Re: remove ant from ofbiz

2011-12-23 Thread Sascha Rodekamp
I would also prefer to add upgrade the embedded version. That make it
much easier for the user, he haven't to deal with a local ant
installation, that properly causes compatibility issues if the wrong
ant version is installed on the user machine...

But +1 for upgrading!

2011/12/22 Jacques Le Roux jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com:
 +1

 Jacques

 From: Jacopo Cappellato jacopo.cappell...@hotwaxmedia.com

 Hi Hans,

 what I don't like is that this will add a new system requirement for the
 user.
 Why not upgrading the embedded version instead?

 Jacopo

 On Dec 22, 2011, at 4:23 AM, Hans Bakker wrote:

 Hi community,

 the version of Ant distributed with ofbiz is pretty old and has some
 disadvantages:
 1. does not support the failonerror=true on te patch command
 2. difficult command line when using apply-ofbiz-patches:
   ../../ant apply-ofbiz-patches

 i tested using the ant version 1.8.2 and it seems to work fine.

 why not remove it and use the standard ant install?
 could still have the ant command to redirect to the external ant

 opinions please?

 regards,
 Hans







-- 

Sascha Rodekamp
    Visit the new german OFBiz Blog: http://www.ofbiz.biz
    Lynx-Consulting GmbH
    Johanniskirchplatz 6
    D-33615 Bielefeld
    http://www.lynx.de


Re: remove ant from ofbiz

2011-12-23 Thread Hans Bakker

You and others: you got it, upgraded today,

Regards Hans and employees of antwebsystems.


On 12/23/2011 03:41 PM, Sascha Rodekamp wrote:

I would also prefer to add upgrade the embedded version. That make it
much easier for the user, he haven't to deal with a local ant
installation, that properly causes compatibility issues if the wrong
ant version is installed on the user machine...

But +1 for upgrading!

2011/12/22 Jacques Le Rouxjacques.le.r...@les7arts.com:

+1

Jacques

From: Jacopo Cappellatojacopo.cappell...@hotwaxmedia.com


Hi Hans,

what I don't like is that this will add a new system requirement for the
user.
Why not upgrading the embedded version instead?

Jacopo

On Dec 22, 2011, at 4:23 AM, Hans Bakker wrote:


Hi community,

the version of Ant distributed with ofbiz is pretty old and has some
disadvantages:
1. does not support the failonerror=true on tepatch command
2. difficult command line when using apply-ofbiz-patches:
   ../../ant apply-ofbiz-patches

i tested using the ant version 1.8.2 and it seems to work fine.

why not remove it and use the standard ant install?
could still have the ant command to redirect to the external ant

opinions please?

regards,
Hans










Re: remove ant from ofbiz

2011-12-22 Thread Jacques Le Roux

+1

Jacques

From: Jacopo Cappellato jacopo.cappell...@hotwaxmedia.com

Hi Hans,

what I don't like is that this will add a new system requirement for the user.
Why not upgrading the embedded version instead?

Jacopo

On Dec 22, 2011, at 4:23 AM, Hans Bakker wrote:


Hi community,

the version of Ant distributed with ofbiz is pretty old and has some 
disadvantages:
1. does not support the failonerror=true on te patch command
2. difficult command line when using apply-ofbiz-patches:
   ../../ant apply-ofbiz-patches

i tested using the ant version 1.8.2 and it seems to work fine.

why not remove it and use the standard ant install?
could still have the ant command to redirect to the external ant

opinions please?

regards,
Hans





Re: remove ant from ofbiz

2011-12-21 Thread Jacopo Cappellato
Hi Hans,

what I don't like is that this will add a new system requirement for the user.
Why not upgrading the embedded version instead?

Jacopo

On Dec 22, 2011, at 4:23 AM, Hans Bakker wrote:

 Hi community,
 
 the version of Ant distributed with ofbiz is pretty old and has some 
 disadvantages:
 1. does not support the failonerror=true on te patch command
 2. difficult command line when using apply-ofbiz-patches:
../../ant apply-ofbiz-patches
 
 i tested using the ant version 1.8.2 and it seems to work fine.
 
 why not remove it and use the standard ant install?
 could still have the ant command to redirect to the external ant
 
 opinions please?
 
 regards,
 Hans



Re: remove ant from ofbiz

2011-12-21 Thread Hans Bakker
Looks like the best way also because Ubuntu 10.04 LTS by default 
installs ant 1.7 while 1.8 is needed.

Lets see what we can do here
Hans

On 12/22/2011 01:22 PM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote:

Hi Hans,

what I don't like is that this will add a new system requirement for the user.
Why not upgrading the embedded version instead?

Jacopo

On Dec 22, 2011, at 4:23 AM, Hans Bakker wrote:


Hi community,

the version of Ant distributed with ofbiz is pretty old and has some 
disadvantages:
1. does not support the failonerror=true on tepatch command
2. difficult command line when using apply-ofbiz-patches:
../../ant apply-ofbiz-patches

i tested using the ant version 1.8.2 and it seems to work fine.

why not remove it and use the standard ant install?
could still have the ant command to redirect to the external ant

opinions please?

regards,
Hans