerpelea > > SCM Information: > Release tag: nuttx-12.1.0-RC0 > Hash for the release nuttx tag: d40f4032fc5491d2aeb9fde37042a5be9eabeb15 > Hash for the release nuttx-apps tag: > 125cf7abe2d7f345c3bc58c0bdea2360fdefa170 > > [1] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/nuttx/12.1.0-RC0/ > [2] > https://raw.githubusercontent.com/apache/nuttx/nuttx-12.1.0-RC0/ReleaseNotes > [3] https://www.apache.org/dev/release.html#approving-a-release > [4] > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NUTTX/Validating+a+staged+Release >
RE: [VOTE] Apache NuttX 12.1.0 RC0 release
Since my custom board still relies on a lot of out-of-tree stuff, I don't think I can yet check this RC in the approved manner. But, in the interests of trying to do my bit, I have rebased a new branch of my current WIP fork of the upstream master to the upstream releases/12.1 branch, and can confirm that I can build this for my custom target board with no errors or warnings, and it works as expected. So it's a non-binding +1 from me, if it helps! >-Original Message- >From: Alin Jerpelea >Sent: Tuesday, April 11, 2023 9:52 AM >To: dev@nuttx.apache.org >Subject: [VOTE] Apache NuttX 12.1.0 RC0 release > >Hello all, >Apache NuttX 12.1.0 RC0 has been staged under [1] and it's time to vote >on accepting it for release. Voting will be open for 72hr. > >A minimum of 3 binding +1 votes and more binding +1 than binding -1 are >required to pass. > >The Apache requirements for approving a release can be found here [3] >"Before voting +1 [P]PMC members are required to download the signed >source code package, compile it as provided, and test the resulting >executable on their own platform, along with also verifying that the >package meets the requirements of the ASF policy on releases." > >A document to walk through some of this process has been published on our >project wiki and can be found here [4]. > >[ ] +1 accept (indicate what you validated - e.g. performed the non-RM >items in [4]) [ ] -1 reject (explanation required) > >Thank you all, >Alin Jerpelea > >SCM Information: > Release tag: nuttx-12.1.0-RC0 > Hash for the release nuttx tag: >d40f4032fc5491d2aeb9fde37042a5be9eabeb15 > Hash for the release nuttx-apps tag: >125cf7abe2d7f345c3bc58c0bdea2360fdefa170 > >[1] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/nuttx/12.1.0-RC0/ >[2] https://raw.githubusercontent.com/apache/nuttx/nuttx-12.1.0- >RC0/ReleaseNotes >[3] https://www.apache.org/dev/release.html#approving-a-release >[4] >https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NUTTX/Validating+a+staged+Rel >ease
RE: [VOTE] Apache NuttX 12.1.0 RC0 release
@Tomek We need +1 or -1 Does the "ERROR undefined symbol: backtrace " error appear on master? Thanks Alin -Original Message- From: Tomek CEDRO Sent: den 12 april 2023 05:45 To: dev@nuttx.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache NuttX 12.1.0 RC0 release Quick test on FreeBSD AMD64 13.2-RELEASE-p0 (upgraded today from 13.1-RELEASE-p6). FreeBSD octagon 13.2-RELEASE FreeBSD 13.2-RELEASE releng/13.2-n254617-525ecfdad597 GENERIC amd64 ESP32 builds work fine, but sim:nsh build fails at linking backtrace o_O 1. ESP32-DEVKITC (OK, log truncated) 1.1. CoreMark (OK) gmake distclean ./tools/configure.sh -B esp32-devkitc:coremark gmake gmake flash ESPTOOL_PORT=/dev/cuaU0 ESPTOOL_BAUD=115200 cu -l /dev/cuaU0 -s 115200 rst:0x1 (POWERON_RESET),boot:0x13 (SPI_FAST_FLASH_BOOT) configsip: 0, SPIWP:0xee clk_drv:0x00,q_drv:0x00,d_drv:0x00,cs0_drv:0x00,hd_drv:0x00,wp_drv:0x00 mode:DIO, clock div:2 load:0x3fff0030,len:5656 load:0x40078000,len:12696 load:0x40080400,len:4292 entry 0x400806b0 Running CoreMark... 2K performance run parameters for coremark. CoreMark Size: 666 Total ticks : 12180 Total time (secs): 12.18 Iterations/Sec : 985.221675 Iterations : 12000 Compiler version : GCC8.4.0 Compiler flags : -O3 -fno-strict-aliasing -fomit-frame-pointer -ffunction-sections -fdata-sections Parallel PThreads : 2 Memory location : Stack seedcrc : 0xe9f5 [0]crclist : 0xe714 [1]crclist : 0xe714 [0]crcmatrix : 0x1fd7 [1]crcmatrix : 0x1fd7 [0]crcstate : 0x8e3a [1]crcstate : 0x8e3a [0]crcfinal : 0xa14c [1]crcfinal : 0xa14c Correct operation validated. See README.md for run and reporting rules. CoreMark 1.0 : 985.221675 / GCC8.4.0 -O3 -fno-strict-aliasing -fomit-frame-pointer -ffunction-sections -fdata-sections / Stack / 2:PThreads 1.2. NSH (OK) gmake distclean ./tools/configure.sh -B esp32-devkitc:nsh gmake gmake flash ESPTOOL_PORT=/dev/cuaU0 ESPTOOL_BAUD=115200 cu -l /dev/cuaU0 -s 115200 rst:0x1 (POWERON_RESET),boot:0x13 (SPI_FAST_FLASH_BOOT) configsip: 0, SPIWP:0xee clk_drv:0x00,q_drv:0x00,d_drv:0x00,cs0_drv:0x00,hd_drv:0x00,wp_drv:0x00 mode:DIO, clock div:2 load:0x3fff0030,len:5656 load:0x40078000,len:12696 load:0x40080400,len:4292 entry 0x400806b0 NuttShell (NSH) NuttX-12.1.0 nsh> uname -a NuttX 12.1.0 d40f4032fc-dirty Apr 12 2023 04:26:43 xtensa esp32-devkitc nsh> exit ~ [EOT] 2. SIM (build error in nsh) 2.1. ostest (OK) gmake distclean ./tools/configure.sh -B sim:ostest gmake ./nuttx stdio_test: write fd=1 stdio_test: Standard I/O Check: printf stdio_test: write fd=2 stdio_test: Standard I/O Check: fprintf to stderr ostest_main: putenv(Variable1=BadValue3) ostest_main: setenv(Variable1, GoodValue1, TRUE) ostest_main: setenv(Variable2, BadValue1, FALSE) ostest_main: setenv(Variable2, GoodValue2, TRUE) ostest_main: setenv(Variable3, GoodValue3, FALSE) ostest_main: setenv(Variable3, BadValue2, FALSE) show_variable: Variable=Variable1 has value=GoodValue1 show_variable: Variable=Variable2 has value=GoodValue2 show_variable: Variable=Variable3 has value=GoodValue3 ostest_main: Started user_main at PID=4 user_main: Begin argument test user_main: Started with argc=5 user_main: argv[0]="ostest" user_main: argv[1]="Arg1" user_main: argv[2]="Arg2" user_main: argv[3]="Arg3" user_main: argv[4]="Arg4" End of test memory usage: VARIABLE BEFORE AFTER arena 3fffd80 3fffd80 ordblks 22 mxordblk 3fb9a40 3fb9a40 uordblks4631046310 fordblks 3fb9a70 3fb9a70 user_main: getopt() test getopt(): Simple test getopt(): Invalid argument getopt(): Missing optional argument getopt_long(): Simple test getopt_long(): No short options getopt_long(): Argument for --option=argument getopt_long(): Invalid long option getopt_long(): Mixed long and short options getopt_long(): Invalid short option getopt_long(): Missing optional arguments getopt_long_only(): Mixed long and short options getopt_long_only(): Single hyphen long options 2.2. nsh (ERROR undefined symbol: backtrace) gmake clean distclean ./tools/configure.sh -B sim:nsh Copy files Select CONFIG_HOST_BSD=y Refreshing... CP: arch/dummy/Kconfig to /zraid/data/XXX/nuttxworkspace.git/nuttx/arch/dummy/dummy_kconfig CP: boards/dummy/Kconfig to /XXX/nuttxworkspace.git/nuttx/boards/dummy/dummy_kconfig LN: platform/board to /XXX/nuttxworkspace.git/apps/platform/dummy LN: include/arch to arch/sim/include LN: include/arch/board to /XXX/nuttxworkspace.git/nuttx/boards/sim/sim/sim/include LN: drivers/platform to /XXX/nuttxworkspace.git/nuttx/drivers/dummy LN: include/arch/chip to /XXX/nuttxworkspace.git/nuttx/arch/sim/include/sim LN: arch/sim/src/chip to /XXX/nuttxworkspace.git/nuttx/arch/sim/src/sim LN: arch/sim/src/board to /XXX/nuttxworkspace.git/nuttx/boards/sim/sim/sim/src mkkconfig in /XXX/nuttxworkspace.git/apps/audioutils mkkconfig in /XXX/nuttxworkspace.
Re: [VOTE] Apache NuttX 12.1.0 RC0 release
Quick test on FreeBSD AMD64 13.2-RELEASE-p0 (upgraded today from 13.1-RELEASE-p6). FreeBSD octagon 13.2-RELEASE FreeBSD 13.2-RELEASE releng/13.2-n254617-525ecfdad597 GENERIC amd64 ESP32 builds work fine, but sim:nsh build fails at linking backtrace o_O 1. ESP32-DEVKITC (OK, log truncated) 1.1. CoreMark (OK) gmake distclean ./tools/configure.sh -B esp32-devkitc:coremark gmake gmake flash ESPTOOL_PORT=/dev/cuaU0 ESPTOOL_BAUD=115200 cu -l /dev/cuaU0 -s 115200 rst:0x1 (POWERON_RESET),boot:0x13 (SPI_FAST_FLASH_BOOT) configsip: 0, SPIWP:0xee clk_drv:0x00,q_drv:0x00,d_drv:0x00,cs0_drv:0x00,hd_drv:0x00,wp_drv:0x00 mode:DIO, clock div:2 load:0x3fff0030,len:5656 load:0x40078000,len:12696 load:0x40080400,len:4292 entry 0x400806b0 Running CoreMark... 2K performance run parameters for coremark. CoreMark Size: 666 Total ticks : 12180 Total time (secs): 12.18 Iterations/Sec : 985.221675 Iterations : 12000 Compiler version : GCC8.4.0 Compiler flags : -O3 -fno-strict-aliasing -fomit-frame-pointer -ffunction-sections -fdata-sections Parallel PThreads : 2 Memory location : Stack seedcrc : 0xe9f5 [0]crclist : 0xe714 [1]crclist : 0xe714 [0]crcmatrix : 0x1fd7 [1]crcmatrix : 0x1fd7 [0]crcstate : 0x8e3a [1]crcstate : 0x8e3a [0]crcfinal : 0xa14c [1]crcfinal : 0xa14c Correct operation validated. See README.md for run and reporting rules. CoreMark 1.0 : 985.221675 / GCC8.4.0 -O3 -fno-strict-aliasing -fomit-frame-pointer -ffunction-sections -fdata-sections / Stack / 2:PThreads 1.2. NSH (OK) gmake distclean ./tools/configure.sh -B esp32-devkitc:nsh gmake gmake flash ESPTOOL_PORT=/dev/cuaU0 ESPTOOL_BAUD=115200 cu -l /dev/cuaU0 -s 115200 rst:0x1 (POWERON_RESET),boot:0x13 (SPI_FAST_FLASH_BOOT) configsip: 0, SPIWP:0xee clk_drv:0x00,q_drv:0x00,d_drv:0x00,cs0_drv:0x00,hd_drv:0x00,wp_drv:0x00 mode:DIO, clock div:2 load:0x3fff0030,len:5656 load:0x40078000,len:12696 load:0x40080400,len:4292 entry 0x400806b0 NuttShell (NSH) NuttX-12.1.0 nsh> uname -a NuttX 12.1.0 d40f4032fc-dirty Apr 12 2023 04:26:43 xtensa esp32-devkitc nsh> exit ~ [EOT] 2. SIM (build error in nsh) 2.1. ostest (OK) gmake distclean ./tools/configure.sh -B sim:ostest gmake ./nuttx stdio_test: write fd=1 stdio_test: Standard I/O Check: printf stdio_test: write fd=2 stdio_test: Standard I/O Check: fprintf to stderr ostest_main: putenv(Variable1=BadValue3) ostest_main: setenv(Variable1, GoodValue1, TRUE) ostest_main: setenv(Variable2, BadValue1, FALSE) ostest_main: setenv(Variable2, GoodValue2, TRUE) ostest_main: setenv(Variable3, GoodValue3, FALSE) ostest_main: setenv(Variable3, BadValue2, FALSE) show_variable: Variable=Variable1 has value=GoodValue1 show_variable: Variable=Variable2 has value=GoodValue2 show_variable: Variable=Variable3 has value=GoodValue3 ostest_main: Started user_main at PID=4 user_main: Begin argument test user_main: Started with argc=5 user_main: argv[0]="ostest" user_main: argv[1]="Arg1" user_main: argv[2]="Arg2" user_main: argv[3]="Arg3" user_main: argv[4]="Arg4" End of test memory usage: VARIABLE BEFORE AFTER arena 3fffd80 3fffd80 ordblks 22 mxordblk 3fb9a40 3fb9a40 uordblks4631046310 fordblks 3fb9a70 3fb9a70 user_main: getopt() test getopt(): Simple test getopt(): Invalid argument getopt(): Missing optional argument getopt_long(): Simple test getopt_long(): No short options getopt_long(): Argument for --option=argument getopt_long(): Invalid long option getopt_long(): Mixed long and short options getopt_long(): Invalid short option getopt_long(): Missing optional arguments getopt_long_only(): Mixed long and short options getopt_long_only(): Single hyphen long options 2.2. nsh (ERROR undefined symbol: backtrace) gmake clean distclean ./tools/configure.sh -B sim:nsh Copy files Select CONFIG_HOST_BSD=y Refreshing... CP: arch/dummy/Kconfig to /zraid/data/XXX/nuttxworkspace.git/nuttx/arch/dummy/dummy_kconfig CP: boards/dummy/Kconfig to /XXX/nuttxworkspace.git/nuttx/boards/dummy/dummy_kconfig LN: platform/board to /XXX/nuttxworkspace.git/apps/platform/dummy LN: include/arch to arch/sim/include LN: include/arch/board to /XXX/nuttxworkspace.git/nuttx/boards/sim/sim/sim/include LN: drivers/platform to /XXX/nuttxworkspace.git/nuttx/drivers/dummy LN: include/arch/chip to /XXX/nuttxworkspace.git/nuttx/arch/sim/include/sim LN: arch/sim/src/chip to /XXX/nuttxworkspace.git/nuttx/arch/sim/src/sim LN: arch/sim/src/board to /XXX/nuttxworkspace.git/nuttx/boards/sim/sim/sim/src mkkconfig in /XXX/nuttxworkspace.git/apps/audioutils mkkconfig in /XXX/nuttxworkspace.git/apps/benchmarks mkkconfig in /XXX/nuttxworkspace.git/apps/boot mkkconfig in /XXX/nuttxworkspace.git/apps/canutils mkkconfig in /XXX/nuttxworkspace.git/apps/crypto mkkconfig in /XXX/nuttxworkspace.git/apps/examples/mcuboot mkkconfig in /XXX/nuttxworkspace.git/apps/examples mkkconfig in /XXX/nuttxworkspace.git/apps/fsutils mkkconfig in
Re: [VOTE] Apache NuttX 12.1.0 RC0 release
+1 for PinePhone = Compiler + aarch64-none-elf-gcc -v Using built-in specs. COLLECT_GCC=aarch64-none-elf-gcc COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=/Applications/ArmGNUToolchain/11.3.rel1/aarch64-none-elf/bin/../libexec/gcc/aarch64-none-elf/11.3.1/lto-wrapper Target: aarch64-none-elf Configured with: /Volumes/data/jenkins/workspace/GNU-toolchain/arm-11/src/gcc/configure --target=aarch64-none-elf --prefix=/Volumes/data/jenkins/workspace/GNU-toolchain/arm-11/build-aarch64-none-elf/install --with-gmp=/Volumes/data/jenkins/workspace/GNU-toolchain/arm-11/build-aarch64-none-elf/host-tools --with-mpfr=/Volumes/data/jenkins/workspace/GNU-toolchain/arm-11/build-aarch64-none-elf/host-tools --with-mpc=/Volumes/data/jenkins/workspace/GNU-toolchain/arm-11/build-aarch64-none-elf/host-tools --with-isl=/Volumes/data/jenkins/workspace/GNU-toolchain/arm-11/build-aarch64-none-elf/host-tools --disable-shared --disable-nls --disable-threads --disable-tls --enable-checking=release --enable-languages=c,c++,fortran --with-newlib --with-gnu-as --with-gnu-ld --with-sysroot=/Volumes/data/jenkins/workspace/GNU-toolchain/arm-11/build-aarch64-none-elf/install/aarch64-none-elf --with-pkgversion='Arm GNU Toolchain 11.3.Rel1' --with-bugurl= https://bugs.linaro.org/ Thread model: single Supported LTO compression algorithms: zlib gcc version 11.3.1 20220712 (Arm GNU Toolchain 11.3.Rel1) = Configuration + ./tools/configure.sh pinephone:nsh = Size + aarch64-none-elf-size nuttx text databssdechex filename 218576 12897 41575 273048 42a98 nuttx = NSH Info and Free NuttShell (NSH) NuttX-12.1.0 nsh> name -a NuttX 12.1.0 d40f4032fc Apr 12 2023 07:11:20 arm64 pinephone nsh> free total used freelargest nused nfree Umem: 133414240 550768 132863472 132863376 56 2 Complete Log: https://gist.github.com/lupyuen/5760e0375d44a06b3c730a10614e4d24 Validation Script: https://gist.github.com/lupyuen/a08d3d478beefc5a492ed2dae39438f3 Lup On Tue, Apr 11, 2023 at 4:52 PM Alin Jerpelea wrote: > Hello all, > Apache NuttX 12.1.0 RC0 has been staged under [1] and it's > time to vote on accepting it for release. Voting will be open for 72hr. > > A minimum of 3 binding +1 votes and more binding +1 than binding -1 are > required to pass. > > The Apache requirements for approving a release can be found here [3] > "Before voting +1 [P]PMC members are required to download the signed > source code package, compile it as provided, and test the resulting > executable on their own platform, along with also verifying that the > package meets the requirements of the ASF policy on releases." > > A document to walk through some of this process has been published on > our project wiki and can be found here [4]. > > [ ] +1 accept (indicate what you validated - e.g. performed the non-RM > items in [4]) > [ ] -1 reject (explanation required) > > Thank you all, > Alin Jerpelea > > SCM Information: > Release tag: nuttx-12.1.0-RC0 > Hash for the release nuttx tag: d40f4032fc5491d2aeb9fde37042a5be9eabeb15 > Hash for the release nuttx-apps tag: > 125cf7abe2d7f345c3bc58c0bdea2360fdefa170 > > [1] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/nuttx/12.1.0-RC0/ > [2] > https://raw.githubusercontent.com/apache/nuttx/nuttx-12.1.0-RC0/ReleaseNotes > [3] https://www.apache.org/dev/release.html#approving-a-release > [4] > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NUTTX/Validating+a+staged+Release >
