Re: remove ant from ofbiz
I would also prefer to add upgrade the embedded version. That make it much easier for the user, he haven't to deal with a local ant installation, that properly causes compatibility issues if the wrong ant version is installed on the user machine... But +1 for upgrading! 2011/12/22 Jacques Le Roux jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com: +1 Jacques From: Jacopo Cappellato jacopo.cappell...@hotwaxmedia.com Hi Hans, what I don't like is that this will add a new system requirement for the user. Why not upgrading the embedded version instead? Jacopo On Dec 22, 2011, at 4:23 AM, Hans Bakker wrote: Hi community, the version of Ant distributed with ofbiz is pretty old and has some disadvantages: 1. does not support the failonerror=true on te patch command 2. difficult command line when using apply-ofbiz-patches: ../../ant apply-ofbiz-patches i tested using the ant version 1.8.2 and it seems to work fine. why not remove it and use the standard ant install? could still have the ant command to redirect to the external ant opinions please? regards, Hans -- Sascha Rodekamp Visit the new german OFBiz Blog: http://www.ofbiz.biz Lynx-Consulting GmbH Johanniskirchplatz 6 D-33615 Bielefeld http://www.lynx.de
Re: remove ant from ofbiz
You and others: you got it, upgraded today, Regards Hans and employees of antwebsystems. On 12/23/2011 03:41 PM, Sascha Rodekamp wrote: I would also prefer to add upgrade the embedded version. That make it much easier for the user, he haven't to deal with a local ant installation, that properly causes compatibility issues if the wrong ant version is installed on the user machine... But +1 for upgrading! 2011/12/22 Jacques Le Rouxjacques.le.r...@les7arts.com: +1 Jacques From: Jacopo Cappellatojacopo.cappell...@hotwaxmedia.com Hi Hans, what I don't like is that this will add a new system requirement for the user. Why not upgrading the embedded version instead? Jacopo On Dec 22, 2011, at 4:23 AM, Hans Bakker wrote: Hi community, the version of Ant distributed with ofbiz is pretty old and has some disadvantages: 1. does not support the failonerror=true on tepatch command 2. difficult command line when using apply-ofbiz-patches: ../../ant apply-ofbiz-patches i tested using the ant version 1.8.2 and it seems to work fine. why not remove it and use the standard ant install? could still have the ant command to redirect to the external ant opinions please? regards, Hans
Re: remove ant from ofbiz
+1 Jacques From: Jacopo Cappellato jacopo.cappell...@hotwaxmedia.com Hi Hans, what I don't like is that this will add a new system requirement for the user. Why not upgrading the embedded version instead? Jacopo On Dec 22, 2011, at 4:23 AM, Hans Bakker wrote: Hi community, the version of Ant distributed with ofbiz is pretty old and has some disadvantages: 1. does not support the failonerror=true on te patch command 2. difficult command line when using apply-ofbiz-patches: ../../ant apply-ofbiz-patches i tested using the ant version 1.8.2 and it seems to work fine. why not remove it and use the standard ant install? could still have the ant command to redirect to the external ant opinions please? regards, Hans
Re: remove ant from ofbiz
Hi Hans, what I don't like is that this will add a new system requirement for the user. Why not upgrading the embedded version instead? Jacopo On Dec 22, 2011, at 4:23 AM, Hans Bakker wrote: Hi community, the version of Ant distributed with ofbiz is pretty old and has some disadvantages: 1. does not support the failonerror=true on te patch command 2. difficult command line when using apply-ofbiz-patches: ../../ant apply-ofbiz-patches i tested using the ant version 1.8.2 and it seems to work fine. why not remove it and use the standard ant install? could still have the ant command to redirect to the external ant opinions please? regards, Hans
Re: remove ant from ofbiz
Looks like the best way also because Ubuntu 10.04 LTS by default installs ant 1.7 while 1.8 is needed. Lets see what we can do here Hans On 12/22/2011 01:22 PM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote: Hi Hans, what I don't like is that this will add a new system requirement for the user. Why not upgrading the embedded version instead? Jacopo On Dec 22, 2011, at 4:23 AM, Hans Bakker wrote: Hi community, the version of Ant distributed with ofbiz is pretty old and has some disadvantages: 1. does not support the failonerror=true on tepatch command 2. difficult command line when using apply-ofbiz-patches: ../../ant apply-ofbiz-patches i tested using the ant version 1.8.2 and it seems to work fine. why not remove it and use the standard ant install? could still have the ant command to redirect to the external ant opinions please? regards, Hans