[jira] [Comment Edited] (OOZIE-2814) OYA: Update example workflows to newest schemas
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OOZIE-2814?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16365983#comment-16365983
]
Attila Sasvari edited comment on OOZIE-2814 at 2/15/18 5:30 PM:
{{mvn test
-Dtest=TestHCatMessageHandler,TestDefaultConnectionContext,TestJMSSLAEventListener,TestJMSJobEventListener,TestPartitionDependencyManagerEhcache,TestRecoveryService
-DtargetJavaVersion=1.8 -DjavaVersion=1.8}} passes locally.
was (Author: asasvari):
{{mvn test
-Dtest=TestHCatMessageHandler,TestDefaultConnectionContext,TestJMSSLAEventListener,TestJMSJobEventListener,TestPartitionDependencyManagerEhcache,TestRecoveryService
-DtargetJavaVersion=1.8 -DjavaVersion=1.8}} pass locally.
> OYA: Update example workflows to newest schemas
> ---
>
> Key: OOZIE-2814
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OOZIE-2814
> Project: Oozie
> Issue Type: Sub-task
>Affects Versions: 5.0.0
>Reporter: Robert Kanter
>Assignee: Attila Sasvari
>Priority: Blocker
> Attachments: OOZIE-2814-00.patch, OOZIE-2814-01.patch,
> OOZIE-2814-02.patch, OOZIE-2814-03.patch, OOZIE-2814-04.patch,
> OOZIE-2814-05.patch, OOZIE-2814-06.patch, OOZIE-2814-07.patch
>
>
> OOZIE-2687 will add in a whole set of newer schemas that are more
> Yarn-centric. Most, if not all, examples currently use pretty old versions
> of the schemas. We should take this opportunity to update the examples to
> the newest schemas added by OOZIE-2687, which should help demonstrate them.
> It may make sense to keep the older schemas too, to show that older workflows
> still work. We have some examples where we have two workflow XML files that
> do the same thing in different ways.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
[jira] [Comment Edited] (OOZIE-2814) OYA: Update example workflows to newest schemas
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OOZIE-2814?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16364174#comment-16364174 ] Peter Cseh edited comment on OOZIE-2814 at 2/14/18 2:51 PM: The patch looks good overall. Have you tried running the old examples after the code changes to check on backwards compatibility? was (Author: gezapeti): The patch looks good overall. Have you tried running the old examples after the code changes to check on backwards compatibility?https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OOZIE-2814?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels%3Acomment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16363929# > OYA: Update example workflows to newest schemas > --- > > Key: OOZIE-2814 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OOZIE-2814 > Project: Oozie > Issue Type: Sub-task >Affects Versions: 5.0.0 >Reporter: Robert Kanter >Assignee: Attila Sasvari >Priority: Blocker > Attachments: OOZIE-2814-00.patch, OOZIE-2814-01.patch, > OOZIE-2814-02.patch, OOZIE-2814-03.patch, OOZIE-2814-04.patch, > OOZIE-2814-05.patch, OOZIE-2814-06.patch > > > OOZIE-2687 will add in a whole set of newer schemas that are more > Yarn-centric. Most, if not all, examples currently use pretty old versions > of the schemas. We should take this opportunity to update the examples to > the newest schemas added by OOZIE-2687, which should help demonstrate them. > It may make sense to keep the older schemas too, to show that older workflows > still work. We have some examples where we have two workflow XML files that > do the same thing in different ways. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005)
