Fwd: Re: svn commit: r1849514 - /ofbiz/ofbiz-framework/trunk/applications/order/minilang/order/OrderServices.xml

2018-12-22 Thread Jacques Le Roux
Message transféré Sujet : Re: svn commit: r1849514 - /ofbiz/ofbiz-framework/trunk/applications/order/minilang/order/OrderServices.xml Date : Sat, 22 Dec 2018 10:49:07 +0100 De :Jacques Le Roux Organisation : Les Arts Informatiques Pour : comm...@ofbiz.apache.org

Re: svn commit: r1849518 - in /ofbiz/ofbiz-framework/trunk/applications/party: servicedef/services_view.xml src/main/java/org/apache/ofbiz/party/party/PartyServices.java widget/partymgr/PartyForms.xml

2018-12-22 Thread Jacques Le Roux
Hi Suraj, Please put an explanation in your comments Thanks Jacques Le 22/12/2018 à 06:40, sur...@apache.org a écrit : Author: surajk Date: Sat Dec 22 05:40:47 2018 New Revision: 1849518 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1849518=rev Log: Fixed: Classification group filter not working on

Re: svn commit: r1849522 - in /ofbiz/ofbiz-framework/trunk/applications/product: config/ProductUiLabels.xml widget/catalog/ConfigForms.xml

2018-12-22 Thread Suraj Khurana
Done. Thanks Jacques. -- Best Regards, Suraj Khurana Technical Consultant On Sat, Dec 22, 2018 at 4:34 PM Jacques Le Roux < jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com> wrote: > Hi Suraj, > > Please put an explanation in your comments > > Thanks > > Jacques > > Le 22/12/2018 à

Re: svn commit: r1849528 - in /ofbiz/ofbiz-framework/trunk/applications/workeffort: minilang/workeffort/WorkEffortSimpleServices.xml widget/WorkEffortForms.xml

2018-12-22 Thread Jacques Le Roux
Hi Akash, Thanks for your (1st if Im' not wrong) contribution We decided to use this pattern when filling a commit comment (picking the status fitting): Improved: Fixed: Implemented: Documented: Completed: Reverted: (OFBIZ-) Explanation Thanks: Also we try to keep our lines under 80 chars I

Re: svn commit: r1849522 - in /ofbiz/ofbiz-framework/trunk/applications/product: config/ProductUiLabels.xml widget/catalog/ConfigForms.xml

2018-12-22 Thread Jacques Le Roux
Hi Suraj, Please put an explanation in your comments Thanks Jacques Le 22/12/2018 à 08:04, sur...@apache.org a écrit : Author: surajk Date: Sat Dec 22 07:04:38 2018 New Revision: 1849522 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1849522=rev Log: Fixed: Wrong title in table header of Config

Re: [DISCUSSION] Back porting: Remove all the fk dependencies from stats entities to the business entities

2018-12-22 Thread Aditya Sharma
Thanks Deepak :) With no conflicts yet done at r1849541 for R16.11. Thanks and Regards, *Aditya Sharma* | Enterprise Software Engineer HotWax Commerce by HotWax Systems [image: https://www.linkedin.com/in/aditya-p-sharma/]

Re: svn commit: r1849514 - /ofbiz/ofbiz-framework/trunk/applications/order/minilang/order/OrderServices.xml

2018-12-22 Thread Jacques Le Roux
BTW I did it only in trunk, I think it's enough for history... Le 22/12/2018 à 10:49, Jacques Le Roux a écrit : Hi Suraj, Please put an explanation in your comments, I  just did it for you :) Thanks Jacques Le 22/12/2018 à 05:55, sur...@apache.org a écrit : Author: surajk Date: Sat Dec 22

Re: Demo stable down

2018-12-22 Thread Jacques Le Roux
It was not a Montastic issue. I used my Apache email address and I guess it gets filtered out It works with my personal  address, I'll use that for now Jacques Le 19/12/2018 à 10:05, Jacques Le Roux a écrit : I must add that, as I said at https://markmail.org/message/g7rucybrfs724qt2, I use

Re: svn commit: r1849528 - in /ofbiz/ofbiz-framework/trunk/applications/workeffort: minilang/workeffort/WorkEffortSimpleServices.xml widget/WorkEffortForms.xml

2018-12-22 Thread Akash Jain
Thanks, Jacques! Thanks and Regards -- Akash Jain On Sat, Dec 22, 2018 at 4:33 PM Jacques Le Roux < jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com> wrote: > Hi Akash, > > Thanks for your (1st if Im' not wrong) contribution > > We decided to use this pattern when filling a commit comment (picking the > status

Re: svn commit: r1849514 - /ofbiz/ofbiz-framework/trunk/applications/order/minilang/order/OrderServices.xml

2018-12-22 Thread Suraj Khurana
Yes, I think its fine. Thanks Jacques. -- Best Regards, Suraj Khurana Technical Consultant On Sat, Dec 22, 2018 at 3:34 PM Jacques Le Roux < jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com> wrote: > BTW I did it only in trunk, I think it's enough for history... > > Le 22/12/2018 à

Re: OFBiz as Marketplace

2018-12-22 Thread Ratnesh Upadhyay
Greetings to All, FYI, we have started preparing user stories for marketplace and planning to locate them at Home > Documentation > OFBiz Features > Proposed Features > Marketplace. Suggestions are always welcome. Thanks! Regards, Ratnesh Upadhyay HotWax Systems | www.hotwaxsystems.com On Sat,

Re: Plan for Releasing 17.12 branch

2018-12-22 Thread Michael Brohl
I see 56 issues to do with https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/OFBIZ/versions/12338772 Thanks, Michael Am 19.12.18 um 11:51 schrieb Deepak Dixit: I think we should start prepration for this as well. Three are total 32 issues with 17.12 as affected verstion.

Re: svn commit: r1849547 - in /ofbiz/ofbiz-framework/trunk/applications/datamodel: data/demo/ data/seed/ entitydef/

2018-12-22 Thread Jacques Le Roux
Hi Arun, I did not have enough time test, but I guess it's an excellent work I though think a short explanation with a reference to OFBIZ-6964 would fit here. Like, Here are high level design notes based on the requirement specified under OFBIZ-7355  to support the product level

Re: svn commit: r1849540 - /ofbiz/ofbiz-framework/trunk/framework/widget/src/main/java/org/apache/ofbiz/widget/model/ModelFormField.java

2018-12-22 Thread Jacques Le Roux
Hi Akash, Again a bit of explanation would fit here. Like why from 10 to 9. Even if it's obvious when you look at it now, it could help later if another date format pose a problem (the earth is wide) Thanks Jacques Le 22/12/2018 à 12:26, akashj...@apache.org a écrit : Author: akashjain

Re: svn commit: r1849518 - in /ofbiz/ofbiz-framework/trunk/applications/party: servicedef/services_view.xml src/main/java/org/apache/ofbiz/party/party/PartyServices.java widget/partymgr/PartyForms.xml

2018-12-22 Thread Suraj Khurana
Done. Thanks Jacques. -- Best Regards, Suraj Khurana Technical Consultant On Sat, Dec 22, 2018 at 4:24 PM Jacques Le Roux < jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com> wrote: > Hi Suraj, > > Please put an explanation in your comments > > Thanks > > Jacques > > Le 22/12/2018 à 06:40, sur...@apache.org a écrit