Re: OFBiz Statistics in monthly blog entries

2019-05-21 Thread Rishi Solanki
This is great Pierre, thank you for your effort.

Best Regards,
--
*Rishi Solanki* | Sr Manager, Enterprise Software Development
HotWax Systems 
Linkedin: *Rishi Solanki*

Direct: +91-9893287847


On Mon, May 20, 2019 at 12:24 PM Pierre Smits 
wrote:

> I have corrected the settings on the 'Average Time in Status' chart.
>
> Best regards,
>
> Pierre Smits
>
> *Apache Trafodion , Vice President*
> *Apache Directory , PMC Member*
> Apache Incubator , committer
> *Apache OFBiz , contributor (without privileges)
> since 2008*
> Apache Steve , committer
>
>
> On Mon, May 20, 2019 at 8:27 AM Jacques Le Roux <
> jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com> wrote:
>
> > That's quite interesting thanks Pierre.
> >
> > Should we not get rid of "Average Time in Status: OFBiz"? Seems useless,
> > no data there.
> >
> > Jacques
> >
> > Le 20/05/2019 à 08:16, Aditya Sharma a écrit :
> > > Indeed! Looks Great. Thanks Pierre for your efforts. We will see to it
> if
> > > we can utilize some information from it.
> > >
> > > Thanks and Regards,
> > > *Aditya Sharma* | Enterprise Software Engineer
> > > HotWax Systems 
> > > Plot no. 80, Scheme no. 78 Part 2, Near Brilliant Convention Center,
> > Indore,
> > > M.P 452010
> > > Linkedin: *Aditya Sharma* <
> https://www.linkedin.com/in/aditya-p-sharma/>
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Mon, May 20, 2019 at 10:30 AM Pritam Kute <
> > pritam.k...@hotwaxsystems.com>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > >> That's cool Pierre. Thanks for your efforts.
> > >>
> > >> Kind Regards,
> > >> --
> > >> Pritam Kute
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> On Sat, May 18, 2019 at 12:37 PM Pierre Smits  >
> > >> wrote:
> > >>
> > >>> Hi all,
> > >>>
> > >>> I finally got an OFBiz dashboard working. See
> > >>>
> > >>
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Dashboard.jspa?selectPageId=12310603
> > >>> Best regards,
> > >>>
> > >>> Pierre Smits
> > >>>
> > >>> *Apache Trafodion , Vice President*
> > >>> *Apache Directory , PMC Member*
> > >>> Apache Incubator , committer
> > >>> *Apache OFBiz , contributor (without
> > >> privileges)
> > >>> since 2008*
> > >>> Apache Steve , committer
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> On Mon, May 6, 2019 at 9:22 AM Aditya Sharma <
> adityasha...@apache.org>
> > >>> wrote:
> > >>>
> >  Thank you Suraj for your input!
> > 
> >  Thank you Jacques for sharing the insights.
> > 
> >  Thank you Pierre for your inputs. Initially, we will be adding basic
> >  statistics (just like February 2018 blog) but definitely, we will
> look
> > >>> into
> >  the possibility of enriching it with more useful information.
> > 
> >  Thank you Sharan for your inputs. We will definitely ensure that it
> > >>> doesn't
> >  get into that direction. Thank you for your efforts in Kibble.
> Indeed,
> > >>> It's
> >  an amazing tool.
> > 
> >  --
> >  Thanks and Regards,
> >  Aditya Sharma
> > 
> >  On Sun, May 5, 2019 at 4:57 PM Pierre Smits  >
> >  wrote:
> > 
> > > I truly appreciate initiatives like kibble, the various reporter
> >  functions
> > > and other stuff that work towards showing the health of projects.
> > > Unfortunately these initiatives still have miles to go towards
> > >>> providing
> > > more meaning. Showing number of tickets opened and closed is nice,
> > >> but
> >  that
> > > has been available since the availability of JIRA. Showing the
> number
> > >>> of
> > > mails threads started (and or continued) and number of people
> > >> involved
> > >>> is
> > > also nice.
> > >
> > > But what I deem more important are the various engagement factors
> > >> when
> > > talking about the health of the project, like
> > >
> > > - when looking at the number of subscribers per mailing list,
> how
> > >> is
> >  the
> > > diversity (meaning how many PMC Members, Committers,
> > >> non-privileged
> > > contributors and others have subscribed);
> > > - when looking the threads per mailing list, how is the
> diversity
> >  among
> > > the participants - and who are in the top 5/10 of each segment
> > >>> (again
> > > PMC
> > > Member, Committers, no-privileged contributors)
> > > - When looking at tickets and commits, again showing insights
> per
> > > diversity segments and interactions between ;
> > >
> > >
> > > I would say all the data is there, yet very much still in silos.
> > >
> > > Best regards,
> > >
> > > Pierre Smits
> > >
> > > *Apache Trafodion , Vice President*
> > 

Re: OFBiz Statistics in monthly blog entries

2019-05-20 Thread Pierre Smits
I have corrected the settings on the 'Average Time in Status' chart.

Best regards,

Pierre Smits

*Apache Trafodion , Vice President*
*Apache Directory , PMC Member*
Apache Incubator , committer
*Apache OFBiz , contributor (without privileges)
since 2008*
Apache Steve , committer


On Mon, May 20, 2019 at 8:27 AM Jacques Le Roux <
jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com> wrote:

> That's quite interesting thanks Pierre.
>
> Should we not get rid of "Average Time in Status: OFBiz"? Seems useless,
> no data there.
>
> Jacques
>
> Le 20/05/2019 à 08:16, Aditya Sharma a écrit :
> > Indeed! Looks Great. Thanks Pierre for your efforts. We will see to it if
> > we can utilize some information from it.
> >
> > Thanks and Regards,
> > *Aditya Sharma* | Enterprise Software Engineer
> > HotWax Systems 
> > Plot no. 80, Scheme no. 78 Part 2, Near Brilliant Convention Center,
> Indore,
> > M.P 452010
> > Linkedin: *Aditya Sharma* 
> >
> >
> >
> > On Mon, May 20, 2019 at 10:30 AM Pritam Kute <
> pritam.k...@hotwaxsystems.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> That's cool Pierre. Thanks for your efforts.
> >>
> >> Kind Regards,
> >> --
> >> Pritam Kute
> >>
> >>
> >> On Sat, May 18, 2019 at 12:37 PM Pierre Smits 
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Hi all,
> >>>
> >>> I finally got an OFBiz dashboard working. See
> >>>
> >>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Dashboard.jspa?selectPageId=12310603
> >>> Best regards,
> >>>
> >>> Pierre Smits
> >>>
> >>> *Apache Trafodion , Vice President*
> >>> *Apache Directory , PMC Member*
> >>> Apache Incubator , committer
> >>> *Apache OFBiz , contributor (without
> >> privileges)
> >>> since 2008*
> >>> Apache Steve , committer
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On Mon, May 6, 2019 at 9:22 AM Aditya Sharma 
> >>> wrote:
> >>>
>  Thank you Suraj for your input!
> 
>  Thank you Jacques for sharing the insights.
> 
>  Thank you Pierre for your inputs. Initially, we will be adding basic
>  statistics (just like February 2018 blog) but definitely, we will look
> >>> into
>  the possibility of enriching it with more useful information.
> 
>  Thank you Sharan for your inputs. We will definitely ensure that it
> >>> doesn't
>  get into that direction. Thank you for your efforts in Kibble. Indeed,
> >>> It's
>  an amazing tool.
> 
>  --
>  Thanks and Regards,
>  Aditya Sharma
> 
>  On Sun, May 5, 2019 at 4:57 PM Pierre Smits 
>  wrote:
> 
> > I truly appreciate initiatives like kibble, the various reporter
>  functions
> > and other stuff that work towards showing the health of projects.
> > Unfortunately these initiatives still have miles to go towards
> >>> providing
> > more meaning. Showing number of tickets opened and closed is nice,
> >> but
>  that
> > has been available since the availability of JIRA. Showing the number
> >>> of
> > mails threads started (and or continued) and number of people
> >> involved
> >>> is
> > also nice.
> >
> > But what I deem more important are the various engagement factors
> >> when
> > talking about the health of the project, like
> >
> > - when looking at the number of subscribers per mailing list, how
> >> is
>  the
> > diversity (meaning how many PMC Members, Committers,
> >> non-privileged
> > contributors and others have subscribed);
> > - when looking the threads per mailing list, how is the diversity
>  among
> > the participants - and who are in the top 5/10 of each segment
> >>> (again
> > PMC
> > Member, Committers, no-privileged contributors)
> > - When looking at tickets and commits, again showing insights per
> > diversity segments and interactions between ;
> >
> >
> > I would say all the data is there, yet very much still in silos.
> >
> > Best regards,
> >
> > Pierre Smits
> >
> > *Apache Trafodion , Vice President*
> > *Apache Directory , PMC Member*
> > Apache Incubator , committer
> > *Apache OFBiz , contributor (without
>  privileges)
> > since 2008*
> > Apache Steve , committer
> >
> >
> > On Sun, May 5, 2019 at 12:19 PM Jacques Le Roux <
> > jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com> wrote:
> >
> >> Le 05/05/2019 à 11:58, Sharan Foga a écrit :
> >>> You can probably see that I'm a little Kibble focussed at the
>  moment:-)
> >>> Thanks
> >>> Sharan
> >> Yes I know that Sharan, I also follow Kibble

Re: OFBiz Statistics in monthly blog entries

2019-05-20 Thread Jacques Le Roux

That's quite interesting thanks Pierre.

Should we not get rid of "Average Time in Status: OFBiz"? Seems useless, no 
data there.

Jacques

Le 20/05/2019 à 08:16, Aditya Sharma a écrit :

Indeed! Looks Great. Thanks Pierre for your efforts. We will see to it if
we can utilize some information from it.

Thanks and Regards,
*Aditya Sharma* | Enterprise Software Engineer
HotWax Systems 
Plot no. 80, Scheme no. 78 Part 2, Near Brilliant Convention Center, Indore,
M.P 452010
Linkedin: *Aditya Sharma* 



On Mon, May 20, 2019 at 10:30 AM Pritam Kute 
wrote:


That's cool Pierre. Thanks for your efforts.

Kind Regards,
--
Pritam Kute


On Sat, May 18, 2019 at 12:37 PM Pierre Smits 
wrote:


Hi all,

I finally got an OFBiz dashboard working. See


https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Dashboard.jspa?selectPageId=12310603

Best regards,

Pierre Smits

*Apache Trafodion , Vice President*
*Apache Directory , PMC Member*
Apache Incubator , committer
*Apache OFBiz , contributor (without

privileges)

since 2008*
Apache Steve , committer


On Mon, May 6, 2019 at 9:22 AM Aditya Sharma 
wrote:


Thank you Suraj for your input!

Thank you Jacques for sharing the insights.

Thank you Pierre for your inputs. Initially, we will be adding basic
statistics (just like February 2018 blog) but definitely, we will look

into

the possibility of enriching it with more useful information.

Thank you Sharan for your inputs. We will definitely ensure that it

doesn't

get into that direction. Thank you for your efforts in Kibble. Indeed,

It's

an amazing tool.

--
Thanks and Regards,
Aditya Sharma

On Sun, May 5, 2019 at 4:57 PM Pierre Smits 
wrote:


I truly appreciate initiatives like kibble, the various reporter

functions

and other stuff that work towards showing the health of projects.
Unfortunately these initiatives still have miles to go towards

providing

more meaning. Showing number of tickets opened and closed is nice,

but

that

has been available since the availability of JIRA. Showing the number

of

mails threads started (and or continued) and number of people

involved

is

also nice.

But what I deem more important are the various engagement factors

when

talking about the health of the project, like

- when looking at the number of subscribers per mailing list, how

is

the

diversity (meaning how many PMC Members, Committers,

non-privileged

contributors and others have subscribed);
- when looking the threads per mailing list, how is the diversity

among

the participants - and who are in the top 5/10 of each segment

(again

PMC
Member, Committers, no-privileged contributors)
- When looking at tickets and commits, again showing insights per
diversity segments and interactions between ;


I would say all the data is there, yet very much still in silos.

Best regards,

Pierre Smits

*Apache Trafodion , Vice President*
*Apache Directory , PMC Member*
Apache Incubator , committer
*Apache OFBiz , contributor (without

privileges)

since 2008*
Apache Steve , committer


On Sun, May 5, 2019 at 12:19 PM Jacques Le Roux <
jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com> wrote:


Le 05/05/2019 à 11:58, Sharan Foga a écrit :

You can probably see that I'm a little Kibble focussed at the

moment:-)

Thanks
Sharan

Yes I know that Sharan, I also follow Kibble

Thanks for your efforts there and elsewhere :)

Jacques




Re: OFBiz Statistics in monthly blog entries

2019-05-20 Thread Aditya Sharma
Indeed! Looks Great. Thanks Pierre for your efforts. We will see to it if
we can utilize some information from it.

Thanks and Regards,
*Aditya Sharma* | Enterprise Software Engineer
HotWax Systems 
Plot no. 80, Scheme no. 78 Part 2, Near Brilliant Convention Center, Indore,
M.P 452010
Linkedin: *Aditya Sharma* 



On Mon, May 20, 2019 at 10:30 AM Pritam Kute 
wrote:

> That's cool Pierre. Thanks for your efforts.
>
> Kind Regards,
> --
> Pritam Kute
>
>
> On Sat, May 18, 2019 at 12:37 PM Pierre Smits 
> wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I finally got an OFBiz dashboard working. See
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Dashboard.jspa?selectPageId=12310603
> >
> > Best regards,
> >
> > Pierre Smits
> >
> > *Apache Trafodion , Vice President*
> > *Apache Directory , PMC Member*
> > Apache Incubator , committer
> > *Apache OFBiz , contributor (without
> privileges)
> > since 2008*
> > Apache Steve , committer
> >
> >
> > On Mon, May 6, 2019 at 9:22 AM Aditya Sharma 
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Thank you Suraj for your input!
> > >
> > > Thank you Jacques for sharing the insights.
> > >
> > > Thank you Pierre for your inputs. Initially, we will be adding basic
> > > statistics (just like February 2018 blog) but definitely, we will look
> > into
> > > the possibility of enriching it with more useful information.
> > >
> > > Thank you Sharan for your inputs. We will definitely ensure that it
> > doesn't
> > > get into that direction. Thank you for your efforts in Kibble. Indeed,
> > It's
> > > an amazing tool.
> > >
> > > --
> > > Thanks and Regards,
> > > Aditya Sharma
> > >
> > > On Sun, May 5, 2019 at 4:57 PM Pierre Smits 
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > I truly appreciate initiatives like kibble, the various reporter
> > > functions
> > > > and other stuff that work towards showing the health of projects.
> > > > Unfortunately these initiatives still have miles to go towards
> > providing
> > > > more meaning. Showing number of tickets opened and closed is nice,
> but
> > > that
> > > > has been available since the availability of JIRA. Showing the number
> > of
> > > > mails threads started (and or continued) and number of people
> involved
> > is
> > > > also nice.
> > > >
> > > > But what I deem more important are the various engagement factors
> when
> > > > talking about the health of the project, like
> > > >
> > > >- when looking at the number of subscribers per mailing list, how
> is
> > > the
> > > >diversity (meaning how many PMC Members, Committers,
> non-privileged
> > > >contributors and others have subscribed);
> > > >- when looking the threads per mailing list, how is the diversity
> > > among
> > > >the participants - and who are in the top 5/10 of each segment
> > (again
> > > > PMC
> > > >Member, Committers, no-privileged contributors)
> > > >- When looking at tickets and commits, again showing insights per
> > > >diversity segments and interactions between ;
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > I would say all the data is there, yet very much still in silos.
> > > >
> > > > Best regards,
> > > >
> > > > Pierre Smits
> > > >
> > > > *Apache Trafodion , Vice President*
> > > > *Apache Directory , PMC Member*
> > > > Apache Incubator , committer
> > > > *Apache OFBiz , contributor (without
> > > privileges)
> > > > since 2008*
> > > > Apache Steve , committer
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Sun, May 5, 2019 at 12:19 PM Jacques Le Roux <
> > > > jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Le 05/05/2019 à 11:58, Sharan Foga a écrit :
> > > > > > You can probably see that I'm a little Kibble focussed at the
> > > moment:-)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Thanks
> > > > > > Sharan
> > > > >
> > > > > Yes I know that Sharan, I also follow Kibble
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks for your efforts there and elsewhere :)
> > > > >
> > > > > Jacques
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>


Re: OFBiz Statistics in monthly blog entries

2019-05-19 Thread Pritam Kute
That's cool Pierre. Thanks for your efforts.

Kind Regards,
--
Pritam Kute


On Sat, May 18, 2019 at 12:37 PM Pierre Smits 
wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> I finally got an OFBiz dashboard working. See
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Dashboard.jspa?selectPageId=12310603
>
> Best regards,
>
> Pierre Smits
>
> *Apache Trafodion , Vice President*
> *Apache Directory , PMC Member*
> Apache Incubator , committer
> *Apache OFBiz , contributor (without privileges)
> since 2008*
> Apache Steve , committer
>
>
> On Mon, May 6, 2019 at 9:22 AM Aditya Sharma 
> wrote:
>
> > Thank you Suraj for your input!
> >
> > Thank you Jacques for sharing the insights.
> >
> > Thank you Pierre for your inputs. Initially, we will be adding basic
> > statistics (just like February 2018 blog) but definitely, we will look
> into
> > the possibility of enriching it with more useful information.
> >
> > Thank you Sharan for your inputs. We will definitely ensure that it
> doesn't
> > get into that direction. Thank you for your efforts in Kibble. Indeed,
> It's
> > an amazing tool.
> >
> > --
> > Thanks and Regards,
> > Aditya Sharma
> >
> > On Sun, May 5, 2019 at 4:57 PM Pierre Smits 
> > wrote:
> >
> > > I truly appreciate initiatives like kibble, the various reporter
> > functions
> > > and other stuff that work towards showing the health of projects.
> > > Unfortunately these initiatives still have miles to go towards
> providing
> > > more meaning. Showing number of tickets opened and closed is nice, but
> > that
> > > has been available since the availability of JIRA. Showing the number
> of
> > > mails threads started (and or continued) and number of people involved
> is
> > > also nice.
> > >
> > > But what I deem more important are the various engagement factors when
> > > talking about the health of the project, like
> > >
> > >- when looking at the number of subscribers per mailing list, how is
> > the
> > >diversity (meaning how many PMC Members, Committers, non-privileged
> > >contributors and others have subscribed);
> > >- when looking the threads per mailing list, how is the diversity
> > among
> > >the participants - and who are in the top 5/10 of each segment
> (again
> > > PMC
> > >Member, Committers, no-privileged contributors)
> > >- When looking at tickets and commits, again showing insights per
> > >diversity segments and interactions between ;
> > >
> > >
> > > I would say all the data is there, yet very much still in silos.
> > >
> > > Best regards,
> > >
> > > Pierre Smits
> > >
> > > *Apache Trafodion , Vice President*
> > > *Apache Directory , PMC Member*
> > > Apache Incubator , committer
> > > *Apache OFBiz , contributor (without
> > privileges)
> > > since 2008*
> > > Apache Steve , committer
> > >
> > >
> > > On Sun, May 5, 2019 at 12:19 PM Jacques Le Roux <
> > > jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Le 05/05/2019 à 11:58, Sharan Foga a écrit :
> > > > > You can probably see that I'm a little Kibble focussed at the
> > moment:-)
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks
> > > > > Sharan
> > > >
> > > > Yes I know that Sharan, I also follow Kibble
> > > >
> > > > Thanks for your efforts there and elsewhere :)
> > > >
> > > > Jacques
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>


Re: OFBiz Statistics in monthly blog entries

2019-05-18 Thread Pierre Smits
Hi all,

I finally got an OFBiz dashboard working. See
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Dashboard.jspa?selectPageId=12310603

Best regards,

Pierre Smits

*Apache Trafodion , Vice President*
*Apache Directory , PMC Member*
Apache Incubator , committer
*Apache OFBiz , contributor (without privileges)
since 2008*
Apache Steve , committer


On Mon, May 6, 2019 at 9:22 AM Aditya Sharma 
wrote:

> Thank you Suraj for your input!
>
> Thank you Jacques for sharing the insights.
>
> Thank you Pierre for your inputs. Initially, we will be adding basic
> statistics (just like February 2018 blog) but definitely, we will look into
> the possibility of enriching it with more useful information.
>
> Thank you Sharan for your inputs. We will definitely ensure that it doesn't
> get into that direction. Thank you for your efforts in Kibble. Indeed, It's
> an amazing tool.
>
> --
> Thanks and Regards,
> Aditya Sharma
>
> On Sun, May 5, 2019 at 4:57 PM Pierre Smits 
> wrote:
>
> > I truly appreciate initiatives like kibble, the various reporter
> functions
> > and other stuff that work towards showing the health of projects.
> > Unfortunately these initiatives still have miles to go towards providing
> > more meaning. Showing number of tickets opened and closed is nice, but
> that
> > has been available since the availability of JIRA. Showing the number of
> > mails threads started (and or continued) and number of people involved is
> > also nice.
> >
> > But what I deem more important are the various engagement factors when
> > talking about the health of the project, like
> >
> >- when looking at the number of subscribers per mailing list, how is
> the
> >diversity (meaning how many PMC Members, Committers, non-privileged
> >contributors and others have subscribed);
> >- when looking the threads per mailing list, how is the diversity
> among
> >the participants - and who are in the top 5/10 of each segment (again
> > PMC
> >Member, Committers, no-privileged contributors)
> >- When looking at tickets and commits, again showing insights per
> >diversity segments and interactions between ;
> >
> >
> > I would say all the data is there, yet very much still in silos.
> >
> > Best regards,
> >
> > Pierre Smits
> >
> > *Apache Trafodion , Vice President*
> > *Apache Directory , PMC Member*
> > Apache Incubator , committer
> > *Apache OFBiz , contributor (without
> privileges)
> > since 2008*
> > Apache Steve , committer
> >
> >
> > On Sun, May 5, 2019 at 12:19 PM Jacques Le Roux <
> > jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Le 05/05/2019 à 11:58, Sharan Foga a écrit :
> > > > You can probably see that I'm a little Kibble focussed at the
> moment:-)
> > > >
> > > > Thanks
> > > > Sharan
> > >
> > > Yes I know that Sharan, I also follow Kibble
> > >
> > > Thanks for your efforts there and elsewhere :)
> > >
> > > Jacques
> > >
> > >
> >
>


Re: OFBiz Statistics in monthly blog entries

2019-05-06 Thread Aditya Sharma
Thank you Suraj for your input!

Thank you Jacques for sharing the insights.

Thank you Pierre for your inputs. Initially, we will be adding basic
statistics (just like February 2018 blog) but definitely, we will look into
the possibility of enriching it with more useful information.

Thank you Sharan for your inputs. We will definitely ensure that it doesn't
get into that direction. Thank you for your efforts in Kibble. Indeed, It's
an amazing tool.

--
Thanks and Regards,
Aditya Sharma

On Sun, May 5, 2019 at 4:57 PM Pierre Smits  wrote:

> I truly appreciate initiatives like kibble, the various reporter functions
> and other stuff that work towards showing the health of projects.
> Unfortunately these initiatives still have miles to go towards providing
> more meaning. Showing number of tickets opened and closed is nice, but that
> has been available since the availability of JIRA. Showing the number of
> mails threads started (and or continued) and number of people involved is
> also nice.
>
> But what I deem more important are the various engagement factors when
> talking about the health of the project, like
>
>- when looking at the number of subscribers per mailing list, how is the
>diversity (meaning how many PMC Members, Committers, non-privileged
>contributors and others have subscribed);
>- when looking the threads per mailing list, how is the diversity among
>the participants - and who are in the top 5/10 of each segment (again
> PMC
>Member, Committers, no-privileged contributors)
>- When looking at tickets and commits, again showing insights per
>diversity segments and interactions between ;
>
>
> I would say all the data is there, yet very much still in silos.
>
> Best regards,
>
> Pierre Smits
>
> *Apache Trafodion , Vice President*
> *Apache Directory , PMC Member*
> Apache Incubator , committer
> *Apache OFBiz , contributor (without privileges)
> since 2008*
> Apache Steve , committer
>
>
> On Sun, May 5, 2019 at 12:19 PM Jacques Le Roux <
> jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com> wrote:
>
> > Le 05/05/2019 à 11:58, Sharan Foga a écrit :
> > > You can probably see that I'm a little Kibble focussed at the moment:-)
> > >
> > > Thanks
> > > Sharan
> >
> > Yes I know that Sharan, I also follow Kibble
> >
> > Thanks for your efforts there and elsewhere :)
> >
> > Jacques
> >
> >
>


Re: OFBiz Statistics in monthly blog entries

2019-05-05 Thread Pierre Smits
I truly appreciate initiatives like kibble, the various reporter functions
and other stuff that work towards showing the health of projects.
Unfortunately these initiatives still have miles to go towards providing
more meaning. Showing number of tickets opened and closed is nice, but that
has been available since the availability of JIRA. Showing the number of
mails threads started (and or continued) and number of people involved is
also nice.

But what I deem more important are the various engagement factors when
talking about the health of the project, like

   - when looking at the number of subscribers per mailing list, how is the
   diversity (meaning how many PMC Members, Committers, non-privileged
   contributors and others have subscribed);
   - when looking the threads per mailing list, how is the diversity among
   the participants - and who are in the top 5/10 of each segment (again PMC
   Member, Committers, no-privileged contributors)
   - When looking at tickets and commits, again showing insights per
   diversity segments and interactions between ;


I would say all the data is there, yet very much still in silos.

Best regards,

Pierre Smits

*Apache Trafodion , Vice President*
*Apache Directory , PMC Member*
Apache Incubator , committer
*Apache OFBiz , contributor (without privileges)
since 2008*
Apache Steve , committer


On Sun, May 5, 2019 at 12:19 PM Jacques Le Roux <
jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com> wrote:

> Le 05/05/2019 à 11:58, Sharan Foga a écrit :
> > You can probably see that I'm a little Kibble focussed at the moment:-)
> >
> > Thanks
> > Sharan
>
> Yes I know that Sharan, I also follow Kibble
>
> Thanks for your efforts there and elsewhere :)
>
> Jacques
>
>


Re: OFBiz Statistics in monthly blog entries

2019-05-05 Thread Jacques Le Roux

Le 05/05/2019 à 11:58, Sharan Foga a écrit :

You can probably see that I'm a little Kibble focussed at the moment:-)

Thanks
Sharan


Yes I know that Sharan, I also follow Kibble

Thanks for your efforts there and elsewhere :)

Jacques



Re: OFBiz Statistics in monthly blog entries

2019-05-05 Thread Sharan Foga



On 2019/05/05 08:44:05, Jacques Le Roux  wrote: 
> Thanks Sharan, Pierre,
> 
> Anyway, even when using Kibble we will always need a human interpretation. 
> And that's when it begin to be more work.

+1 Jacques, you are exactly right!

Kibble is a tool like any other, it is not there to tell you what is definitely 
right or wrong. It uses rules to aggregate and visualise the data but it is up 
to people (i.e us:-) to make sense of it. We as the community have a better 
view of what is really happening here, so Kibble or (and AI) is there to assist 
us and maybe highlight areas that perhaps need more investigation.

You can probably see that I'm a little Kibble focussed at the moment :-)

Thanks
Sharan

> 
> Also, stats are driving the world and we see where it's going... I have 
> always preferred the logical branch of AI over the stats branch for this 
> reason. Achieving things in the world (yes stats do, or seem to do at least) 
> is not the only thing we should worry about.
> 
> But who am I to tell?  I trust you share my view, so... sorry for this Sunday 
> digression, I could not resist (again) :D
> 
> Jacques
> 
> PS: of course we know that nowadays the AI branches are all mixed to get 
> results. I still believe that as long as you instil stats in AI something 
> could go wrong.
> Disclaimer: my digression (for fun) is about AI, Kibble is not about AI
> 
> Le 05/05/2019 à 10:07, Pierre Smits a écrit :
> > If we're worried about creating a competition, or people gaming the
> > results, then reporting on a monthly basis may prove to be undesirable, and
> > it would then be better to report on a quarterly basis. Then the risk of
> > gaming the outcome should become less.
> >
> > Best regards,
> >
> > Pierre Smits
> >
> > *Apache Trafodion , Vice President*
> > *Apache Directory , PMC Member*
> > Apache Incubator , committer
> > *Apache OFBiz , contributor (without privileges)
> > since 2008*
> > Apache Steve , committer
> >
> >
> > On Sun, May 5, 2019 at 10:00 AM Sharan Foga  wrote:
> >
> >> Hi All
> >>
> >> +1
> >>
> >> I think we need to make sure that it doesn't become like a competition to
> >> beat the previous month's  scores, so  it might be good to rotate and use a
> >> range of indicators. The ones posted in the blog are mailing list and
> >> issues stats, but Kibble also shows what our mailing list mood is like, the
> >> number of newcomers to our community, our pony factor (bus factor), and
> >> also what are the main topics we are discussing. What I'm trying to say is
> >> it might be nice to mix it a bit so that we get different aspects of the
> >> community being reported.
> >>
> >> Thanks
> >> Sharan
> >>
> >> On 2019/05/03 10:34:03, Aditya Sharma  wrote:
> >>> Hi everyone,
> >>>
> >>> I think we should also add monthly statistics in Apache OFBiz blog
> >> entries.
> >>> In February 2018
> >>> 
> >> we
> >>> have added similar stats.
> >>>
> >>> These stats are already available with Apache Kibble demo
> >>>  instance
> >> setup.
> >>> WDYT?
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>> Thanks and regards,
> >>> Aditya Sharma
> >>>
> 


Re: OFBiz Statistics in monthly blog entries

2019-05-05 Thread Jacques Le Roux

Thanks Sharan, Pierre,

Anyway, even when using Kibble we will always need a human interpretation. And 
that's when it begin to be more work.

Also, stats are driving the world and we see where it's going... I have always preferred the logical branch of AI over the stats branch for this 
reason. Achieving things in the world (yes stats do, or seem to do at least) is not the only thing we should worry about.


But who am I to tell?  I trust you share my view, so... sorry for this Sunday 
digression, I could not resist (again) :D

Jacques

PS: of course we know that nowadays the AI branches are all mixed to get results. I still believe that as long as you instil stats in AI something 
could go wrong.

Disclaimer: my digression (for fun) is about AI, Kibble is not about AI

Le 05/05/2019 à 10:07, Pierre Smits a écrit :

If we're worried about creating a competition, or people gaming the
results, then reporting on a monthly basis may prove to be undesirable, and
it would then be better to report on a quarterly basis. Then the risk of
gaming the outcome should become less.

Best regards,

Pierre Smits

*Apache Trafodion , Vice President*
*Apache Directory , PMC Member*
Apache Incubator , committer
*Apache OFBiz , contributor (without privileges)
since 2008*
Apache Steve , committer


On Sun, May 5, 2019 at 10:00 AM Sharan Foga  wrote:


Hi All

+1

I think we need to make sure that it doesn't become like a competition to
beat the previous month's  scores, so  it might be good to rotate and use a
range of indicators. The ones posted in the blog are mailing list and
issues stats, but Kibble also shows what our mailing list mood is like, the
number of newcomers to our community, our pony factor (bus factor), and
also what are the main topics we are discussing. What I'm trying to say is
it might be nice to mix it a bit so that we get different aspects of the
community being reported.

Thanks
Sharan

On 2019/05/03 10:34:03, Aditya Sharma  wrote:

Hi everyone,

I think we should also add monthly statistics in Apache OFBiz blog

entries.

In February 2018


we

have added similar stats.

These stats are already available with Apache Kibble demo
 instance

setup.

WDYT?

--
Thanks and regards,
Aditya Sharma



Re: OFBiz Statistics in monthly blog entries

2019-05-05 Thread Jacques Le Roux

Hi Pierre,

Inline...

Le 05/05/2019 à 09:16, Pierre Smits a écrit :

+1 for communicating more stats about the health of the project, whether
that is monthly or quarterly. We had such in our quarterly reports up to
the one for the 2nd quarter of 2018. Unfortunately, IMO, for the wrong
reasons. If we can bring that back (and coincide with the quarterly report
of the project, I am all for it.


Yes, as long as stats are supported by interpretations. Anyway it's in the hand of the PMC chair. Except if s/he wants to (or must) temporarily 
delegate: https://www.apache.org/foundation/board/reporting





Which kind of stats are we thinking about pulling in and publishing?

I guess, as mentioned Aditya, see 
https://blogs.apache.org/ofbiz/entry/apache-ofbiz-news-february-2018



We have to keep in mind that what is delivered through the Kibble site is
not an ASF service (it is called demo.kibble for a reason), so there are no
guarantees regarding completeness and that it will last.


We can use it as a tool as long as it's available, if it disappears then we 
will see

Jacques




Best regards,

Pierre Smits

*Apache Trafodion , Vice President*
*Apache Directory , PMC Member*
Apache Incubator , committer
*Apache OFBiz , contributor (without privileges)
since 2008*
Apache Steve , committer


On Fri, May 3, 2019 at 12:34 PM Aditya Sharma 
wrote:


Hi everyone,

I think we should also add monthly statistics in Apache OFBiz blog entries.
In February 2018
 we
have added similar stats.

These stats are already available with Apache Kibble demo
 instance setup.

WDYT?

--
Thanks and regards,
Aditya Sharma



Re: OFBiz Statistics in monthly blog entries

2019-05-05 Thread Pierre Smits
If we're worried about creating a competition, or people gaming the
results, then reporting on a monthly basis may prove to be undesirable, and
it would then be better to report on a quarterly basis. Then the risk of
gaming the outcome should become less.

Best regards,

Pierre Smits

*Apache Trafodion , Vice President*
*Apache Directory , PMC Member*
Apache Incubator , committer
*Apache OFBiz , contributor (without privileges)
since 2008*
Apache Steve , committer


On Sun, May 5, 2019 at 10:00 AM Sharan Foga  wrote:

> Hi All
>
> +1
>
> I think we need to make sure that it doesn't become like a competition to
> beat the previous month's  scores, so  it might be good to rotate and use a
> range of indicators. The ones posted in the blog are mailing list and
> issues stats, but Kibble also shows what our mailing list mood is like, the
> number of newcomers to our community, our pony factor (bus factor), and
> also what are the main topics we are discussing. What I'm trying to say is
> it might be nice to mix it a bit so that we get different aspects of the
> community being reported.
>
> Thanks
> Sharan
>
> On 2019/05/03 10:34:03, Aditya Sharma  wrote:
> > Hi everyone,
> >
> > I think we should also add monthly statistics in Apache OFBiz blog
> entries.
> > In February 2018
> > 
> we
> > have added similar stats.
> >
> > These stats are already available with Apache Kibble demo
> >  instance
> setup.
> >
> > WDYT?
> >
> > --
> > Thanks and regards,
> > Aditya Sharma
> >
>


Re: OFBiz Statistics in monthly blog entries

2019-05-05 Thread Sharan Foga
Hi All

+1

I think we need to make sure that it doesn't become like a competition to beat 
the previous month's  scores, so  it might be good to rotate and use a range of 
indicators. The ones posted in the blog are mailing list and issues stats, but 
Kibble also shows what our mailing list mood is like, the number of newcomers 
to our community, our pony factor (bus factor), and also what are the main 
topics we are discussing. What I'm trying to say is it might be nice to mix it 
a bit so that we get different aspects of the community being reported.

Thanks
Sharan

On 2019/05/03 10:34:03, Aditya Sharma  wrote: 
> Hi everyone,
> 
> I think we should also add monthly statistics in Apache OFBiz blog entries.
> In February 2018
>  we
> have added similar stats.
> 
> These stats are already available with Apache Kibble demo
>  instance setup.
> 
> WDYT?
> 
> --
> Thanks and regards,
> Aditya Sharma
> 


Re: OFBiz Statistics in monthly blog entries

2019-05-05 Thread Pierre Smits
+1 for communicating more stats about the health of the project, whether
that is monthly or quarterly. We had such in our quarterly reports up to
the one for the 2nd quarter of 2018. Unfortunately, IMO, for the wrong
reasons. If we can bring that back (and coincide with the quarterly report
of the project, I am all for it.

Which kind of stats are we thinking about pulling in and publishing?

We have to keep in mind that what is delivered through the Kibble site is
not an ASF service (it is called demo.kibble for a reason), so there are no
guarantees regarding completeness and that it will last.

Best regards,

Pierre Smits

*Apache Trafodion , Vice President*
*Apache Directory , PMC Member*
Apache Incubator , committer
*Apache OFBiz , contributor (without privileges)
since 2008*
Apache Steve , committer


On Fri, May 3, 2019 at 12:34 PM Aditya Sharma 
wrote:

> Hi everyone,
>
> I think we should also add monthly statistics in Apache OFBiz blog entries.
> In February 2018
>  we
> have added similar stats.
>
> These stats are already available with Apache Kibble demo
>  instance setup.
>
> WDYT?
>
> --
> Thanks and regards,
> Aditya Sharma
>


Re: OFBiz Statistics in monthly blog entries

2019-05-04 Thread Jacques Le Roux

+1

Jacques

Le 03/05/2019 à 13:20, Suraj Khurana a écrit :

+1.

Sounds good to me.

--
Best Regards,
Suraj Khurana
Technical Consultant






On Fri, May 3, 2019 at 4:04 PM Aditya Sharma 
wrote:


Hi everyone,

I think we should also add monthly statistics in Apache OFBiz blog entries.
In February 2018
 we
have added similar stats.

These stats are already available with Apache Kibble demo
 instance setup.

WDYT?

--
Thanks and regards,
Aditya Sharma



Re: OFBiz Statistics in monthly blog entries

2019-05-03 Thread Suraj Khurana
+1.

Sounds good to me.

--
Best Regards,
Suraj Khurana
Technical Consultant






On Fri, May 3, 2019 at 4:04 PM Aditya Sharma 
wrote:

> Hi everyone,
>
> I think we should also add monthly statistics in Apache OFBiz blog entries.
> In February 2018
>  we
> have added similar stats.
>
> These stats are already available with Apache Kibble demo
>  instance setup.
>
> WDYT?
>
> --
> Thanks and regards,
> Aditya Sharma
>